Literature DB >> 30976577

Comparison of Different Techniques of Pancreatic Stump Management in Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia1, Samarth Durgam1, Mario Masrur1, Luis Fernando Gonzalez-Ciccarelli1, Antonio Gangemi1, Francesco M Bianco1, Pier C Giulianotti1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various technical improvements have decreased the morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is the most feared complication, and the ideal technique for pancreatic reconstruction is undetermined. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors and incidence of POPF with different types of pancreatic stump management after robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent RAPD at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System between September 2007 and January 2016. The cohort was divided based on the type of pancreatic stump management: pancreatic duct occlusion with cyanoacrylate glue (CG), pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ), posterior pancreaticogastrostomy (PPG), and transgastric pancreaticogastrostomy (TPG).
RESULTS: The cohort included 69 patients: pancreatic duct occlusion with CG (n = 18), PJ (n = 12), PPG (n = 11), and TPG (n = 28). Pancreatic duct diameter < 3 mm and duct occlusion with CG were identified as risk factors for POPF (p < 0.05). The incidence of POPF was lower when TPG and PJ were performed (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction with PJ and TPG had better results compared to pancreatic duct occlusion with CG and PPG. However, TPG was the technique of choice and showed comparable results to PJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic stump management; Postoperative pancreatic fistula; Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 30976577      PMCID: PMC6422150          DOI: 10.1159/000489777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors        ISSN: 2296-3774


  52 in total

1.  Does pancreatic duct stenting decrease the rate of pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy? Results of a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; David C Chang; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; JoAnn Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Christopher J Sonnenday; Christopher L Wolfgang; Michael R Marohn; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Christos Dervenis; Giovanni Butturini; Abe Fingerhut; Charles Yeo; Jakob Izbicki; John Neoptolemos; Michael Sarr; William Traverso; Marcus Buchler
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.982

3.  Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection: prospective study for 104 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Manabu Kawai; Masaji Tani; Hiroshi Terasawa; Shinomi Ina; Seiko Hirono; Ryohei Nishioka; Motoki Miyazawa; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for benign and malignant diseases.

Authors:  J L Dulucq; P Wintringer; A Mahajna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Management of bleeding and leakage after pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  S M M de Castro; O R C Busch; D J Gouma
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.043

7.  Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy reduces the risk of pancreatic leakage after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ryo Hosotani; Ryuichiro Doi; Masayuki Imamura
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-11-26       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

9.  Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Markus W Büchler; Markus Wagner; Bruno M Schmied; Waldemar Uhl; Helmut Friess; Kaspar Z'graggen
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-12

10.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Chinnasamy Palanivelu; Kalpesh Jani; Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Ramasamy Parthasarathi; Subbaiah Rajapandian; Madathupalayam Velusamy Madhankumar
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  2 in total

1.  Robot-Assisted Pancreatic Surgery: A Structured Approach to Standardization of a Program and of the Operation.

Authors:  Charlotte Friederieke Müller-Debus; Michael Thomaschewski; Markus Zimmermann; Ulrich F Wellner; Dirk Bausch; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2020-03-17

2.  Use of barbed suture without fashioning the "classical" Wirsung-jejunostomy in a modified end-to-side robotic pancreatojejunostomy.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Niccolò Furbetta; Desirée Gianardi; Simone Guadagni; Gregorio Di Franco; Matteo Bianchini; Matteo Palmeri; Caterina Masoni; Giulio Di Candio; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.