Literature DB >> 17356030

Emergency department use and subsequent hospitalizations among members of a high-deductible health plan.

J Frank Wharam1, Bruce E Landon, Alison A Galbraith, Ken P Kleinman, Stephen B Soumerai, Dennis Ross-Degnan.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Patients evaluated at emergency departments often present with nonemergency conditions that can be treated in other clinical settings. High-deductible health plans have been promoted as a means of reducing overutilization but could also be related to worse outcomes if patients defer necessary care.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the relationship between transition to a high-deductible health plan and emergency department use for low- and high-severity conditions and to examine changes in subsequent hospitalizations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of emergency department visits and subsequent hospitalizations among 8724 individuals for 1 year before and after their employers mandated a switch from a traditional health maintenance organization plan to a high-deductible health plan, compared with 59 557 contemporaneous controls who remained in the traditional plan. All persons were aged 1 to 64 years and insured by a Massachusetts health plan between March 1, 2001, and June 30, 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of first and repeat emergency department visits classified as low, indeterminate, or high severity during the baseline and follow-up periods, as well as rates of inpatient admission after emergency department visits.
RESULTS: Between the baseline and follow-up periods, emergency department visits among members who switched to high-deductible coverage decreased from 197.5 to 178.1 per 1000 members, while visits among controls remained at approximately 220 per 1000 (-10.0% adjusted difference in difference; 95% confidence interval [CI], -16.6% to -2.8%; P = .007). The high-deductible plan was not associated with a change in the rate of first visits occurring during the study period (-4.1% adjusted difference in difference; 95% CI, -11.8% to 4.3%). Repeat visits in the high-deductible group decreased from 334.6 to 255.3 visits per 1000 members and increased from 321.1 to 334.4 per 1000 members in controls (-24.9% difference in difference; 95% CI, -37.5% to -9.7%; P = .002). Low-severity repeat emergency department visits decreased in the high-deductible group from 142.5 to 92.1 per 1000 members and increased in controls from 128.0 to 132.5 visits per 1000 members (-36.4% adjusted difference in difference; 95% CI, -51.1% to -17.2%; P<.001), whereas a small decrease in high-severity visits in the high-deductible group could not be excluded. The percentage of patients admitted from the emergency department in the high-deductible group decreased from 11.8 % to 10.9% and increased from 11.9% to 13.6% among controls (-24.7% adjusted difference in difference; 95% CI, -41.0% to -3.9%; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Traditional health plan members who switched to high-deductible coverage visited the emergency department less frequently than controls, with reductions occurring primarily in repeat visits for conditions that were not classified as high severity, and had decreases in the rate of hospitalizations from the emergency department. Further research is needed to determine long-term health care utilization patterns under high-deductible coverage and to assess risks and benefits related to clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17356030     DOI: 10.1001/jama.297.10.1093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  55 in total

1.  Who pays? Cost-sharing, tradeoffs, and the physicians' role in decision making.

Authors:  Anders Chen; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Health savings accounts and health care spending.

Authors:  Anthony T Lo Sasso; Mona Shah; Bianca K Frogner
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  The influence of targeted education on medication persistence and generic substitution among consumer-directed health care enrollees.

Authors:  Rebecca L Sedjo; Emily R Cox
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Emergency department use by the uninsured after health care reform in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Peter Smulowitz; Bruce E Landon; Laura Burke; Christopher Baugh; Heather Gunn; Robert Lipton
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 5.  Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sofie Rahman Morgan; Anna Marie Chang; Mahfood Alqatari; Jesse M Pines
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Comparison of incidence of hospital utilization for poisoning and other injury types.

Authors:  Henry A Spiller; Michael D Singleton
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Impact of a high-deductible health plan on outpatient visits and associated diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Sheila R Reddy; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Alan M Zaslavsky; Stephen B Soumerai; James F Wharam
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Overuse and insurance plan type in a privately insured population.

Authors:  Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Nancy E Morden; Thomas D Sequist; Alexander J Mainor; Zhonghe Li; Kevin H Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Out-of-pocket prices of opioid analgesics in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Scott A Strassels
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.750

10.  High-Deductible Insurance and Delay in Care for the Macrovascular Complications of Diabetes.

Authors:  J Frank Wharam; Christine Y Lu; Fang Zhang; Matthew Callahan; Xin Xu; Jamie Wallace; Stephen Soumerai; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Joseph P Newhouse
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.