| Literature DB >> 30171031 |
Jo Caers1,2, Laurent Garderet3, K Martin Kortüm4, Michael E O'Dwyer5, Niels W C J van de Donk6, Mascha Binder7, Sandra Maria Dold8, Francesca Gay9, Jill Corre10, Yves Beguin11,2, Heinz Ludwig12, Alessandra Larocca9, Christoph Driessen13, Meletios A Dimopoulos14, Mario Boccadoro9, Martin Gramatzki15, Sonja Zweegman6, Hermann Einsele4, Michele Cavo16, Hartmut Goldschmidt17,18, Pieter Sonneveld19, Michel Delforge20, Holger W Auner21, Evangelos Terpos14, Monika Engelhardt8.
Abstract
The diagnosis of multiple myeloma can be challenging, even for experienced physicians, and requires close collaboration between numerous disciplines (orthopedics, radiology, nuclear medicine, radiation therapy, hematology and oncology) before the final diagnosis of myeloma is made. The definition of multiple myeloma is based on the presence of clinical, biochemical, histopathological, and radiological markers of disease. Specific tests are needed both at presentation and during follow-up in order to reach the correct diagnosis and characterize the disease precisely. These tests can also serve prognostic purposes and are useful for follow-up of myeloma patients. Molecular analyses remain pivotal for defining high-risk myeloma and are used in updated patient stratifications, while minimal residual disease assessment via flow cytometry, molecular techniques and radiological approaches provides additional prognostic information on patients' long-term outcome. This pivotal information will guide our future treatment decisions in forthcoming clinical trials. The European Myeloma Network group updated their guidelines on different diagnostic recommendations, which should be of value to enable appropriate use of the recommendations both at diagnosis and during follow-up. CopyrightEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30171031 PMCID: PMC6278986 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2018.189159
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Haematologica ISSN: 0390-6078 Impact factor: 9.941