| Literature DB >> 25769032 |
Raimundo da Silva1, Ivana Veneza1, Iracilda Sampaio2, Juliana Araripe2, Horacio Schneider2, Grazielle Gomes3.
Abstract
In the present study, five loci (mitochondrial and nuclear) were sequenced to determine the genetic diversity, population structure, and demographic history of populations of the yellowtail snapper, Ocyurus chrysurus, found along the coast of the western South Atlantic. O. chrysurus is a lutjanid species that is commonly associated with coral reefs and exhibits an ample geographic distribution, and it can therefore be considered a good model for the investigation of phylogeographic patterns and genetic connectivity in marine environments. The results reflected a marked congruence between the mitochondrial and nuclear markers as well as intense gene flow among the analyzed populations, which represent a single genetic stock along the entire coast of Brazil between the states of Pará and Espírito Santo. Our data also showed high levels of genetic diversity in the species (mainly mtDNA), as well a major historic population expansion, which most likely coincided with the sea level oscillations at the end of the Pleistocene. In addition, this species is intensively exploited by commercial fisheries, and data on the genetic structure of its populations will be essential for the development of effective conservation and management plans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25769032 PMCID: PMC4359153 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122173
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Map of collection locations for the present study.
Distribution of the localities on the coast of Brazil from which the Ocyurus chrysurus specimens were collected for the present study, as well as location of Belize, previously sampled by Vasconcellos et al.[16].
Primers used in the present study for Brazilian Ocyurus chrysurus.
| Marker | Primers | Reference | Sequence (5’-3’) | Annealing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR | Dloop-A | Lee et al.[ | TTCCACCTCTAACTCCCAAAGCTAG | 57°C |
| Dloop-G | Lee et al.[ | CGTCGGATCCCATCTTCAGTGTTATGCTT | ||
| Cyt b | FishCybF | Sevilla et al. [ | ACCACCGTTGTTATTCAACTACAAGAAC | 54°C |
| TrucCytbR | Sevilla et al. [ | CCGACTTCCGGATTACAAGACCG | ||
| IGF 2 | FCmugilF | Rodrigues-Filho [ | GTTCACAGCGCCACACAGAC | 64°C |
| FCmugilR | Rodrigues-Filho [ | CTTGAAGGATGAATGACTATGTCCA | ||
| GH 5 | GH5F | Hassan et al. [ | AGGCCAATCAGGACGGAGC | 57°C |
| GH6R | Hassan et al. [ | TGCCACTGTCAGATAAGTCTCC | ||
| ANT 1 | ANTF1 | Jarman et al. [ | TGCTTCGTNTACCCVCTKGACTTTGC | 56°C |
| ANTR1 | Jarman et al. [ | CCAGACTGCATCATCATKCGRCGDC |
*Primers used for sequencing.
Genetic Diversity and statistics of neutrality for the Brazilian Ocyurus chrysurus populations analyzed in the present study.
| Locus/Locality | N | Unique haplotypes | Nh | S | h (sd) | π (%) | Tajima’s | Fu’s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| PA | 30 | 16 | 26 | 50 | 0.983 (0.016) | 1.79 | −0.55 ns | −12.16 |
| MA | 11 | 7 | 8 | 36 | 0.890 (0.091) | 1.56 | −1.10 ns | 0.10 ns |
| CE | 31 | 17 | 26 | 61 | 0.982 (0.015) | 2.01 | −0.79 ns | −9.94 |
| RN | 22 | 11 | 18 | 50 | 0.956 (0.036) | 1.77 | −0.88 ns | −5.04(0.029) |
| PB | 21 | 7 | 17 | 51 | 0.966 (0.030) | 1.90 | −0.79 ns | −3.95 ns |
| PE | 22 | 7 | 15 | 39 | 0.943 (0.035) | 1.50 | −0.61 ns | −2.42 ns |
| BA | 8 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 0.928 (0.084) | 1.93 | 0.83 ns | 1.23 ns |
| ES | 7 | 3 | 7 | 34 | 1 (0.076) | 2.15 | −0.38 ns | −1.12 ns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| PA | 29 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0.615 (0.052) | 0.12 | −1.04 ns | −1.29 ns |
| MA | 16 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0.791 (0.076) | 0.21 | −1.19 ns | −2.89 |
| CE | 31 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0.707 (0.054) | 0.18 | −0.64 ns | −1.15 ns |
| RN | 24 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0.731 (0.064) | 0.17 | −1.23 ns | −2.69(0.027) |
| PB | 23 | - | 4 | 5 | 0.557 (0.083) | 0.12 | −1.22 ns | −0.40 ns |
| PE | 25 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0.616 (0.063) | 0.14 | −0.38 ns | 0 ns |
| BA | 10 | - | 3 | 2 | 0.711 (0.086) | 0.13 | 0.83 ns | 0.25 ns |
| ES | 12 | - | 3 | 3 | 0.621 (0.103) | 0.13 | −0.04 ns | 0.39 ns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| PA | 22 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.811 (0.040) | 1.43 | 1.95 ns | 0.70 ns |
| MA | 15 | - | 7 | 14 | 0.735 (0.054) | 1.39 | 1.84 ns | 3.40 ns |
| CE | 27 | 4 | 14 | 14 | 0.808 (0.035) | 1.39 | 2.36 ns | −0.01 ns |
| RN | 21 | 1 | 11 | 15 | 0.815 (0.038) | 1.44 | 2.25 ns | 1.25 ns |
| PB | 18 | 1 | 12 | 15 | 0.712 (0.069) | 1.30 | 1.35 ns | −0.28 ns |
| PE | 8 | - | 4 | 10 | 0.691 (0.073) | 1.37 | 2.96 ns | 5.11 ns |
| BA | 8 | 2 | 8 | 14 | 0.891 (0.047) | 1.37 | 1.08 ns | 0.26 ns |
| ES | 11 | - | 6 | 11 | 0.757 (0.074) | 1.21 | 2.00 ns | 2.80 ns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| PA | 26 | - | 5 | 4 | 0.451 (0.079) | 0.45 | −0.20ns | −0.66 ns |
| MA | 12 | - | 5 | 5 | 0.626 (0.093) | 0.80 | 0.87 ns | 0.01 ns |
| CE | 33 | - | 4 | 3 | 0.489 (0.067) | 0.52 | 0.89 ns | 0.88 ns |
| RN | 25 | - | 4 | 4 | 0.433 (0.079) | 0.41 | −0.41 ns | 0.06 ns |
| PB | 23 | - | 4 | 3 | 0.588 (0.068) | 0.66 | 1.52 ns | 1.26 ns |
| PE | 13 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0.624 (0.086) | 0.84 | 0.36 ns | 0.242 ns |
| BA | 7 | - | 3 | 3 | 0.483 (0.142) | 0.54 | 0.07 ns | 0.78 ns |
| ES | 11 | - | 4 | 3 | 0.463 (0.119) | 0.55 | 0.50 ns | 0.05 ns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| PA | 26 | - | 2 | 1 | 0.110 (0.057) | 0.03 | −0.66 ns | −0.45 ns |
| MA | 11 | - | 1 | 0 | 0.000 (0) | 0.00 | 0 ns | 0 ns |
| CE | 33 | - | 2 | 1 | 0.192 (0.059) | 0.06 | −0.10 ns | 0.35 ns |
| RN | 24 | - | 2 | 1 | 0.119 (0.061) | 0.03 | −0.63 ns | −0.38 ns |
| PB | 21 | - | 2 | 1 | 0.135 (0.068) | 0.04 | −0.58 ns | −0.26 ns |
| PE | 7 | - | 2 | 1 | 0.142 (0.118) | 0.04 | −1.15 ns | −0.59 ns |
| BA | 8 | - | 1 | 0 | 0.000 (0) | 0.00 | 0 ns | 0 ns |
| ES | 12 | - | 1 | 0 | 0.000 (0) | 0.00 | 0 ns | 0 ns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acronyms: N = number of specimens, Nh = number of haplotypes, S = number of segregating sites, h = haplotype diversity, π = nucleotide diversity.
*p< 0.05 (for Fs < 0.02)
**p< 0.01; ns = not significant; PA: Pará; MA: Maranhão; CE: Ceará; RN: Rio Grande do Norte; PB: Paraíba; PE: Pernambuco; BA: Bahia; Espírito Santo.
Analysis of Molecular Variance for the Brazilian O. chrysurus populations.
| C R | Variance | Variation (%) | Ф |
|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups (Brazil x Belize) | 2.70579 | 32.92262 | 0.32923 |
| Among groups/ Within groups | −0.07523 | −0.91533 | −0.01365 |
| Within of populations | 5.58807 | 67.99271 | 0.32007 |
|
| |||
| Among populations | −0.06248 | −1.15973 | −0.01160ns |
| Within of populations | 5.44961 | 101.15973 | |
|
| |||
| Among populations | −0.01012 | −2.08757 | −0.02088 ns |
| Within of populations | 0.49468 | 102.08757 | |
|
| |||
| Among populations | −0.00912 | −1.32 | −0.01324 ns |
| Within of populations | 0.69809 | 101.32 |
Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) for the Brazilian O. chrysurus populations analyzed in the present study, for control Region (Brazil/ Belize), Control Region (only Brazil), Cytochrome b, and nuDNA (intragenic markers –IGF 2; GH 5; ANT 1).
**- p< 0.01; ns = not significant
1 Due to the similar pattern obtained for each marker individually, we chose to show only the of the results analysis multiloci.
Matrix of pairwise Fst values for the Brazilian populations of O. chrysurus.
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| - | ||||||||
|
|
| - | |||||||
|
|
|
| - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
| - | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| - | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| - | ||||||||
|
|
| - | |||||||
|
|
|
| - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
| - | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| - | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | |
|
| |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| - | ||||||||
|
|
| - | |||||||
|
|
|
| - | ||||||
|
|
|
|
| - | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
| - | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| - |
Matrix of pairwise Fst values for the Brazilian populations of O. chrysurus analyzed in the present study, for control Region, Cytochrome b, and nuDNA (intragenic markers—IGF 2; GH 5; ANT 1). Acronyms: BE- Belize, PA- Pará, MA- Maranhão, CE- Ceará, RN- Rio Grande do Norte, PB- Paraíba, PE- Pernambuco, BA- Bahia, ES- Espírito Santo
**- p = 0
*ns = -p<0.05, however non-significant after FDR
ns- Not significant
1- Due to the similar pattern obtained for each marker individually, we chose to show only the of the results analysis multiloci.
Fig 2Genetic relationships among haplotypes found in the Brazilian Ocyurus chrysurus populations.
Estimated by the maximum parsimony method, for the sequences of the Control Region, Cytochrome b, IGF 2, GH 5, and ANT. Each haplotype is represented by a circle, and the frequency of each haplotype proportional to the scale shown. Colors refer to the origin of each sample analyzed.
Fig 3Skyline plots for Brazilian Ocyurus chrysurus.
A. Based on the Control Region sequences (Bayesian Skyline plot). B. Extended Bayesian Skyline plot for the Brazilian Ocyurus chrysurus populations. Both are based on a mutation rate of 10% per million years (between lineages).
Fig 4Distribution of the pairwise differences between haplotypes for Ocyurus chrysurus from the coast of Brazil.
On the y axis the number of proportional differences is presented. X-axis represents the number of differences between pairs of sequences. Bars correspond to the observed values, and the dotted lines represent the proposed model for exponential growth.