Literature DB >> 27638366

Outcome of Patients with Multiple Myeloma and CKS1B Gene Amplification after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Fabian Bock1, Gary Lu2, Samer A Srour3, Sameh Gaballa3, Heather Y Lin4, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani4, Medhavi Honhar3, Maximilian Stich3, Nina Das Shah3, Qaiser Bashir3, Krina Patel3, Uday Popat3, Chitra Hosing3, Martin Korbling3, Ruby Delgado3, Gabriela Rondon3, Jatin J Shah2, Sheeba K Thomas5, Elisabet E Manasanch3, Berend Isermann6, Robert Z Orlowski2, Richard E Champlin3, Muzaffar H Qazilbash7.   

Abstract

The gain/amplification of the CKS1B gene on chromosome 1q21 region is associated with a poor outcome in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). However, there are limited data on the outcome of patients with CKS1B amplification after a single high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of patients with CKS1B amplification who received an auto-HCT between June 2012 and July 2014 at our institution. We identified 58 patients with MM and CKS1B gene amplification detected by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). We compared their outcomes with a propensity score-matched control group of 58 patients without CKS1B amplification who were treated at approximately the same time. The primary objective was to compare the progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the CKS1B and the control groups. Stratified log-rank test with the matched pairs as strata and double robust estimation under the Cox model were used to assess the effect of CKS1B gene amplification on PFS or OS in the matched cohort. Patients in the CKS1B and control groups were well matched for age, gender, disease status, year of auto-HCT, response to pretransplantation therapy, and baseline hemoglobin level. In both groups, 57% patients were in first remission and 43% had relapsed disease at auto-HCT. Twenty-seven (47%) patients with CKS1B amplification had concurrent monosomy 13 or 13q deletion; 6 (10%) by conventional cytogenetics only, 16 (28%) by FISH only, and 5 (9%) by both. Median follow-up after auto-HCT was 25.4 months. The median PFS of the CKS1B and the control groups were 15.0 months and 33.0 months (P = .002), respectively. The median OS have not been reached yet. The 2-year OS rates in the CKS1B and the control groups were 62% and 91% (P = .02), respectively. In conclusion, Patients with CKS1B amplification are more likely to have additional high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities and a shorter PFS and OS after an auto-HCT.
Copyright © 2016 The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1q21; CKS1B; Multiple myeloma; Stem cell transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27638366      PMCID: PMC5911156          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  43 in total

1.  A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.

Authors:  Peter C Austin; Paul Grootendorst; Geoffrey M Anderson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003.

Authors:  Peter C Austin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs can overcome some high-risk cytogenetics in multiple myeloma but not gain 1q21.

Authors:  Hareth Nahi; Thea Kristin Våtsveen; Johan Lund; Bart M S Heeg; Birgitte Preiss; Evren Alici; Michael Boe Møller; Karin Fahl Wader; Hanne E H Møller; Lill Anny Grøseth; Brian Østergaard; Hong Yan Dai; Erik Holmberg; Gösta Gahrton; Anders Waage; Niels Abildgaard
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Phase Ib study of panobinostat and bortezomib in relapsed or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jesús F San-Miguel; Paul G Richardson; Andreas Günther; Orhan Sezer; David Siegel; Joan Bladé; Richard LeBlanc; Heather Sutherland; Monika Sopala; Kaushal K Mishra; Song Mu; Priscille M Bourquelot; María Victoria Mateos; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  CKS1B nuclear expression is inversely correlated with p27Kip1 expression and is predictive of an adverse survival in patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Hong Chang; Nan Jiang; Hua Jiang; Manujendra N Saha; Connie Qi; Wei Xu; Donna Reece
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  Phase 1 study of twice-weekly ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Paul G Richardson; Rachid Baz; Michael Wang; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Jacob P Laubach; R Donald Harvey; Moshe Talpaz; Deborah Berg; Guohui Liu; Jiang Yu; Neeraj Gupta; Alessandra Di Bacco; Ai-Min Hui; Sagar Lonial
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P Leif Bergsagel; María-Victoria Mateos; Norma C Gutierrez; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Cyclin kinase subunit 1B nuclear expression predicts an adverse outcome for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib.

Authors:  Mei-Hsi Chen; Connie Qi; Donna Reece; Hong Chang
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.466

9.  Long-term analysis of the IFM 99 trials for myeloma: cytogenetic abnormalities [t(4;14), del(17p), 1q gains] play a major role in defining long-term survival.

Authors:  Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Michel Attal; Loic Campion; Denis Caillot; Cyrille Hulin; Gerald Marit; Anne-Marie Stoppa; Laurent Voillat; Marc Wetterwald; Brigitte Pegourie; Eric Voog; Mourad Tiab; Anne Banos; Jerome Jaubert; Didier Bouscary; Margaret Macro; Brigitte Kolb; Catherine Traulle; Claire Mathiot; Florence Magrangeas; Stephane Minvielle; Thierry Facon; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  Cytogenetic Alterations in Multiple Myeloma: Prognostic Significance and the Choice of Frontline Therapy.

Authors:  Flavia Stella; Estela Pedrazzini; Mara Agazzoni; Oscar Ballester; Irma Slavutsky
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 2.176

View more
  7 in total

1.  Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q abnormalities.

Authors:  Nadine Abdallah; Patricia Greipp; Prashant Kapoor; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Linda B Baughn; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Ronald S Go; Yi L Hwa; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Yi Lin; Nelson Leung; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; Mustaqeem Siddiqui; John Lust; Robert A Kyle; Leif Bergsagel; Rhett Ketterling; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-08-11

Review 2.  Chromosome 1q21 abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Timothy M Schmidt; Rafael Fonseca; Saad Z Usmani
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 3.  Insights on Genomic and Molecular Alterations in Multiple Myeloma and Their Incorporation towards Risk-Adapted Treatment Strategy: Concise Clinical Review.

Authors:  Taiga Nishihori; Kenneth Shain
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 4.  The therapeutic potential of cell cycle targeting in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Anke Maes; Eline Menu; Kim De Veirman; Ken Maes; Karin Vand Erkerken; Elke De Bruyne
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-28

5.  1q21 Gain Combined with High-Risk Factors Is a Heterogeneous Prognostic Factor in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: A Multicenter Study in China.

Authors:  Xiaozhe Li; Wenming Chen; Yin Wu; Jianyong Li; Lijuan Chen; Baijun Fang; Ying Feng; Junru Liu; Meilan Chen; Jingli Gu; Beihui Huang; Juan Li
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-08-27

6.  Gain of 1q21 is an adverse prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients treated by autologous stem cell transplantation: A multicenter study in China.

Authors:  Wen Gao; Yuan Jian; Juan Du; Xiaozhe Li; Huixing Zhou; Zhiyao Zhang; Guangzhong Yang; Guorong Wang; Ying Tian; Yanchen Li; Yin Wu; Weijun Fu; Juan Li; Wenming Chen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 7.  Genetic Abnormalities in Multiple Myeloma: Prognostic and Therapeutic Implications.

Authors:  Ignacio J Cardona-Benavides; Cristina de Ramón; Norma C Gutiérrez
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 6.600

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.