Literature DB >> 25752219

The Impact of a Tiered Network on Hospital Choice.

Matthew B Frank1, John Hsu2, Mary Beth Landrum3, Michael E Chernew3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a tiered network on hospital choice for scheduled admissions. DATA: The 2009-2012 patient-level claims data from Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA). STUDY
DESIGN: BCBSMA's three-tiered hospital network employs large differential cost sharing to encourage patients to seek care at hospitals on the preferred tier. During the study period, 44 percent of hospitals were moved to a different tier based on changes in cost or quality performance. We relied on this longitudinal variation for identification and specified conditional logit models to estimate the effect of the tiered network (TN) on patients' hospital choices relative to a non-TN comparison group. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: The TN was associated with increased use of hospitals on the preferred and middle tiers relative to the nonpreferred tier for planned admissions. The results suggest that if all members were in a TN plan, relative to all members being in a non-TN plan, scheduled admissions to hospitals on the nonpreferred tier would drop by 7.6 percentage points, while those to middle and preferred tier hospitals would rise by 0.9 and 6.6 percentage points, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Differential cost sharing can steer patients toward preferred hospitals for planned admissions. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Tiered network; cost sharing; hospital choice

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25752219      PMCID: PMC4600365          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  39 in total

1.  Reducing patient drug acquisition costs can lower diabetes health claims.

Authors:  John J Mahoney
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Effects of a cost-sharing exemption on use of preventive services at one large employer.

Authors:  Susan H Busch; Colleen L Barry; Sally J Vegso; Jody L Sindelar; Mark R Cullen
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  High-performance health plan networks: early experiences.

Authors:  Debra A Draper; Allison Liebhaber; Paul B Ginsburg
Journal:  Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change       Date:  2007-05

4.  Use of medical care in the Rand Health Insurance Experiment. Diagnosis- and service-specific analyses in a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K N Lohr; R H Brook; C J Kamberg; G A Goldberg; A Leibowitz; J Keesey; D Reboussin; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Spatial patterns of hospital utilization: the impact of distance and time.

Authors:  M A McGuirk; F W Porell
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Cost sharing and the use of ambulatory mental health services.

Authors:  W G Manning; K B Wells; N Duan; J P Newhouse; J E Ware
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1984-10

7.  Emergency department use and subsequent hospitalizations among members of a high-deductible health plan.

Authors:  J Frank Wharam; Bruce E Landon; Alison A Galbraith; Ken P Kleinman; Stephen B Soumerai; Dennis Ross-Degnan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  How free care reduced hypertension in the health insurance experiment.

Authors:  E B Keeler; R H Brook; G A Goldberg; C J Kamberg; J P Newhouse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-10-11       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Medicare coverage, supplemental insurance, and the use of mammography by older women.

Authors:  J Blustein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Insurance type and choice of hospital for coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  M Chernew; D Scanlon; R Hayward
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  3 in total

1.  Pharmacy switching in response to preferred pharmacy networks in Medicare Part D.

Authors:  Jianhui Xu; Erin Trish; Geoffrey Joyce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.734

2.  The moral hazard effects of consumer responses to targeted cost-sharing.

Authors:  Christopher M Whaley; Chaoran Guo; Timothy T Brown
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Using the deductible for patient channeling: did preferred providers gain patient volume?

Authors:  Stéphanie A van der Geest; Marco Varkevisser
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-08-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.