RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate segmentation of brain tumors, and quantification of tumor volume, is important for diagnosis, monitoring, and planning therapeutic intervention. Manual segmentation is not widely used because of time constraints. Previous efforts have mainly produced methods that are tailored to a particular type of tumor or acquisition protocol and have mostly failed to produce a method that functions on different tumor types and is robust to changes in scanning parameters, resolution, and image quality, thereby limiting their clinical value. Herein, we present a semiautomatic method for tumor segmentation that is fast, accurate, and robust to a wide variation in image quality and resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A semiautomatic segmentation method based on the geodesic distance transform was developed and validated by using it to segment 54 brain tumors. Glioblastomas, meningiomas, and brain metastases were segmented. Qualitative validation was based on physician ratings provided by three clinical experts. Quantitative validation was based on comparing semiautomatic and manual segmentations. RESULTS: Tumor segmentations obtained using manual and automatic methods were compared quantitatively using the Dice measure of overlap. Subjective evaluation was performed by having human experts rate the computerized segmentations on a 0-5 rating scale where 5 indicated perfect segmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method addresses a significant, unmet need in the field of neuro-oncology. Specifically, this method enables clinicians to obtain accurate and reproducible tumor volumes without the need for manual segmentation.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate segmentation of brain tumors, and quantification of tumor volume, is important for diagnosis, monitoring, and planning therapeutic intervention. Manual segmentation is not widely used because of time constraints. Previous efforts have mainly produced methods that are tailored to a particular type of tumor or acquisition protocol and have mostly failed to produce a method that functions on different tumor types and is robust to changes in scanning parameters, resolution, and image quality, thereby limiting their clinical value. Herein, we present a semiautomatic method for tumor segmentation that is fast, accurate, and robust to a wide variation in image quality and resolution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A semiautomatic segmentation method based on the geodesic distance transform was developed and validated by using it to segment 54 brain tumors. Glioblastomas, meningiomas, and brain metastases were segmented. Qualitative validation was based on physician ratings provided by three clinical experts. Quantitative validation was based on comparing semiautomatic and manual segmentations. RESULTS:Tumor segmentations obtained using manual and automatic methods were compared quantitatively using the Dice measure of overlap. Subjective evaluation was performed by having human experts rate the computerized segmentations on a 0-5 rating scale where 5 indicated perfect segmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed method addresses a significant, unmet need in the field of neuro-oncology. Specifically, this method enables clinicians to obtain accurate and reproducible tumor volumes without the need for manual segmentation.
Authors: A G Sorensen; S Patel; C Harmath; S Bridges; J Synnott; A Sievers; Y H Yoon; E J Lee; M C Yang; R F Lewis; G J Harris; M Lev; P W Schaefer; B R Buchbinder; G Barest; K Yamada; J Ponzo; H Y Kwon; J Gemmete; J Farkas; A L Tievsky; R B Ziegler; M R Salhus; R Weisskoff Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-01-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: K D Hopper; C J Kasales; K D Eggli; T R TenHave; N M Belman; P S Potok; M A Van Slyke; G J Olt; P Close; A Lipton; H A Harvey; J S Hartzel Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1996 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: M Brada; K Hoang-Xuan; R Rampling; P Y Dietrich; L Y Dirix; D Macdonald; J J Heimans; B A Zonnenberg; J M Bravo-Marques; R Henriksson; R Stupp; N Yue; J Bruner; M Dugan; S Rao; S Zaknoen Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Ali Gooya; Kilian M Pohl; Michel Bilello; Luigi Cirillo; George Biros; Elias R Melhem; Christos Davatzikos Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2012-08-13 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Teri N Kreisl; Lyndon Kim; Kraig Moore; Paul Duic; Cheryl Royce; Irene Stroud; Nancy Garren; Megan Mackey; John A Butman; Kevin Camphausen; John Park; Paul S Albert; Howard A Fine Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-12-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Kamran Ahrar; Judy U Ahrar; Sanaz Javadi; Li Pan; Denái R Milton; Christopher G Wood; Surena F Matin; R Jason Stafford Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Karl Lindberg; Angelica Kouti; Doerthe Ziegelitz; Tobias Hallén; Thomas Skoglund; Dan Farahmand Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2018-01-19
Authors: S M Reza Soroushmehr; Pavani Davuluri; Somayeh Molaei; Rosalyn Hobson Hargraves; Yang Tang; Charles H Cockrell; Kevin Ward; Kayvan Najarian Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2015-07-25 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Zev A Binder; Amy Haseley Thorne; Spyridon Bakas; E Paul Wileyto; Michel Bilello; Hamed Akbari; Saima Rathore; Sung Min Ha; Logan Zhang; Cole J Ferguson; Sonika Dahiya; Wenya Linda Bi; David A Reardon; Ahmed Idbaih; Joerg Felsberg; Bettina Hentschel; Michael Weller; Stephen J Bagley; Jennifer J D Morrissette; MacLean P Nasrallah; Jianhui Ma; Ciro Zanca; Andrew M Scott; Laura Orellana; Christos Davatzikos; Frank B Furnari; Donald M O'Rourke Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Spyridon Bakas; Hamed Akbari; Aristeidis Sotiras; Michel Bilello; Martin Rozycki; Justin S Kirby; John B Freymann; Keyvan Farahani; Christos Davatzikos Journal: Sci Data Date: 2017-09-05 Impact factor: 6.444
Authors: Carlito Lagman; John P Sheppard; Joel S Beckett; Alexander M Tucker; Daniel T Nagasawa; Giyarpuram N Prashant; Alyssa Ziman; Isaac Yang Journal: J Neurol Surg B Skull Base Date: 2018-05-14
Authors: Bilwaj Gaonkar; Yihao Xia; Diane S Villaroman; Allison Ko; Mark Attiah; Joel S Beckett; Luke Macyszyn Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 3.316