Literature DB >> 25755793

Significance of preoperative calculation of uterine weight as an indicator for preserving the uterus in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Qingsong Sheng1, Ning Ma2, Huijuan Huang1, Bo Xu1, Chunni He1, Yanfeng Song1.   

Abstract

Recently, increasing evidence has shown that uterus preservation is beneficial for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) patients, both physiologically and psychologically. However, the preoperative indicators for uterus preservation have rarely been examined. The current study was designed to determine the relationship between the preoperative evaluated uterus weight and the operation selection (preserving the uterus or not) in pelvic reconstructive surgery (PRS) using vaginal meshes. First, in a series of 96 patients undergoing hysterectomy, the uterine weight was calculated by preoperative ultrasound measurements, and was then compared with the postoperative actual weight of the uterus. Subsequently, in a series of 65 patients undergone PRS using vaginal meshes and preserving the uterus, the uterine weight was calculated by preoperative ultrasound measurements. Lastly, in a series of 43 patients with a uterine weight > 56.12 g who had undergone PRS using vaginal meshes, the operation success rate in patients with a preserved uterus was compared to patients for whom the uterus was not preserved. The results showed that uterus weight can be evaluated by ultrasound and used as a preoperative indicator for whether the uterus should be preserved or not in PRS when using vaginal meshes. It was indicated that preoperative evaluation of uterine weight is beneficial for surgical planning and guidance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Uterine weight; pelvic organ prolapse; pelvic reconstructive surgery; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25755793      PMCID: PMC4348811     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol        ISSN: 1936-2625


  16 in total

Review 1.  Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review.

Authors:  Aparna Diwan; Charles R Rardin; Neeraj Kohli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

2.  Sexual function in women with pelvic organ prolapse compared to women without pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Joseph M Novi; Stacey Jeronis; Mark A Morgan; Lily A Arya
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Rising use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery: a review of the risk of vaginal erosion.

Authors:  Emanuela Mistrangelo; Sara Mancuso; Chiara Nadalini; Davide Lijoi; Sergio Costantini
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.137

4.  Ultrasound of the normal nongravid uterus: correlation with gross and histopathology.

Authors:  J F Platt; R L Bree; D Davidson
Journal:  J Clin Ultrasound       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 0.910

5.  Size and weight determinations of nongravid enlarged uteri.

Authors:  L Flickinger; G D'Ablaing; D R Mishell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?

Authors:  C F Maher; M P Cary; M C Slack; C J Murray; M Milligan; P Schluter
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  J Eric Jelovsek; Christopher Maher; Matthew D Barber
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-03-24       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Pre-operative ultrasonographic evaluation of nongravid, enlarged uteri--correlation with bimanual examination.

Authors:  A Dekel; J Farhi; T Levy; R Orvieto; Y Shalev; D Dicker; I Bar-Hava; Z Ben-Rafael
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.435

9.  Preoperative assessment by magnetic resonance imaging is useful for planning the treatment of an enlarged uterus by total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Authors:  Koji Hatta; Yoshito Terai; Kiyoji Okuda; Yoshihiro Nakamura; Saha Yoo; Yoshimichi Tanaka; Satoshi Tsunetoh; Atsushi Hayashi; Yoshiki Yamashita; Masahide Ohmichi
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 1.730

10.  Correlation of symptoms with degree of pelvic organ support in a general population of women: what is pelvic organ prolapse?

Authors:  Steven E Swift; Susan B Tate; Joyce Nicholas
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  2 in total

1.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Shveta Kapoor; Kanapathippillai Sivanesan; Jessica Amy Robertson; Mayooran Veerasingham; Vishal Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.