Literature DB >> 17922780

Characteristics and incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in The Netherlands, 2005.

S Paltansing1, R J van den Berg, R A Guseinova, C E Visser, E R van der Vorm, E J Kuijper.   

Abstract

During a 2-month period in 2005, 13 laboratories participated in a surveillance study of Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) in 17 hospitals in The Netherlands. The median incidence rate of CDAD was 16/10 000 patient admissions (2.2/10 000 patient-days) and varied from 1 to 46/10 000 patient admissions according to hospital. In total, 81 patients with CDAD were reported; 49 (61%) patients had nosocomial CDAD, and 29 (36%) patients were admitted to hospital when already suffering from diarrhoea. Two (2%) deaths were attributable to CDAD; both of these patients were admitted with severe community-onset CDAD and were aged >80 years. Among 64 toxinogenic isolates, ten (16%) belonged to PCR ribotype 027 and ten (16%) to PCR ribotype 014. Type 027 was identified in ten patients from one hospital during an unrecognised outbreak. Toxinotyping of the 64 isolates revealed the presence of six different toxinogenic types, with 41 (64%) isolates of toxinotype 0, ten (16%) isolates of toxinotype III, and nine (14%) isolates of toxinotype V. Of the 64 toxinogenic isolates, seven (11%) had a 39-bp deletion in the tcdC gene, 11 (17%) had an 18-bp deletion, and one (1%) had a deletion of c. 44 bp. Genes for binary toxin were present in 21 (33%) of the 64 toxinogenic isolates, mainly associated with toxinotypes III and V. It was concluded that the median CDAD incidence rate of 16/10 000 patient admissions in The Netherlands is considerably lower than that in Canada and the USA, and that the emerging type 027 can spread unnoticed. The high proportion (36%) of CDAD cases with a community onset has important implications for future studies of the epidemiology of CDAD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922780     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01793.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  36 in total

1.  Clostridium difficile PCR ribotype 078: an emerging strain in humans and in pigs?

Authors:  Abraham Goorhuis; Sylvia B Debast; Leo A M G van Leengoed; Celine Harmanus; Daan W Notermans; Aldert A Bergwerff; Edward J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Genotypic investigation of Clostridium difficile in Prince Edward Island.

Authors:  H Martin; L P Abbott; D E Low; B Willey; M Mulvey; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.471

3.  Prevalence and genotypic characteristics of Clostridium difficile in a closed and integrated human and swine population.

Authors:  Keri N Norman; H Morgan Scott; Roger B Harvey; Bo Norby; Michael E Hume; Kathleen Andrews
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Comparison of the Vidas C. difficile GDH Automated Enzyme-Linked Fluorescence Immunoassay (ELFA) with Another Commercial Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) (Quik Chek-60), Two Selective Media, and a PCR Assay for gluD for Detection of Clostridium difficile in Fecal Samples.

Authors:  K A Davies; C E Berry; K A Morris; R Smith; S Young; T E Davis; D D Fuller; R J Buckner; M H Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of Clostridium difficile in Feces of Asymptomatic Patients Admitted to the Hospital.

Authors:  Elisabeth M Terveer; Monique J T Crobach; Ingrid M J G Sanders; Margreet C Vos; Cees M Verduin; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Is there a relationship between the presence of the binary toxin genes in Clostridium difficile strains and the severity of C. difficile infection (CDI)?

Authors:  C E Berry; K A Davies; D W Owens; M H Wilcox
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Hospital-associated Clostridium difficile infection: is it necessary to track community-onset disease?

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Kathleen M McMullen; Jennie L Mayfield; Kimberly A Reske; Peter Georgantopoulos; David K Warren; Victoria J Fraser
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease at University Hospital Basel including molecular characterisation of the isolates 2006-2007.

Authors:  L Fenner; R Frei; M Gregory; M Dangel; A Stranden; A F Widmer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Genome Location Dictates the Transcriptional Response to PolC Inhibition in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Erika van Eijk; Ilse M Boekhoud; Ed J Kuijper; Ingrid M J G Bos-Sanders; George Wright; Wiep Klaas Smits
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Reset of a critically disturbed microbial ecosystem: faecal transplant in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Susana Fuentes; Els van Nood; Sebastian Tims; Ineke Heikamp-de Jong; Cajo J F ter Braak; Josbert J Keller; Erwin G Zoetendal; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 10.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.