Literature DB >> 17848316

Rising use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic reconstructive surgery: a review of the risk of vaginal erosion.

Emanuela Mistrangelo1, Sara Mancuso, Chiara Nadalini, Davide Lijoi, Sergio Costantini.   

Abstract

Recently, the use of surgical mesh in pelvic floor surgery has become increasingly popular. While the reduction of surgical failure rates in vaginal reconstructive surgery is of critical importance, the addition of graft materials must be shown to improve anatomical outcomes and at least maintain, if not improve, lower urinary tract, bowel, and sexual function, as well as quality of life for the patient. Synthetic materials still have several disadvantages including vaginal erosion. Several factors contribute to the wide range of vaginal erosion rates, including patient characteristics such as age and estrogen deficiency; operative technique; implant size; and the specific properties of the graft material, such as pore size, stiffness, elasticity, and basic tissue compatibility. It is the aim of this article to present a critical review of the risk of vaginal erosion with use of synthetic grafts during vaginal reconstructive surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17848316     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2007.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  25 in total

1.  Significance of preoperative calculation of uterine weight as an indicator for preserving the uterus in pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Qingsong Sheng; Ning Ma; Huijuan Huang; Bo Xu; Chunni He; Yanfeng Song
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-01-01

2.  Clinical application of IUGA/ICS classification system for mesh erosion.

Authors:  Rebecca Posthuma Batalden; Milena M Weinstein; Caroline Foust-Wright; Marianna Alperin; May M Wakamatsu; Samantha J Pulliam
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 2.696

3.  Changing trends of surgical approaches for uterine prolapse: an 11-year population-based nationwide descriptive study.

Authors:  Ming-Ping Wu; Cheng-Yu Long; Kuan-Hui Huang; Chin-Chen Chu; Ching-Chung Liang; Chao-Hsiun Tang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Suburethral sling in autoimmune patients: complications, quality of life, and success rate.

Authors:  Roberto Angioli; Roberto Montera; Francesco Plotti; Corrado Terranova; Alessia Aloisi; Marzio Angelo Zullo
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  On the relevance of uniaxial tensile testing of urogynecological prostheses: the effect of displacement rate.

Authors:  Tony Bazi; Ali H Ammouri; Ramsey F Hamade
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Review of synthetic mesh-related complications in pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Abdulmalik Bako; Ruchika Dhar
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-09-09

7.  Mesh removal following transvaginal mesh placement: a case series of 104 operations.

Authors:  Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Risk factors for mesh erosion 3 months following vaginal reconstructive surgery using commercial kits vs. fashioned mesh-augmented vaginal repairs.

Authors:  Peter S Finamore; Karolynn T Echols; Krystal Hunter; Howard B Goldstein; Adam S Holzberg; Babak Vakili
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Vaginal degeneration following implantation of synthetic mesh with increased stiffness.

Authors:  R Liang; S Abramowitch; K Knight; S Palcsey; A Nolfi; A Feola; S Stein; P A Moalli
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.531

10.  Cystocele repair by transobturator four arms mesh: monocentric experience of first 123 patients.

Authors:  Cyril Eboue; Naama Marcus-Braun; Peter von Theobald
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.