Literature DB >> 25788549

Comparison of the Vidas C. difficile GDH Automated Enzyme-Linked Fluorescence Immunoassay (ELFA) with Another Commercial Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (Quik Chek-60), Two Selective Media, and a PCR Assay for gluD for Detection of Clostridium difficile in Fecal Samples.

K A Davies1, C E Berry1, K A Morris1, R Smith2, S Young2, T E Davis3, D D Fuller3, R J Buckner3, M H Wilcox4.   

Abstract

Prevention and management of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) can be improved by rapid and reliable diagnostics. The Vidas C. difficile glutamate dehydrogenase assay had performance comparable to that of the Quik Chek-60 assay (overall agreement, 95%) and a sensitivity of >93%; thus, it is suitable as the first test in two-stage algorithms for a CDI diagnosis.
Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2015        PMID： 25788549      PMCID： PMC4432072          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.00649-15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Glutamate dehydrogenase is highly conserved among Clostridium difficile ribotypes.

Authors:  R J Carman; K N Wickham; L Chen; A M Lawrence; J H Boone; T D Wilkins; T M Kerkering; D M Lyerly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Marianne Lund; Steen Nordentoft; Karl Pedersen; Mogens Madsen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection kits: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tim Planche; Adamma Aghaizu; Richard Holliman; Peter Riley; Jan Poloniecki; Aodhán Breathnach; Sanjeev Krishna
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Impact of the type of diagnostic assay on Clostridium difficile infection and complication rates in a mandatory reporting program.

Authors:  Yves Longtin; Sylvie Trottier; Gilles Brochu; Bianka Paquet-Bolduc; Christophe Garenc; Vilayvong Loungnarath; Catherine Beaulieu; Danielle Goulet; Jean Longtin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  The role of glutamate dehydrogenase for the detection of Clostridium difficile in faecal samples: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Shetty; M W D Wren; P G Coen
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

Authors:  Kerrie Eastwood; Patrick Else; André Charlett; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID): data review and recommendations for diagnosing Clostridium difficile-infection (CDI).

Authors:  M J T Crobach; O M Dekkers; M H Wilcox; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 8.067

8.  Characteristics and incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in The Netherlands, 2005.

Authors:  S Paltansing; R J van den Berg; R A Guseinova; C E Visser; E R van der Vorm; E J Kuijper
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 8.067

9.  Identification of the latex test-reactive protein of Clostridium difficile as glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  D M Lyerly; L A Barroso; T D Wilkins
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Laboratory diagnosis of clostridium difficile infection. An evaluation of tests for faecal toxin, glutamate dehydrogenase, lactoferrin and toxigenic culture in the diagnostic laboratory.

Authors:  M W D Wren; M Sivapalan; R Kinson; N R Shetty
Journal:  Br J Biomed Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.829
View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a + B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium.

Authors:  A Olling; H Leidinger; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces of Asymptomatic Patients Admitted to the Hospital.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Terveer; Monique J T Crobach; Ingrid M J G Sanders; Margreet C Vos; Cees M Verduin; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of Diagnostic Algorithms for Detecting Toxigenic Clostridium difficile in Routine Practice at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Korea.

Authors:  Hee-Won Moon; Hyeong Nyeon Kim; Mina Hur; Hee Sook Shim; Heejung Kim; Yeo-Min Yun
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Current knowledge on the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Adrián Martínez-Meléndez; Adrián Camacho-Ortiz; Rayo Morfin-Otero; Héctor Jesús Maldonado-Garza; Licet Villarreal-Treviño; Elvira Garza-González
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Laboratory Diagnostic Methods for Clostridioides difficile Infection: the First Systematic Review and Meta-analysis in Korea.

Authors:  Hae-Sun Chung; Jeong Su Park; Bo-Moon Shin
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.464

6.  Comparative Study of Clostridium difficile Clinical Detection Methods in Patients with Diarrhoea.

Authors:  Yanyan Xiao; Yong Liu; Xiaosong Qin
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 2.471
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.