Literature DB >> 28281554

Additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations are associated with inferior clinical outcome in patients with hyperdiploid multiple myeloma: a single-institution experience.

Adrian A Carballo-Zarate1, L Jeffrey Medeiros1, Lianghua Fang1,2, Jatin J Shah3, Donna M Weber3, Sheeba K Thomas3, Elisabet E Manasanch3, Suyang Hao4, Qi Shen5, Robert Z Orlowski3, Pei Lin1, Xinyan Lu1,6.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma is cytogenetically heterogeneous and a hyperdiploid karyotype is considered currently to have standard risk. In this study, we investigated the clinical impact of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations assessed by chromosome analysis in 284 patients with a hyperdiploid karyotype that were subdivided into four groups based on the complexity of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations: group 1, no additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=35); group 2, one additional-structural-chromosomal aberration (n=46); group 3, two additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=39); group 4, ≥three additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (n=164). Clinicopathological data among these groups showed no differences, except patients in group 1 had higher hemoglobin (P=0.031) and albumin (P=0.045) levels. The median follow-up was 55 months (range, 3-221). The median overall survival of patients in groups 1-4 was negatively correlated with the number of the additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations: 98, 76, 61, and 48 months, respectively (P<0.0001). In group 4, CKS1B gain, RB1, or TP53 deletions had no additional impact on overall survival; however, trisomy 3 or 15 conferred a much better overall survival, and monosomy 13 and 14 predicted a worse outcome. In addition, the overall survival of patients in groups 3 and 4 was similar to a subset of high-risk multiple myeloma cases (n=21) (P=0.387). About 192 (67.6%) patients who received stem cell transplantation did not show improved overall survival compared with non-stem cell transplantation patients (n=92; P=0.142) overall; however, they did show significantly improved overall survival in patients with refractory disease in group 4 (P=0.0084). Multivariate analysis showed that two or more additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations (P<0.0001), stages (P=0.02 and P=0.002) and relapsed disease (P=0.009) negatively impacted the overall survival. We conclude that hyperdiploid karyotypes in multiple myeloma are associated with additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations and a greater number of additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations predicts poorer clinical outcome. A hyperdiploid karyotype with ≥2 additional-structural-chromosomal aberrations at chromosomal level should be considered an independent high-risk factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28281554     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  39 in total

1.  Concomitant gain of 1q21 and MYC translocation define a poor prognostic subgroup of hyperdiploid multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Niels Weinhold; Desiree Kirn; Anja Seckinger; Thomas Hielscher; Martin Granzow; Uta Bertsch; Gerlinde Egerer; Hans Salwender; Igor W Blau; Katja Weisel; Jens Hillengass; Marc S Raab; Dirk Hose; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Anna Jauch
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 9.941

2.  Detection of chromosome 13 (13q14) deletion among Sudanese patients with multiple myeloma using a molecular genetics fluorescent in situ hybridization technique (FISH).

Authors:  Amar A Dowd; Suzan Homeida; Haram Awad Elkarem
Journal:  Malays J Pathol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 0.656

3.  Phase I dose escalation trial of the novel proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib in patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma.

Authors:  Farrukh T Awan; Joseph M Flynn; Jeffrey A Jones; Leslie A Andritsos; Kami J Maddocks; Ellen J Sass; Margaret S Lucas; Weihong Chase; Sharon Waymer; Yonghua Ling; Yao Jiang; Mitch A Phelps; John C Byrd; David M Lucas; Jennifer A Woyach
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-03-11

4.  Proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs can overcome some high-risk cytogenetics in multiple myeloma but not gain 1q21.

Authors:  Hareth Nahi; Thea Kristin Våtsveen; Johan Lund; Bart M S Heeg; Birgitte Preiss; Evren Alici; Michael Boe Møller; Karin Fahl Wader; Hanne E H Møller; Lill Anny Grøseth; Brian Østergaard; Hong Yan Dai; Erik Holmberg; Gösta Gahrton; Anders Waage; Niels Abildgaard
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Improving overall survival and overcoming adverse prognosis in the treatment of cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P Leif Bergsagel; María-Victoria Mateos; Norma C Gutierrez; S Vincent Rajkumar; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Multiple myeloma maintenance therapy: a review of the pharmacologic treatment.

Authors:  Brandon R Shank; Victoria T Brown; Rowena N Schwartz
Journal:  J Oncol Pharm Pract       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 1.809

7.  Trisomies in multiple myeloma: impact on survival in patients with high-risk cytogenetics.

Authors:  Shaji Kumar; Rafael Fonseca; Rhett P Ketterling; Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Morie A Gertz; Suzanne R Hayman; Francis K Buadi; David Dingli; Ryan A Knudson; Alexandra Greenberg; Stephen J Russell; Steven R Zeldenrust; John A Lust; Robert A Kyle; Leif Bergsagel; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Ploidy, as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization, defines different subgroups in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S Wuilleme; N Robillard; L Lodé; F Magrangeas; H Beris; J-L Harousseau; J Proffitt; S Minvielle; H Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Revised International Staging System for Multiple Myeloma: A Report From International Myeloma Working Group.

Authors:  Antonio Palumbo; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Stefania Oliva; Henk M Lokhorst; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Laura Rosinol; Paul Richardson; Simona Caltagirone; Juan José Lahuerta; Thierry Facon; Sara Bringhen; Francesca Gay; Michel Attal; Roberto Passera; Andrew Spencer; Massimo Offidani; Shaji Kumar; Pellegrino Musto; Sagar Lonial; Maria T Petrucci; Robert Z Orlowski; Elena Zamagni; Gareth Morgan; Meletios A Dimopoulos; Brian G M Durie; Kenneth C Anderson; Pieter Sonneveld; Jésus San Miguel; Michele Cavo; S Vincent Rajkumar; Philippe Moreau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 10.  p53 abnormalities and potential therapeutic targeting in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  P J Teoh; W J Chng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  3 in total

1.  Hyperdiploid Multiple Myeloma with Novel Complex Structural Chromosome Abnormalities Associated with Poor Prognosis : A Rare Case Report.

Authors:  Ravindran Ankathil; Eva Foong; Ismail Siti-Mariam; Ramli Norhidayah; Mohd Yunus Nazihah; Vijay Sangeetha; Sreedharan Hariharan; Husin Azlan
Journal:  Int J Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Res       Date:  2021-07-01

2.  Clinicopathological Characteristics of Hyperdiploidy with High-Risk Cytogenetics in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Naery Yang; Yeung Chul Mun; Chu Myong Seong; Hee Jin Huh; Jungwon Huh
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 3.  MDM2/X inhibitors under clinical evaluation: perspectives for the management of hematological malignancies and pediatric cancer.

Authors:  Veronica Tisato; Rebecca Voltan; Arianna Gonelli; Paola Secchiero; Giorgio Zauli
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 17.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.