Literature DB >> 11555530

Sublingual capnography: a clinical validation study.

P E Marik1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare sublingual PCO(2) (PslCO(2)) measurements with gastric intramucosal PCO(2) (PimCO(2)) as well as with the traditional indexes of tissue oxygenation in hemodynamically unstable ICU patients.
DESIGN: A prospective, validation study.
SETTING: The medical and coronary ICUs of a community teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with severe sepsis, septic shock, or cardiogenic shock requiring pulmonary artery catheterization for hemodynamic management.
INTERVENTIONS: During the first 24 h of ICU admission, the PslCO(2), PimCO(2), and blood lactate concentrations as well conventional hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters were recorded every 4 to 6 h. The PslCO(2)-PaCO(2) and PimCO(2)-PaCO(2) differences were used as indexes of tissue dysoxia. These variables were correlated with each other as well as with the traditional markers of tissue oxygenation.
RESULTS: Seventy-six data sets were obtained on 22 patients. Fifteen patients had severe sepsis/septic shock, and 7 patients did not have sepsis. A patient with ischemic bowel who had a large PimCO(2)-PslCO(2) difference (60.2 mm Hg) was excluded. The initial PslCO(2) and PimCO(2) measurements were 43.5 +/- 10.4 mm Hg and 42.8 +/- 10.9 mm Hg, respectively (correlation coefficient [r] of 0.86; p < 0.001). The mean PslCO(2) and PimCO(2) for the entire data set were 48.0 +/- 13.4 mm Hg and 46.1 +/- 12.3 mm Hg, respectively (r = 0.78; p < 0.001). Ten patients died. The initial PslCO(2)-PaCO(2) difference was 9.2 +/- 5.0 mm Hg in the survivors and 17.8 +/- 11.5 mm Hg in the nonsurvivors (p = 0.04). The initial PimCO(2)-PaCO(2) difference was 8.4 +/- 4.8 mm Hg in the survivors and 16.1 +/- 13.7 mm Hg in the nonsurvivors (p = 0.08, not significant). The initial PslCO(2)-PaCO(2) difference correlated with the initial mixed venous-arterial CO(2) gradient (r = 0.66; p = 0.001), but correlated poorly with the initial blood lactate concentration (r = 0.38), mixed venous PO(2) (r = 0.05), and systemic oxygen delivery (r = - 0.39).
CONCLUSION: In this study, sublingual capnometry yielded measurements that correlated well with those of gastric tonometry. PslCO(2) may serve as a technically simple and noninvasive clinical measurement of tissue dysoxia in critically ill and injured patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11555530     DOI: 10.1378/chest.120.3.923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  30 in total

Review 1.  Monitoring CO2 in shock states.

Authors:  Pierre-Eric Danin; Nils Siegenthaler; Jacques Levraut; Gilles Bernardin; Jean Dellamonica; Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Early and innovative interventions for severe sepsis and septic shock: taking advantage of a window of opportunity.

Authors:  Emanuel P Rivers; Lauralyn McIntyre; David C Morro; Kandis K Rivers
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Noninvasive monitoring of peripheral perfusion.

Authors:  Alexandre Lima; Jan Bakker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Methods of monitoring shock.

Authors:  Ednan K Bajwa; Atul Malhotra; B Taylor Thompson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.119

5.  A system of classification for the clinical applications of capnography.

Authors:  Naveen Eipe; Jordan Tarshis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Monitoring the microcirculation.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Katia Donadello; Diego Orbegozo Cortes
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Evaluation of the Microstat™ sublingual PCO2 monitor in ambulatory patients.

Authors:  Benjamin D Fox; Dominique Joyal; Robert D Schlesinger; Mark J Eisenberg; David Langleben
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 8.  Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Diamantino Salgado; Raphaël Favory; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006.

Authors:  Massimo Antonelli; Mitchell Levy; Peter J D Andrews; Jean Chastre; Leonard D Hudson; Constantine Manthous; G Umberto Meduri; Rui P Moreno; Christian Putensen; Thomas Stewart; Antoni Torres
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  The microcirculation as a diagnostic and therapeutic target in sepsis.

Authors:  Andrea Nencioni; Stephen Trzeciak; Nathan I Shapiro
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 3.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.