Literature DB >> 25753144

Evaluation of the Microstat™ sublingual PCO2 monitor in ambulatory patients.

Benjamin D Fox1,2, Dominique Joyal3, Robert D Schlesinger4, Mark J Eisenberg5, David Langleben6.   

Abstract

Physicians often need to measure arterial PCO2 in clinical practice. Arterial blood gas sampling is typically available only in hospitals and may be unpleasant for patients. Minimally invasive techniques for measuring PCO2 offer the potential for overcoming these limitations. The MicroStat monitor non-invasively measures PCO2 in the sublingual tissues, which should track arterial PCO2 in hemodynamically stable patients. This was a prospective observational study. Patients undergoing routine cardiac catheterization were recruited. Following arterial cannulation, two sequential sublingual PCO2 measurements were taken and a contemporaneous arterial sample was sent for blood gas analysis. For each subject we calculated the mean sublingual-arterial CO2 gradient and the test-retest sublingual PCO2 difference. Twenty-five patients were studied. Mean sublingual-arterial PCO2 gradient was +6.8 mmHg (95 % limits of agreement -3.0 to 16.6 mmHg). Test-retest difference was 3.4 mmHg (95 % limits of agreement -1.1 to 7.9 mmHg), p = 0.11 (Wilcoxon test), repeatability was 11 mmHg. The MicroStat sublingual PCO2 monitor over-estimates arterial PCO2 with wide limits of agreement. Test-retest repeatability was poor. Use of sublingual PCO2 monitoring with the MicroStat monitor cannot currently replace blood gas sampling.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood gas analysis; Carbon dioxide; Comparative study; Patient monitoring; Sublingual region

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25753144     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-015-9686-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  7 in total

1.  Sublingual capnometry and indexes of tissue perfusion in patients with circulatory failure.

Authors:  E C Rackow; P O'Neil; M E Astiz; C M Carpati
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Arterial versus capillary blood gases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerald S Zavorsky; Jiguo Cao; Nancy E Mayo; Rina Gabbay; Juan M Murias
Journal:  Respir Physiol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-08-17       Impact factor: 1.931

3.  Measurement error.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

4.  Sublingual capnometry for rapid determination of the severity of hemorrhagic shock.

Authors:  Bonny J Baron; Richard P Dutton; Shahriar Zehtabchi; Jeanmarie Spanfelner; Karen L Stavile; Boris Khodorkovsky; Arun Nagdev; Barry Hahn; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2007-01

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Sublingual capnography: a clinical validation study.

Authors:  P E Marik
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  A meta-analysis on the utility of peripheral venous blood gas analyses in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the emergency department.

Authors:  Beng Leong Lim; Anne-Maree Kelly
Journal:  Eur J Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.799

  7 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 2016 end of year summary: respiration.

Authors:  D S Karbing; S E Rees; M B Jaffe
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Pressure Measurement after Prolonged Inspiratory Time Gives a Good Estimation of the Arterial Carbon Dioxide Pressure in Mechanically Ventilated Patients.

Authors:  Arthur Salomé; Annabelle Stoclin; Cyrus Motamed; Philippe Sitbon; Jean-Louis Bourgain
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.