Literature DB >> 1511379

Precursors of colorectal carcinoma. Biopsy and biologic markers.

M J O'Brien1, J C O'Keane, A Zauber, L S Gottlieb, S J Winawer.   

Abstract

The term biologic marker (biomarker) of colorectal cancer refers in this article to an early preclinical phenotypic characteristic that relates to the risk for developing this cancer. Putative biologic markers in the normal colorectal mucosa of patients at risk include abnormal cell proliferation as determined by kinetic studies, ornithine decarboxylase activity, and polyamine synthesis. Alterations of mucin synthesis have been studied using both histochemical stains and lectin-binding techniques. Blood group and related carbohydrate antigens also have been evaluated as potential biomarkers in the normal mucosa. Biopsy small (less than 5 mm) polyps encountered at endoscopy has become a standard practice. Although a small polyp found to be an adenoma has a low likelihood of harboring high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma, it represents an indicator of risk for colorectal neoplasia. Hyperplastic polyps, however, even though they have certain epidemiologic associations with colorectal neoplasia, are controversial as putative biomarkers of clinical relevance. Current research supports a concept of a field defect of the colorectal mucosa at risk for neoplasia, which may be identified by phenotypic abnormalities of the normal mucosa and the development of small adenomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1511379     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920901)70:3+<1317::aid-cncr2820701519>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Standardized and structured histopathological evaluation of colorectal polyps: a practical checklist against the background of the new WHO classification].

Authors:  G B Baretton; A Tannapfel; W Schmitt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Faecal calprotectin levels in a high risk population for colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  O Kronborg; M Ugstad; P Fuglerud; B Johne; J Hardcastle; J H Scholefield; K Vellacott; V Moshakis; J R Reynolds
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Development and validation of a clinical score for predicting risk of adenoma at screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Timothy R Church; Ryan Shanley; Noah D Kauff; Michael J O'Brien; Glenn M Mills; Paul A Jordan; John A Allen; Adam Kim; Andrew D Feld; Ann Graham Zauber; Sidney J Winawer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Rh-I-UEA-1 polymerized liposomes target and image adenomatous polyps in the APC(Min/+) mouse using optical colonography.

Authors:  Celeste A Roney; Biying Xu; Jianwu Xie; Shuai Yuan; Jeremiah Wierwille; Chao-Wei Chen; Yu Chen; Gary L Griffiths; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 4.488

5.  Colonic epithelial cell proliferation in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer.

Authors:  S E Green; P Chapman; J Burn; A D Burt; M Bennett; D R Appleton; J S Varma; J C Mathers
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Colonic cell proliferation in two different ethnic groups with contrasting incidence of colon cancer: is there a difference in carcinogenesis?

Authors:  A van't Hof; K Gilissen; R J Cohen; L Taylor; Z Haffajee; A L Thornley; I Segal
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 7.  The relationship between distal and proximal colonic neoplasia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitra Dodou; Joost C F de Winter
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 5.128

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.