| Literature DB >> 25790461 |
Carolina Manosalva1, Jaqueline Mena2, Zahady Velasquez1, Charlotte K Colenso3, Sebastian Brauchi3, Rafael A Burgos1, Maria A Hidalgo1.
Abstract
Long chain fatty acids (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25790461 PMCID: PMC4366208 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119715
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Analysis of neutrophil purity by flow cytometry.
A forward-scatter vs side-scatter dot plot from a sample of neutrophils (PMN) after isolation procedure is shown.
Fig 2Sequence analysis and homology modeling of the bovine FFAR1 receptor.
Bovine FFAR1 receptor cDNA was amplified from total RNA obtained from bovine neutrophils by RT-PCR, cloned, sequenced, and the predicted amino acid sequence was obtained. (A) Structure of the bovine FFAR1 membrane domain homology model; side-view (left) and top-view (right). (B) Sequence alignment between the putative bovine FFAR1 membrane domain and the human FFAR1 (4PHU: Homo_sapiens (PDB: 4PHU) and FFAR1: Homo_sapiens (accession number: AAH95536)) used for model construction. Colored sequence annotations based on 4PHU identify the extent of transmembrane helices. Residues highlighted in grey indicate a mismatch between the aligned sequences. 4PHU residues highlighted in dark grey indicate point mutations made to aid structure determination (Leu42Ala, Phe88Ala, Gly103Ala and Tyr202Phe). (C) Sequence alignment between the putative bovine FFAR1 membrane domain, human FFAR1 and human FFAR3 was performed using Clustal Omega. Colored sequence annotations based on 4PHU identify the approximate extent of transmembrane helices. Residues highlighted in grey indicate a mismatch between the aligned sequences.
Fig 3LCFAs and GW9508 increase intracellular calcium mobilization in CHO-K1 cells expressing bovine FFAR1 receptor.
CHO-K1 cells were transfected with pcDNA3-bFFAR1 (CHO-K1/bFFAR1) or empty pcDNA3.1 plasmid (CHO-K1/pcDNA3.1), and the expression of bFFAR1 receptor was analyzed by FACS (A). Bovine neutrophils and MCF7 cells were used as positive controls. + FFAR1 Ab: analysis with FFAR1 antibody (primary antibody);—FFAR1: analysis without FFAR1 antibody (primary antibody). Intracellular calcium in CHO-K1/bFFAR1 cells was measured by spectrofluorimetry using the fluorescent probe Fura2-AM (B-F). A representative register (upper graphs) and area under the curve (AUC) between 60–150 s (bar graphs in middle graph) of different concentrations of oleic acid (0–500 μM) (B), linoleic acid (0–200 μM) (C), GW9508 (0–100 μM) (D), propionic acid (0–30 mM) (E) or ionomycin (2 μM) and thapsigargin (2 μM) (F) are shown. In each set of experiments, a representative register indicates treatment with solvent (control), 300 μM oleic acid, 100 μM linoleic acid, 10 μM GW9508 or 10 and 30 mM propionic acid in CHO-K1 cells transfected with empty pcDNA3.1 plasmid (bottom graphs). Arrows represent the time of solvent (control) or ligand addition. Mean ± SEM of 5 independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 compared with the control. OA: oleic acid, LA: linoleic acid, PA: propionic acid.
Fig 4Pharmacological inhibition of the intracellular calcium mobilization induced by LCFAs or GW9508 in CHO-K1/bFFAR1 cells.
CHO-K1 cells transfected with the bovine FFAR1 receptor were treated with solvent, the antagonist of the FFAR1 receptor, GW1100 (10 μM), for 15 min or the PLC inhibitor, U73122 (2 μM), for 3 min at 37°C, followed by solvent or 300 μM oleic acid (A and B), 100 μM linoleic acid (C and D) or 10 μM GW9508 (E and F). A representative experiment (upper graph) and area under the curve (AUC) between 60–150 s (bar graphs in lower graph) are shown. Arrows indicate the time of solvent or ligand addition. Mean ± SEM of 5 independent experiments. * p < 0.05. OA: oleic acid, LA: linoleic acid.
Fig 5Pharmacological inhibition of the intracellular calcium mobilization induced by LCFAs in bovine neutrophils.
Fluo4-AM-loaded neutrophils were treated with solvent, 10 μM GW1100 for 15 min or 2 μM U73122 for 3 min at 37°C, followed by solvent, 300 μM oleic acid (A and B) or 100 μM linoleic acid (C and D). As control, 2 μM ionomycin and 2 μM thapsigargin was used (E). A representative experiment (upper graph) and the area the under curve (AUC) between 60–150 s (bar graphs in lower graph) are shown. Arrows indicate the time of addition of the solvent or each fatty acid. Mean ± SEM of 5 independent experiments. * p < 0.05. OA: oleic acid, LA: linoleic acid.
Fig 6Effect of GW1100, U73122 or staurosporine on MMP-9 release induced by FFAR1 ligands in neutrophils.
Bovine neutrophils were incubated with 10 μM GW1100 for 15 min, 2 μM U73122 for 3 min or 2 μM staurosporine for 15 min, prior to the addition of 300 μM oleic acid (OA) (A, B and C), 100 μM linoleic acid (LA) (D, E and F) or 10 μM GW9508 (G, H and I) for 5 min at 37°C. PAF (100 nM) as positive control was used, and recombinant MMP-9 (rMMP-9) as size control was loaded in the gel (J). Supernatants were collected and analyzed by zymography. Bar graphs represent the mean ± SEM of 5 independent experiments. AU: arbitrary units. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. OA: oleic acid, LA: linoleic acid.
Fig 7Effect of GW1100, U73122 or staurosporine on ROS production induced by FFAR1 ligands in neutrophils.
Hydroethidine (HE)-loaded bovine neutrophils were incubated with 10 μM GW1100 for 15 min, 2 μM U73122 for 3 min or 2 μM staurosporine for 15 min, followed by the addition of 300 μM oleic acid (OA) (A, B and C), 100 μM linoleic acid (LA) (D, E and F) or 10 μM GW9508 (G, H and I) for 5 min at 37°C. The mean intensity fluorescence (MIF) was analyzed by FACS. Bar graphs represent the mean ± SEM of 5 independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. OA: oleic acid, LA: linoleic acid, GW: GW9508.
Fig 8Diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) inhibits ROS production induced by FFAR1 ligands in neutrophils.
Hydroethidine (HE)-loaded bovine neutrophils were incubated with 10 μM DPI for 30 min, followed by the addition of 300 μM oleic acid (OA), 100 μM linoleic acid (LA) or 10 μM GW9508 for 5 min at 37°C. The mean intensity fluorescence (MIF) was analyzed by FACS. Bar graphs represent the mean ± SEM of 5 independent experiments. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.