| Literature DB >> 23642220 |
Zhi-Kai Yang1, Ying-Fang Niu, Yu-Han Ma, Jiao Xue, Meng-Han Zhang, Wei-Dong Yang, Jie-Sheng Liu, Song-Hui Lu, Yuanfang Guan, Hong-Ye Li.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23642220 PMCID: PMC3662598 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-67
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Figure 1Growth of under standard and N-free conditions. Normal, cells grown under standard conditions, i.e. continuous culture in f/2-Si medium; Control, cells cultured in f/2-Si medium, with a transfer to fresh medium 5 days after subculture; -N, cells cultured in f/2-Si medium, with a transfer to fresh N-free medium 5 days after subculture.
Figure 2Relative fluorescence intensity of diatom cells under N deprivation. Triplicate samples of diatom cells were stained with Nile Red after 1 and 2 days of N deprivation, their fluorescence was measured and their relative fluorescence intensity was calculated by subtracting the autofluorescence of non-stained microalgae and Nile red. The left and right columns in each day reprensent the control and –N, respectively.
Fatty acid composition of following N deprivation
| C14:0 (myristic) | 5.31 | 0.22 | 6.27 | 0.12 |
| C16:0 (palmitic) | 15.89 | 0.66 | 25.87 | 0.49 |
| C18:0 (stearic) | 2.67 | 0.11 | 2.37 | 0.04 |
| Sum SFA | 23.87 | 0.99 | 34.51 | 0.65 |
| C16:1 (palmitoleic) | 23.91 | 0.99 | 42.55 | 0.80 |
| C18:1 (oleic) | 2.45 | 0.10 | NT | ND |
| Sum MUFA | 26.36 | 1.09 | 42.55 | 0.80 |
| C18:2 (linoleic) | NT | NT | 5.22 | 0.10 |
| C18:3 (linolenic) | 2.69 | 0.11 | 1.25 | 0.02 |
| C20:5 (eicosapentaenoic) | 20.33 | 0.84 | 11.67 | 0.22 |
| C22:6 (docosahexaenoic) | 1.07 | 0.04 | 0.64 | 0.01 |
| Sum PUFA | 24.09 | 1.00 | 18.78 | 0.35 |
| other FA | 10.88 | 0.45 | 2.71 | 0.05 |
| Total FA identified | 85.20 | 3.53 | 98.55 | 1.85 |
| Unsaturation ratios: | | | | |
| C 16 unsat./C16:0 | 1.50 | 0.06 | 1.64 | 0.03 |
| C18 unsat./C18.0 | 1.93 | 0.08 | 2.73 | 0.05 |
| Total unsat./total sat. | 2.11 | 0.09 | 1.78 | 0.03 |
| Lipid content (DW) | 24.13 | 53.33 | ||
Abbreviations: FA, Fatty acid; DW, Dry weight; SFA, Saturated fatty acid; MUFA, Monounsaturated fatty acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated fatty acid; ND, not detected.
Figure 3Representative confocal microscope images of the diatoms, showing oil bodies. Cells sampled during a 7-day culture cycle were stained with Nile Red and photographed under the confocal microscope daily. –N, cells subjected to the N deprivation treatment five days after subculture; Control, cells grown in f/2-Si medium and switched to fresh medium five days after subculture. Bar = 2 μm.
qPCR of differentially expressed genes following N deprivation
| agaatcggtgatgcctgttc | atgccgctgctttagtgaat | 103.3 | 5.80 | 0 | 0 | |
| acgattcggacgaagatcag | ccatgcaacaatcgtagtgg | 26.0 | 5.56 | 6.71E-14 | 1.99E-13 | |
| acaccaccgacaagaccttc | tccagacagagcgtacaacg | 116.6 | 5.46 | 0 | 0 | |
| gagcacttcgttctccaagg | gtccagaaagccacagcttc | −17.1 | −8.98 | 0 | 0 | |
| caggaactcgcgaagttagg | gcaagaatggaacccactgt | 3.35 | 7.42 | 2.46E-5 | 4.37E-5 | |
| aaggccacaatctcatggac | cttttgacggatggcaactt | 23.6 | 7.41 | 7.47E-9 | 1.63E-8 | |
| ctttacaacgccctgatcgt | ttgctgtcgtggaaagactg | −15.7 | −8.65 | 0 | 0 | |
| gcatattggaggctttggaa | tctgcatcatcatcccgata | 1.35 | −0.58 | 7.29E-3 | 0.010 | |
Each value corresponds to the mean of three biological sample performed in duplicates; β- actin is used as house-keeping gene in real-time quantitative PCR; significant changes are indicated by a p value<0.05 (Z-test).
Figure 4Proposed general transcriptional changes under N deprivation. Schematic diagram showing the putative localization of central metabolic pathways of P. tricornutum. Changes in the transcript abundance of associated genes are indicated with the following symbols representing fold changes: ++++ > 5; 5 > +++ > 3; 3 > ++ > 1; 1 > + > 0; 0 < − < −1; -1 < −−− < −3; -3 < −−− < −5; −−− < −5. The symbol denotes the overall changes of predicted isoenzymes. Some co-substrates or co-products of some reactions are omitted for clarity. The one “+” in the fatty acid synthesis in plastids denotes the overall transcriptional changes of the enzymes involved. Detailed fold changes are listed in Additional file 3 and Additional file 1. Enzymes were based on the genome annotation and prediction. Locus tags of some ambiguous isoenzymes are indicated. The localization of most of the enzymes are based on prediction and have not been determined experimentally.
Measurement of photosynthetic activity
Note: Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were monitored 48 h post N deprivation (−N). Date are shown as means ±SD; * and ** denote significant difference (p < 0.05) and extremely significant difference (p < 0.01), respectively.
Figure 5Effects of N deprivation on ultrastructure. Transmission electron micrographs showing subcellular structures of N-deprived (−N) and control P. tricornutum cells. OB, oil body; Chl, chloroplast; Pg, plastoglobule; boxed areas are magnified and showed to the right, demonstrating the dispersed thylakoid membranes under -N. Bar = 200 nm.
Figure 6Schematic diagram indicating effects of N deprivation on processes involved in TAG accumulation based on transcriptional changes. Square and elliptical boxes indicate up-regulation and down-regulation, respectively. “ѳ” indicates inhibition of the corresponding process.