Literature DB >> 25799130

In search of the best reconstructive technique after pancreaticoduodenectomy: pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy.

Jan Grendar1, Jean-François Ouellet2, Francis R Sutherland1, Oliver F Bathe1, Chad G Ball1, Elijah Dixon1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) is a safer reconstruction than pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), resulting in lower morbidity, including lower pancreatic leak rates and decreased postoperative mortality. We compared PJ and PG after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).
METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was designed. It was stopped with 50% accrual. Patients underwent either PG or PJ reconstruction. The primary outcome was the pancreatic fistula rate, and the secondary outcomes were overall morbidity and mortality. We used the Student t, Mann-Whitney U and χ(2) tests for intention to treat analysis. The effect of randomization, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, soft pancreatic texture and use of pancreatic stent on overall complications and fistula rates was calculated using logistic regression.
RESULTS: Our trial included 98 patients. The rate of pancreatic fistula formation was 18% in the PJ and 25% in the PG groups (p = 0.40). Postoperative complications occurred in 48% of patients in the PJ and 58% in the PG groups (p = 0.31). There were no significant predictors of overall complications in the multivariate analysis. Only soft pancreatic gland predicted the occurrence of pancreatic fistula (odds ratio 5.89, p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the rates of pancreatic leak/fistula, overall complications or mortality between patients undergoing PG and and those undergoing PJ after PD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25799130      PMCID: PMC4447507          DOI: 10.1503/cjs.010014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  32 in total

1.  A comparison of pancreaticogastrostomy and pancreaticojejunostomy following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Gerard V Aranha; Pamela Hodul; Eugene Golts; Daniel Oh; Jack Pickleman; Steven Creech
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Comparison of pancreatogastrostomy and pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy performed by one surgeon.

Authors:  S W Kim; E G Youk; Y H Park
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Meta-analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy prospective controlled trials: pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction.

Authors:  Jin-Ping Ma; Lin Peng; Tao Qin; Jian-Wei Lin; Chuang-Qi Chen; Shi-Rong Cai; Liang Wang; Yu-Long He
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 6.  Does the type of pancreaticojejunostomy after Whipple alter the leak rate?

Authors:  Chad G Ball; Thomas J Howard
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2010

7.  Open pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a pilot study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Giovanni Butturini; Roberto Salvia; Stefano Crippa; Massimo Falconi; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  [Complications of two types of pancreatic anastomosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy].

Authors:  T Andivot; J Cardoso; B Dousset; O Soubrane; P Bonnichon; Y Chapuis
Journal:  Ann Chir       Date:  1996

9.  A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Duffas; Bertrand Suc; Simon Msika; Gilles Fourtanier; Fabrice Muscari; Jean Marie Hay; Abe Fingerhut; Bertrand Millat; Alexandre Radovanowic; Pierre-Louis Fagniez
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ayman El Nakeeb; Emad Hamdy; Ahmad M Sultan; Tarek Salah; Waleed Askr; Helmy Ezzat; Mohamed Said; Mostaffa Abu Zeied; Tallat Abdallah
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 3.647

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Pancreaticojejunostomy is comparable to pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Roberto Cirocchi; Justus Randolph; Stefano Partelli; Giulio Belfiori; Alessandra Piccioli; Amilcare Parisi; Massimo Falconi
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Pancreaticojejunostomy With Externalized Stent vs Pancreaticogastrostomy With Externalized Stent for Patients With High-Risk Pancreatic Anastomosis: A Single-Center, Phase 3, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Stefano Andrianello; Giovanni Marchegiani; Giuseppe Malleo; Gaia Masini; Alberto Balduzzi; Salvatore Paiella; Alessandro Esposito; Luca Landoni; Luca Casetti; Massimiliano Tuveri; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

Review 3.  Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction for the prevention of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Yao Cheng; Marta Briarava; Mingliang Lai; Xiaomei Wang; Bing Tu; Nansheng Cheng; Jianping Gong; Yuhong Yuan; Pierluigi Pilati; Simone Mocellin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-12

4.  Comparison of Different Techniques of Pancreatic Stump Management in Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Samarth Durgam; Mario Masrur; Luis Fernando Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; Antonio Gangemi; Francesco M Bianco; Pier C Giulianotti
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-08-27

Review 5.  Pancreatogastrostomy versus Pancreatojejunostomy: An Up-to-Date Meta-Analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Konstantinos Perivoliotis; Eleni Sioka; Athina Tatsioni; Ioannis Stefanidis; Elias Zintzaras; Dimitrios Zacharoulis
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-07-17

Review 6.  Surgical techniques and postoperative management to prevent postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Hiromichi Kawaida; Hiroshi Kono; Naohiro Hosomura; Hidetake Amemiya; Jun Itakura; Hideki Fujii; Daisuke Ichikawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Pancreatogastrostomy vs pancreatojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of RCTs and our experience.

Authors:  Yun Jin; Yang-Yang Feng; Xiao-Gang Qi; Geng Hao; Yuan-Quan Yu; Jiang-Tao Li; Shu-You Peng
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-07-27

Review 8.  Pancreatic outflow tract reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xin Xin Wang; Yu Ke Yan; Bao Long Dong; Yuan Li; Xiao Jun Yang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 9.  Risk factors and preventive strategies for post-operative pancreatic fistula after pancreatic surgery: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Kjetil Søreide; Knut Jørgen Labori
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.423

10.  Predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula in pancreatic head resections: which score fits all?

Authors:  Mariam Adamu; Verena Plodeck; Claudia Adam; Anne Roehnert; Thilo Welsch; Juergen Weitz; Marius Distler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.895

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.