Literature DB >> 25800242

Development and validation of a clinical score for predicting risk of adenoma at screening colonoscopy.

Aasma Shaukat1, Timothy R Church2, Ryan Shanley3, Noah D Kauff4, Michael J O'Brien5, Glenn M Mills6, Paul A Jordan7, John A Allen8, Adam Kim9, Andrew D Feld10, Ann Graham Zauber11, Sidney J Winawer12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, no clinical tools use demographic and risk factor information to predict the risk of finding an adenoma in individuals undergoing colon cancer screening. Such a tool would be valuable for identifying those who would most benefit from screening colonoscopy.
METHODS: We used baseline data from men and women who underwent screening colonoscopy from the randomized, multicenter National Colonoscopy Study (NCS) to develop and validate an adenoma risk model. The study, conducted at three sites in the United States (Minneapolis, MN; Seattle, WA; and Shreveport, LA) asked all participants to complete baseline questionnaires on clinical risk factors and family history. Model parameters estimated from logistic regression yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCC) used to assess prediction.
RESULTS: Five hundred forty-one subjects were included in the development model, and 1,334 in the validation of the risk score. Variables in the prediction of adenoma risk for colonoscopy screening were age (likelihood ratio test for overall contribution to model, P < 0.001), male sex (P < 0.001), body mass index (P < 0.001), family history of at least one first-degree relative with colorectal cancer (P = 0.036), and smoking history (P < 0.001). The adjusted AUROCC of 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.61-0.74] for the derivation cohort was not statistically significantly different from that in the validation cohort. The adjusted AUROCC for the entire cohort was 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.67).
CONCLUSION: We developed and validated a simple well-calibrated risk score. IMPACT: This tool may be useful for estimating risk of adenomas in screening eligible men and women. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25800242      PMCID: PMC4452431          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-1321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  37 in total

Review 1.  ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; David Lieberman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Validation studies on a model for breast cancer risk.

Authors:  M H Gail; J Benichou
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-04-20       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Early identification of individuals at increased risk for cancer of the large intestine. Part I: definition of high risk populations.

Authors:  M Lipkin; S J Winawer; P Sherlock
Journal:  Clin Bull       Date:  1981

4.  Physical activity, obesity, and risk of colorectal adenoma in women (United States).

Authors:  E Giovannucci; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  Philip Schoenfeld; Brooks Cash; Andrew Flood; Richard Dobhan; John Eastone; Walter Coyle; James W Kikendall; Hyungjin Myra Kim; David G Weiss; Theresa Emory; Arthur Schatzkin; David Lieberman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Cigarette smoking, alcohol, and the risk of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  R S Sandler; C M Lyles; C McAuliffe; J T Woosley; L L Kupper
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  Classification and risk assessment of individuals with familial polyposis, Gardner's syndrome, and familial non-polyposis colon cancer from [3H]thymidine labeling patterns in colonic epithelial cells.

Authors:  M Lipkin; W A Blattner; E J Gardner; R W Burt; H Lynch; E Deschner; S Winawer; J F Fraumeni
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Physical activity, obesity, and risk for colon cancer and adenoma in men.

Authors:  E Giovannucci; A Ascherio; E B Rimm; G A Colditz; M J Stampfer; W C Willett
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Precursors of colorectal carcinoma. Biopsy and biologic markers.

Authors:  M J O'Brien; J C O'Keane; A Zauber; L S Gottlieb; S J Winawer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.

Authors:  Hans-Dieter Allescher; Vincens Weingart
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-07-09

2.  Strongly enhanced colorectal cancer risk stratification by combining family history and genetic risk score.

Authors:  Korbinian Weigl; Jenny Chang-Claude; Phillip Knebel; Li Hsu; Michael Hoffmeister; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Risk Model for Colorectal Cancer in Spanish Population Using Environmental and Genetic Factors: Results from the MCC-Spain study.

Authors:  Gemma Ibáñez-Sanz; Anna Díez-Villanueva; M Henar Alonso; Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta; Beatriz Pérez-Gómez; Mariona Bustamante; Vicente Martin; Javier Llorca; Pilar Amiano; Eva Ardanaz; Adonina Tardón; Jose J Jiménez-Moleón; Rosana Peiró; Juan Alguacil; Carmen Navarro; Elisabet Guinó; Gemma Binefa; Pablo Fernández-Navarro; Anna Espinosa; Verónica Dávila-Batista; Antonio José Molina; Camilo Palazuelos; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Nuria Aragonés; Manolis Kogevinas; Marina Pollán; Victor Moreno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Development and validation of a prediction model for adenoma detection during screening and surveillance colonoscopy with comparison to actual adenoma detection rates.

Authors:  Eelco C Brand; Julia E Crook; Colleen S Thomas; Peter D Siersema; Douglas K Rex; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Outcomes of screening and surveillance in people with two parents affected by colorectal cancers: experiences from the Familial Bowel Cancer Service.

Authors:  Jennifer Pan; Masha Slattery; Natalie Shea; Finlay Macrae
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 2.857

6.  Establish a Novel Model for Predicting the Risk of Colorectal Ademomatous Polyps: a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wenjie Li; Zhe Chen; Han Chen; Xu Han; Guoxin Zhang; Xiaoying Zhou
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 4.478

Review 7.  Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Carolyn M Rutter; Amy B Knudsen; Jennifer S Lin; Kathryn E Bouskill
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.090

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.