Literature DB >> 25771757

Clinical decision rule for primary care patient with acute low back pain at risk of developing chronic pain.

Wolf E Mehling1, Mark H Ebell2, Andrew L Avins3, Frederick M Hecht4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Primary care clinicians need to identify candidates for early interventions to prevent patients with acute pain from developing chronic pain.
PURPOSE: We conducted a 2-year prospective cohort study of risk factors for the progression to chronic pain and developed and internally validated a clinical decision rule (CDR) that stratifies patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups for chronic pain. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: This is a prospective cohort study in primary care. PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients with acute low back pain (LBP, ≤30 days duration) were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were self-reported perceived nonrecovery and chronic pain.
METHODS: Patients were surveyed at baseline, 6 months, and 2 years. We conducted bivariate and multivariate regression analyses of demographic, clinical, and psychosocial variables for chronic pain outcomes, developed a CDR, and assessed its performance by calculating the bootstrapped areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and likelihood ratios.
RESULTS: Six hundred five patients enrolled: 13% had chronic pain at 6 months and 19% at 2 years. An eight-item CDR was most parsimonious for classifying patients into three risk levels. Bootstrapped AUC was 0.76 (0.70-0.82) for the 6-month CDR. Each 10-point score increase (60-point range) was associated with an odds ratio of 11.1 (10.8-11.4) for developing chronic pain. Using a less than 5% probability of chronic pain as the cutoff for low risk and a greater than 40% probability for high risk, likelihood ratios were 0.26 (0.14-0.48) and 4.4 (3.0-6.3) for these groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A CDR was developed that may help primary care clinicians classify patients with strictly defined acute LBP into low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups for developing chronic pain and performed acceptably in 1,000 bootstrapped replications. Validation in a separate sample is needed.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute pain; Chronic pain; Clinical decision rule; Low back pain; Prediction; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25771757      PMCID: PMC4475413          DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  42 in total

1.  Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain.

Authors:  S J Linton; K Halldén
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 2.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.

Authors:  A Laupacis; N Sekar; I G Stiell
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-02-12       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Validation of the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory.

Authors:  H D Hadjistavropoulos; F K MacLeod; G J Asmundson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Kenneth F Schulz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Apr 23-29       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.

Authors:  Steven J Linton; Katja Boersma
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.

Authors:  A J H M Beurskens; H C W de Vet; A J A Köke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values.

Authors:  Henrica C W de Vet; Berend Terluin; Dirk L Knol; Leo D Roorda; Lidwine B Mokkink; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Erik J M Hendriks; Lex M Bouter; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 9.  Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis.

Authors:  Liset H M Pengel; Robert D Herbert; Chris G Maher; Kathryn M Refshauge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-09

10.  Superior analgesic effect of an active distraction versus pleasant unfamiliar sounds and music: the influence of emotion and cognitive style.

Authors:  Eduardo A Garza Villarreal; Elvira Brattico; Lene Vase; Leif Østergaard; Peter Vuust
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Individual recovery expectations and prognosis of outcomes in non-specific low back pain: prognostic factor review.

Authors:  Jill A Hayden; Maria N Wilson; Richard D Riley; Ross Iles; Tamar Pincus; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-25

2.  Comparison of Low Back Pain Recovery and Persistence: A Descriptive Study of Characteristics at Pain Onset.

Authors:  Angela R Starkweather; Debra E Lyon; Patricia Kinser; Amy Heineman; Jamie L Sturgill; Xiaoyan Deng; Umaporn Siangphoe; R K Elswick; Joel Greenspan; Susan G Dorsey
Journal:  Biol Res Nurs       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.522

Review 3.  [Psychosocial risk factors for chronic back pain in the general population and in competitive sports : From theory to clinical screening-a review from the MiSpEx network].

Authors:  M I Hasenbring; C Levenig; D Hallner; A-K Puschmann; A Weiffen; J Kleinert; J Belz; M Schiltenwolf; A-C Pfeifer; J Heidari; M Kellmann; P-M Wippert
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.107

4.  Getting "Unstuck": A Multi-Site Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Intervention Program for Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Timothy Clark; Jean Claude Wakim; Carl Noe
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2016-06-14

5.  Early Factors Associated with the Development of Chronic Pain in Trauma Patients.

Authors:  Raoul Daoust; Jean Paquet; Lynne Moore; Marcel Émond; Sophie Gosselin; Gilles Lavigne; Manon Choinière; Aline Boulanger; Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong; Jean-Marc Chauny
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.037

6.  Development and internal validation of a machine learning prediction model for low back pain non-recovery in patients with an acute episode consulting a physiotherapist in primary care.

Authors:  J Knoop; W van Lankveld; L Beijer; F J B Geerdink; M W Heymans; T J Hoogeboom; S Hoppenbrouwers; E van Overmeeren; R Soer; C Veenhof; K C P Vissers; P J van der Wees; M Sappelli; J B Staal
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 7.  Outcomes indicators and a risk classification system for spinal manipulation under anesthesia: a narrative review and proposal.

Authors:  Dennis DiGiorgi; John L Cerf; Daniel S Bowerman
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-03-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.