Literature DB >> 29018631

Multi-Parameter Ensemble Learning for Automated Vertebral Body Segmentation in Heterogeneously Acquired Clinical MR Images.

Bilwaj Gaonkar1, Yihao Xia1, Diane S Villaroman1, Allison Ko1, Mark Attiah1, Joel S Beckett1, Luke Macyszyn1.   

Abstract

The development of quantitative imaging biomarkers in medicine requires automatic delineation of relevant anatomical structures using available imaging data. However, this task is complicated in clinical medicine due to the variation in scanning parameters and protocols, even within a single medical center. Existing literature on automatic image segmentation using MR data is based on the analysis of highly homogenous images obtained using a fixed set of pulse sequence parameters (TR/TE). Unfortunately, algorithms that operate on fixed scanning parameters do not avail themselves to real-world daily clinical use due to the existing variation in scanning parameters and protocols. Thus, it is necessary to develop algorithmic techniques that can address the challenge of MR image segmentation using real clinical data. Toward this goal, we developed a multi-parametric ensemble learning technique to automatically detect and segment lumbar vertebral bodies using MR images of the spine. We use spine imaging data to illustrate our techniques since low back pain is an extremely common condition and a typical spine clinic evaluates patients that have been referred with a wide range of scanning parameters. This method was designed with special emphasis on robustness so that it can perform well despite the inherent variation in scanning protocols. Specifically, we show how a single multi-parameter ensemble model trained with manually labeled T2 scans can autonomously segment vertebral bodies on scans with echo times varying between 24 and 147 ms and relaxation times varying between 1500 and 7810 ms. Furthermore, even though the model was trained using T2-MR imaging data, it can accurately segment vertebral bodies on T1-MR and CT, further demonstrating the robustness and versatility of our methodology. We believe that robust segmentation techniques, such as the one presented here, are necessary for translating computer assisted diagnosis into everyday clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Super pixels; ensemble learning; lumbar spine segmentation; robust segmentation

Year:  2017        PMID: 29018631      PMCID: PMC5515511          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2017.2717982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  23 in total

1.  Labeling of lumbar discs using both pixel- and object-level features with a two-level probabilistic model.

Authors:  Raja' S Alomari; Jason J Corso; Vipin Chaudhary
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases.

Authors:  D A Stainforth; T Aina; C Christensen; M Collins; N Faull; D J Frame; J A Kettleborough; S Knight; A Martin; J M Murphy; C Piani; D Sexton; L A Smith; R A Spicer; A J Thorpe; M R Allen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Random walks for image segmentation.

Authors:  Leo Grady
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.226

4.  Texture analysis for automatic segmentation of intervertebral disks of scoliotic spines from MR images.

Authors:  Claudia Chevrefils; Farida Cheriet; Carl-Eric Aubin; Guy Grimard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2009-04-14

5.  Multi-atlas skull-stripping.

Authors:  Jimit Doshi; Guray Erus; Yangming Ou; Bilwaj Gaonkar; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data.

Authors:  J G Sled; A P Zijdenbos; A C Evans
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Robust MR spine detection using hierarchical learning and local articulated model.

Authors:  Yiqiang Zhan; Dewan Maneesh; Martin Harder; Xiang Sean Zhou
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2012

8.  N4ITK: improved N3 bias correction.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tustison; Brian B Avants; Philip A Cook; Yuanjie Zheng; Alexander Egan; Paul A Yushkevich; James C Gee
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Cube-cut: vertebral body segmentation in MRI-data through cubic-shaped divergences.

Authors:  Robert Schwarzenberg; Bernd Freisleben; Christopher Nimsky; Jan Egger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Automated Segmentation of Tissues Using CT and MRI: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Laura Heacock; Ashley A Weaver; Robert D Boutin; Tessa S Cook; Jason Itri; Christopher G Filippi; Rao P Gullapalli; James Lee; Marianna Zagurovskaya; Tara Retson; Kendra Godwin; Joey Nicholson; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 2.  Utility of machine learning algorithms in degenerative cervical and lumbar spine disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mark E Stephens; Christen M O'Neal; Alison M Westrup; Fauziyya Y Muhammad; Daniel M McKenzie; Andrew H Fagg; Zachary A Smith
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.042

3.  Quantitative Analysis of Neural Foramina in the Lumbar Spine: An Imaging Informatics and Machine Learning Study.

Authors:  Bilwaj Gaonkar; Joel Beckett; Diane Villaroman; Christine Ahn; Matthew Edwards; Steven Moran; Mark Attiah; Diana Babayan; Christopher Ames; J Pablo Villablanca; Noriko Salamon; Alex Bui; Luke Macyszyn
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-03-06

4.  Quantitative Analysis of Spinal Canal Areas in the Lumbar Spine: An Imaging Informatics and Machine Learning Study.

Authors:  B Gaonkar; D Villaroman; J Beckett; C Ahn; M Attiah; D Babayan; J P Villablanca; N Salamon; A Bui; L Macyszyn
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.966

5.  Multi-scanner and multi-modal lumbar vertebral body and intervertebral disc segmentation database.

Authors:  Yasmina Al Khalil; Edoardo A Becherucci; Jan S Kirschke; Dimitrios C Karampinos; Marcel Breeuwer; Thomas Baum; Nico Sollmann
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 6.444

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.