| Literature DB >> 31583237 |
In Seong Jeong1,2,3, Zhenglin Piao3, Md Mahbubur Rahman1,2, Sehoon Kim1,4, Nam Soo Kim1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of surgical decompression and rehabilitation therapy in dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk herniation (IVDH).Entities:
Keywords: Neurologic outcome; electrotherapy; exercise; infrared therapy; neurologic grading
Year: 2019 PMID: 31583237 PMCID: PMC6760504 DOI: 10.5455/javar.2019.f359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Vet Anim Res ISSN: 2311-7710
Figure 1.General characterization for the surgical treatment, case selection, separation, and rehabilitation therapy for dogs with thoracolumbar IVDD.
Figure 2.Evaluation of neurologic status in the hind limbs with the Olby scoring technique.
Figure 3.Muscle tonicity in the hind limb measured by the MyotonPRO technique. A: measurement of muscle tone from the hamstring muscle; B: measurement of muscle tone from the quadriceps muscle.
Figure 4.Comparison of standing time, walking time, and success rate between the rehabilitation and without rehabilitation groups. NRG: non-rehabilitated group; RG: rehabilitated group. The data are reported as the mean ± SEM *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01, Bonferroni post hoc test following one-way ANOVA versus the NRG group. Percentages of data were analyzed using a two-sample proportion test with Minitab software (version 16.1) to assess any significant difference between the two groups.
Post-operative clinical outcomes for dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk herniation with rehabilitation based on pre-operative grading score.
| Grade | Surgical result | Case | Mean standing after surgery (days) | Mean walking day after surgery (days) | Recovery percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 ( | Excellent | 31 | 4.6 ± 2.8 | 6.9 ± 2.2 | 97.14% |
| Good | 3 | ||||
| Fair | 1 | No improvement | |||
| Poor | 0 | Dead | |||
| 3 ( | Excellent | 40 | 5.1 ± 3.6 | 7.0 ± 2.5 | 93.33% |
| Good | 2 | ||||
| Fair | 1 | No improvement | |||
| Poor | 2 | Dead | |||
| 4 ( | Excellent | 5 | 8.0 ± 3.4 | 13.0 ± 2.10 | 43.75% |
| Good | 2 | ||||
| Fair | 5 | 7 days (body only), 14 days (body only), (no walking) | |||
| Poor | 4 | Dead |
Post-operative clinical outcomes for dogs with thoracolumbar intervertebral disk herniation without rehabilitation therapy, based on pre-operative grading score.
| Grade | Surgical result | Case | Mean standing after surgery (days) | Mean walking day after surgery (days) | Recovery percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 ( | Excellent | 16 | 4.7 ± 4.8 | 7.0 ± 3.2 | 82.35% |
| Good | 12 | ||||
| Fair | 3 | No improvement | |||
| Poor | 3 | Dead | |||
| 3 ( | Excellent | 4 | 5.3 ± 4.4 | 7.9 ± 3.2 | 51.85% |
| Good | 10 | ||||
| Fair | 8 | No improvement | |||
| Poor | 6 | Dead | |||
| 4 ( | Excellent | 0 | 8.9 ± 5.1 | 14.4 ± 3.6 | 17.24% |
| Good | 5 | ||||
| Fair | 4 | 7 days (body only), 14 days (body only), (no walking) | |||
| Poor | 20 | Dead | |||
Figure 5.Gradual changes in improving neurologic outcome (n = 15) of dogs after surgical decompression of intervertebral disk herniation with or without rehabilitation therapy (before and after surgery until 90 days). The data are reported as the mean ± SEM *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001, Bonferroni post hoc test following two-way ANOVA versus the NRG group. NRG: non-rehabilitated group; RG: rehabilitated group. A: Olby scores in preoperative grade 2 dogs; B: Olby scores in preoperative grade 3 dogs and C: Olby scores in preoperative grade 4 dogs.