Literature DB >> 25779478

Proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs can overcome some high-risk cytogenetics in multiple myeloma but not gain 1q21.

Hareth Nahi1, Thea Kristin Våtsveen2,3, Johan Lund1, Bart M S Heeg4,5, Birgitte Preiss6, Evren Alici1, Michael Boe Møller6, Karin Fahl Wader2,7, Hanne E H Møller6, Lill Anny Grøseth2,8, Brian Østergaard9, Hong Yan Dai3, Erik Holmberg10, Gösta Gahrton1, Anders Waage2,8, Niels Abildgaard9.   

Abstract

Chromosomal aberrations have significant prognostic importance in multiple myeloma (MM). However, proteasome inhibitors (PI) and IMiDs may partly overcome the poor prognostic impact of some of them. In this study, we investigated a population-based consecutive cohort newly diagnosed patients with MM admitted during a defined time period to hospitals in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. The impact of treatment modality on the prognostic importance of specific chromosomal aberration was investigated, with special reference to gain 1q21. The median follow-up of patients still alive at analysis was 40 months for the high-dose (HDT)-treated ones and 29 months for the whole population. Three hundred forty-seven patients with a known 1q21 status were included in this study. The 347 patients were divided into three groups, that is, 119 patients with the 1q21 gain, 105 patients with other aberrations (OA), that is, del(13q), del(17p), t(4,14), and/or (14;16), and 123 patients with no aberrations (NA). The groups were compared in terms of overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and response. The 3-yr OS for patients with gain 1q21 was 60% compared to patients with OA 74% and NO 82% (gain 1q21 vs. NO P < 0.001; gain 1q21 vs. OA P = 0.095). If treated with PI or IMiDs, the 3-yr OS was 58% for patients with gain 1q21 compared to patients with OA 78% and NO 78%, respectively (P = 0.041, P = 0.140). In HDT patients, the 3-yr OS was 69% for patients with gain 1q21 compared to patients with OA 84% and NO 88%, respectively (P < 0.008, P = 0.600). Thus, neither HDT nor using PI or IMiDs could overcome the poor prognostic impact of gain 1q21, while these drugs and HDT seemed to improve OS in patients with OA, approaching the survival in NO. Further, gain 1q21 appears to be one of the most important poor prognostic chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma with current treatments. Trials using new drugs or allogeneic transplantation are warranted.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chromosomal abberation; clinical; gain 1q21; multiple myeloma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25779478     DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Haematol        ISSN: 0902-4441            Impact factor:   2.997


  16 in total

1.  Outcome of Patients with Multiple Myeloma and CKS1B Gene Amplification after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors:  Fabian Bock; Gary Lu; Samer A Srour; Sameh Gaballa; Heather Y Lin; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani; Medhavi Honhar; Maximilian Stich; Nina Das Shah; Qaiser Bashir; Krina Patel; Uday Popat; Chitra Hosing; Martin Korbling; Ruby Delgado; Gabriela Rondon; Jatin J Shah; Sheeba K Thomas; Elisabet E Manasanch; Berend Isermann; Robert Z Orlowski; Richard E Champlin; Muzaffar H Qazilbash
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Pleural effusion-based nomogram to predict outcomes in unselected patients with multiple myeloma: a large single center experience.

Authors:  Zi-Liang Hou; Yu Kang; Guang-Zhong Yang; Zhen Wang; Feng Wang; Yan-Xia Yu; Wen-Ming Chen; Huan-Zhong Shi
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-03-14       Impact factor: 3.673

3.  Chromosome 1 abnormalities and survival of patients with multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents.

Authors:  Smith Giri; Scott F Huntington; Rong Wang; Amer M Zeidan; Nikolai Podoltsev; Steven D Gore; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross; Amy J Davidoff; Natalia Neparidze
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-05-26

4.  Additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with hyperdiploid multiple myeloma: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Adrian A Carballo-Zarate; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Lianghua Fang; Jatin J Shah; Donna M Weber; Sheeba K Thomas; Elisabet E Manasanch; Suyang Hao; Qi Shen; Robert Z Orlowski; Pei Lin; Xinyan Lu
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Amp 1q21 is more predictable with dismal survival than gain 1q21 of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-world analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Tong Wang; Li Bao; Bin Chu; Xiao-Huan Chen; Min-Qiu Lu; Lei Shi; Shan Gao; Li-Juan Fang; Qiu-Qing Xiang; Yue-Hua Ding
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.124

Review 6.  Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Timothy M Schmidt; Rafael Fonseca; Saad Z Usmani
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 11.037

7.  Combination of t(4;14), del(17p13), del(1p32) and 1q21 gain FISH probes identifies clonal heterogeneity and enhances the detection of adverse cytogenetic profiles in 233 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Thomas Smol; Annika Dufour; Sabine Tricot; Mathieu Wemeau; Laure Stalnikiewicz; Franck Bernardi; Christine Terré; Benoît Ducourneau; Hervé Bisiau; Agnès Daudignon
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 8.  European Myeloma Network recommendations on tools for the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple myeloma: what to use and when.

Authors:  Jo Caers; Laurent Garderet; K Martin Kortüm; Michael E O'Dwyer; Niels W C J van de Donk; Mascha Binder; Sandra Maria Dold; Francesca Gay; Jill Corre; Yves Beguin; Heinz Ludwig; Alessandra Larocca; Christoph Driessen; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Mario Boccadoro; Martin Gramatzki; Sonja Zweegman; Hermann Einsele; Michele Cavo; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Pieter Sonneveld; Michel Delforge; Holger W Auner; Evangelos Terpos; Monika Engelhardt
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 9.941

9.  ARNT/HIF-1β links high-risk 1q21 gain and microenvironmental hypoxia to drug resistance and poor prognosis in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Chuan Wu; Ting Yang; Yingmin Liu; Yicheng Lu; Yanping Yang; Xiaobo Liu; Xuelian Liu; Long Ye; Yue Sun; Xue Wang; Qingchao Li; Peiyu Yang; Xiaoyuan Yu; Sujun Gao; Shaji Kumar; Fengyan Jin; Yun Dai; Wei Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  [Effect of 1q21 amplification on bortezomib therapeutic response and prognosis of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients].

Authors:  X L Liu; P Y Yang; X Y Yu; J C Chen; X L Liu; J Bai; Y M Liu; H He; J N Sun; H Q Fan; C Zhang; Y Zhang; K J Su; C S Liu; Y H Tan; S J Gao; W Li; F Y Jin
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2018-05-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.