Literature DB >> 18848367

Is conservation triage just smart decision making?

Madeleine C Bottrill1, Liana N Joseph, Josie Carwardine, Michael Bode, Carly Cook, Edward T Game, Hedley Grantham, Salit Kark, Simon Linke, Eve McDonald-Madden, Robert L Pressey, Susan Walker, Kerrie A Wilson, Hugh P Possingham.   

Abstract

Conservation efforts and emergency medicine face comparable problems: how to use scarce resources wisely to conserve valuable assets. In both fields, the process of prioritising actions is known as triage. Although often used implicitly by conservation managers, scientists and policymakers, triage has been misinterpreted as the process of simply deciding which assets (e.g. species, habitats) will not receive investment. As a consequence, triage is sometimes associated with a defeatist conservation ethic. However, triage is no more than the efficient allocation of conservation resources and we risk wasting scarce resources if we do not follow its basic principles.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18848367     DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  65 in total

1.  The candid approach. Scientists should insist on a purely scientific approach to preserving biodiversity.

Authors:  Valentí Rull
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Reconciling global mammal prioritization schemes into a strategy.

Authors:  Carlo Rondinini; Luigi Boitani; Ana S L Rodrigues; Thomas M Brooks; Robert L Pressey; Piero Visconti; Jonathan E M Baillie; Daniele Baisero; Mar Cabeza; Kevin R Crooks; Moreno Di Marco; Kent H Redford; Sandy A Andelman; Michael Hoffmann; Luigi Maiorano; Simon N Stuart; Kerrie A Wilson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Biodiversity gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species conservation.

Authors:  Joseph R Bennett; Richard Maloney; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  DNA barcoding of phytopathogens for disease diagnostics and bio-surveillance.

Authors:  Prassan Choudhary; Bansh Narayan Singh; Hillol Chakdar; Anil Kumar Saxena
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 5.  Mitigating amphibian chytridiomycoses in nature.

Authors:  Trenton W J Garner; Benedikt R Schmidt; An Martel; Frank Pasmans; Erin Muths; Andrew A Cunningham; Che Weldon; Matthew C Fisher; Jaime Bosch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  Biodiversity in the Anthropocene: prospects and policy.

Authors:  Nathalie Seddon; Georgina M Mace; Shahid Naeem; Joseph A Tobias; Alex L Pigot; Rachel Cavanagh; David Mouillot; James Vause; Matt Walpole
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Extinction debt from climate change for frogs in the wet tropics.

Authors:  Damien A Fordham; Barry W Brook; Conrad J Hoskin; Robert L Pressey; Jeremy VanDerWal; Stephen E Williams
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Estimating and modelling bias of the hierarchical partitioning public-domain software: implications in environmental management and conservation.

Authors:  Pedro P Olea; Patricia Mateo-Tomás; Angel de Frutos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Beyond the fragmentation threshold hypothesis: regime shifts in biodiversity across fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Renata Pardini; Adriana de Arruda Bueno; Toby A Gardner; Paulo Inácio Prado; Jean Paul Metzger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The ecosystem-service chain and the biological diversity crisis.

Authors:  Harold A Mooney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.