Literature DB >> 23065904

Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs.

Donal P McCarthy1, Paul F Donald, Jörn P W Scharlemann, Graeme M Buchanan, Andrew Balmford, Jonathan M H Green, Leon A Bennun, Neil D Burgess, Lincoln D C Fishpool, Stephen T Garnett, David L Leonard, Richard F Maloney, Paul Morling, H Martin Schaefer, Andy Symes, David A Wiedenfeld, Stuart H M Butchart.   

Abstract

World governments have committed to halting human-induced extinctions and safeguarding important sites for biodiversity by 2020, but the financial costs of meeting these targets are largely unknown. We estimate the cost of reducing the extinction risk of all globally threatened bird species (by ≥1 International Union for Conservation of Nature Red List category) to be U.S. $0.875 to $1.23 billion annually over the next decade, of which 12% is currently funded. Incorporating threatened nonavian species increases this total to U.S. $3.41 to $4.76 billion annually. We estimate that protecting and effectively managing all terrestrial sites of global avian conservation significance (11,731 Important Bird Areas) would cost U.S. $65.1 billion annually. Adding sites for other taxa increases this to U.S. $76.1 billion annually. Meeting these targets will require conservation funding to increase by at least an order of magnitude.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23065904     DOI: 10.1126/science.1229803

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  67 in total

1.  Socio-economic and ecological impacts of global protected area expansion plans.

Authors:  Piero Visconti; Michel Bakkenes; Robert J Smith; Lucas Joppa; Rachel E Sykes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines.

Authors:  Anthony Waldron; Arne O Mooers; Daniel C Miller; Nate Nibbelink; David Redding; Tyler S Kuhn; J Timmons Roberts; John L Gittleman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The performance and potential of protected areas.

Authors:  James E M Watson; Nigel Dudley; Daniel B Segan; Marc Hockings
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism.

Authors:  Federico Montesino Pouzols; Tuuli Toivonen; Enrico Di Minin; Aija S Kukkala; Peter Kullberg; Johanna Kuusterä; Joona Lehtomäki; Henrikki Tenkanen; Peter H Verburg; Atte Moilanen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Conservation: Mind the gaps.

Authors:  Thomas M Brooks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Biodiversity gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species conservation.

Authors:  Joseph R Bennett; Richard Maloney; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Policy: Hasten end of dated fossil-fuel subsidies.

Authors:  Tara Martin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Setting priorities in biodiversity conservation: An exercise with students, recent graduates, and environmental managers in Brazil.

Authors:  Emanuelle Cordeiro Azevedo Souza; Enrico Bernard
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 5.129

9.  Economics: Conservation in the red.

Authors:  Stephen Polasky
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Drivers of extinction risk in African mammals: the interplay of distribution state, human pressure, conservation response and species biology.

Authors:  Moreno Di Marco; Graeme M Buchanan; Zoltan Szantoi; Milena Holmgren; Gabriele Grottolo Marasini; Dorit Gross; Sandra Tranquilli; Luigi Boitani; Carlo Rondinini
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.