| Literature DB >> 25763104 |
Giuliana d'Ippolito1, Angela Sardo1, Debora Paris1, Filomena Monica Vella1, Maria Grazia Adelfi1, Pierpaolo Botte1, Carmela Gallo1, Angelo Fontana1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diatoms are an ecologically relevant group of microalgae that are not commonly considered for bio-oil production even if they are responsible for massive blooms at sea. Seventeen diatom species were screened for their capacity to produce biomass and lipids, in relation to their growth rate. Triglyceride levels were also assessed as a preferential source of biofuels.Entities:
Keywords: Bioenergy; Biofuels; Diatoms; Lipid metabolism; Microalgae
Year: 2015 PMID: 25763104 PMCID: PMC4355990 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0212-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Chemical and biochemical parameters analyzed in cultures of 17 marine diatoms compared to other marine microalgae
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacillariophyceae |
| 7 | 18 | 13.22 ± 0.66 | 1.97 ± 0.04 | 14.86 ± 0.31 | 100 | ― | ― | ― |
|
| 7 | 16 | 2.47 ± 0.07 | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 7.63 ± 0.23 | 100 | ― | ― | ― | |
|
| 7 | 17 | 4.13 ± 0.17 | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 12.11 ± 0.30 | 100 | ― | ― | ― | |
|
| 7 | 17 | 5.44 ± 0.33 | 0.43 ± 0.01 | 7.95 ± 0.26 | 100 | ― | ― | ― | |
|
| 7 | 19 | 4.35 ± 0.22 | 0.54 ± 0.02 | 12.42 ± 0.37 | 100 | ― | ― | ― | |
|
| 6 | 16 | 24.29 ± 0.97 | 7.27 ± 0.28 | 29.94 ± 1.17 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 51.0 ± 3.2 | 30.0 ± 1.0 | 16.0 ± 1.0 | |
|
| 6 | 22 | 12.53 ± 0.44 | 4.87 ± 0.10 | 38.84 ± 0.78 | 8.0 ± 0.3 | 53.0 ± 1.9 | 21.0 ± 1.3 | 18.0 ± 1.1 | |
|
| 6 | 24 | 14.84 ± 0.45 | 3.48 ± 0.10 | 23.48 ± 0.66 | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 45.0 ± 3.2 | 31.0 ± 1.3 | 19.0 ± 1.1 | |
|
| 8 | 24 | 5.87 ± 0.24 | 1.72 ± 0.07 | 29.33 ± 1.17 | 5.0 ± 0.3 | 19.0 ± 0.9 | 55.0 ± 1.8 | 21.0 ± 1.0 | |
|
| 13 | 48 | 7.11 ± 0.14 | 2.98 ± 0.09 | 41.97 ± 1.26 | 0 | 55.0 ± 2.1 | 24.0 ± 1.7 | 21.0 ± 1.0 | |
|
| 7 | 23 | 9.02 ± 0.54 | 0.85 ± 0.02 | 9.38 ± 0.23 | 100 | ― | ― | ― | |
|
| 7 | 16 | 7.17 ± 0.27 | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 9.14 ± 0.43 | 100 | ― | ― | ― | |
|
| 7 | 15 | 27.27 ± 1.09 | 4.78 ± 0.18 | 17.51 ± 0.67 | 7.0 ± 0.2 | 18.0 ± 0.7 | 54.0 ± 3.2 | 21.0 ± 0.5 | |
|
| 11 | 29 | 22.44 ± 0.90 | 2.09 ± 0.06 | 9.32 ± 0.28 | 11.0 ± 0.7 | 19.0 ± 0.6 | 44.0 ± 2.1 | 26.0 ± 1.0 | |
|
| 10 | 15 | 4.12 ± 0.11 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 13.50 ± 0.81 | 100 | ― | ― | ― | |
|
| 12 | 34 | 4.66 ± 0.28 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 12.20 ± 0.71 | 52.0 ± 3.6 | ― | 19.0 ± 0.8 | 29.0 ± 1.8 | |
|
| 10 | 25 | 9.10 ± 0.44 | 1.88 ± 0.11 | 20.60 ± 1.24 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 29.0 ± 1.8 | 38.0 ± 1.2 | 31.0 ± 1.9 | |
| Eustigmatophyceae |
| 21 | 44 | 33.09 ± 1.16 | 7.27 ± 0.31 | 21.98 ± 0.92 | 14.0 ± 0.5 | 20.0 ± 0.5 | 39.0 ± 2.3 | 27.0 ± 1.6 |
| Chlorophyceae |
| 20 | 83 | 19.79 ± 0.99 | 5.22 ± 0.17 | 26.36 ± 0.87 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.3 | 49.0 ± 2.1 | 38.0 ± 2.3 |
|
| 14 | 51 | 36.42 ± 1.02 | 9.71 ± 0.44 | 26.65 ± 1.20 | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 17.0 ± 1.2 | 53.0 ± 1.7 | 25.0 ± 1.1 | |
|
| 12 | 30 | 14.26 ± 0.53 | 2.98 ± 0.15 | 20.92 ± 1.05 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 7.0 ± 0.3 | 60.0 ± 3.7 | 30.0 ± 1.0 |
Duplication time, biomass and lipid productivity (mg L−1 day−1), percentage of lipids (percentage of dry weight), percentage of FFA, and percentage of TAG (percentage of total lipid extract) were used for PCA analysis. FFA, free fatty acid; GL, glycolipid; PL, phospholipid; TAG, triacylglycerol.
Figure 1PCA analysis for species distribution in two components statistical model. (A) Scores plot and (B) loadings plot with the parameters responsible for the clusterization. 1 Chaetoceros curvisetus; 2 Chaetoceros socialis; 3 Chaetoceros affinis; 4 Thalassiosira rotula 1647; 5 Thalassiosira rotula 3264; 6 Thalassiosira weissflogii P09; 7 Thalassiosira weissflogii 1010; 8 Thalassiosira weissflogii 1336; 9 Thalassiosira pseudonana; 10 Cyclotella cryptica; 11 Skeletonema marinoi 2092; 12 Skeletonema marinoi 2052; 13 Cylindrotheca fusiformis; 14 Phaeodactylum tricornutum; 15 Pseudo-nitzschia pseudodelicatissima; 16 Ditylum brightwelli; 17 Melosira octogona; 18 Nannochloropsis salina; 19 Dunaliella salina; 20 Dunaliella tertiolecta; 21 Chlamydomonas sp.
Figure 2Cultures of T. weissflogii P09 and C. cryptica CCMP 331 under two-stage nutrient regime. (A) Growth curves during the first (from day 0 to day 6) and second (from day 6 to day 11) stage of growth for Thalassiosira weissflogii . Gray lines indicate nutrient consumption under replete conditions; (B) growth curves during the first (from day 0 to day 8) and second (from day 8 to day 14) stage of growth for C. cryptica. Gray lines indicate nutrient consumption under replete conditions; (C) growth curve and nutrient consumption under depleted conditions (second stage of growth) for Thalassiosira weissflogii P09; (D) growth curve and nutrient consumption under depleted conditions (second stage of growth) for C. cryptica.
Figure 3Effect of nutrient depletion on biomass and lipid production in the centric diatoms T. weissoflogii (white) and C. cryptica (gray). t0 = starting point of limitation experiments; Rp = replete conditions; −N = nitrogen limitation (20% of standard concentration in f/2 medium); −Si = silicon limitation (20% of standard concentration in f/2 medium).
Figure 4Variation of (A) triacylglycerols (B) glycolipids and (C) phospholipids in T. weissflogii (white) and C. cryptica (gray). Rp = replete conditions; −N = nitrogen limitation; −Si = silicon limitation. *p < 0.05.