Literature DB >> 4046121

How free care reduced hypertension in the health insurance experiment.

E B Keeler, R H Brook, G A Goldberg, C J Kamberg, J P Newhouse.   

Abstract

In a controlled trial of the effects of medical insurance on spending and health status, we previously reported lower average (0.8 mm Hg) diastolic blood pressures with free care than with cost-sharing plans. We show herein that for clinically defined hypertensives, blood pressures with free care were significantly lower (1.9 mm Hg) than with cost-sharing plans, with a larger difference for low-income hypertensives than for high-income hypertensives (3.5 vs 1.1 mm Hg), but similar differences for blacks and whites. The cause of the difference was the additional contact with physicians under free care; this led to better detection and treatment of hypertensives not under care at the start of the study. Free care also led to higher compliance by hypertensives with diet and smoking recommendations and higher use of medication by those who needed it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4046121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  38 in total

Review 1.  A framework for cost-sharing policy analysis.

Authors:  R J Rubin; D N Mendelson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Commentary: assessing the health effects of Medicare coverage for previously uninsured adults: a matter of life and death?

Authors:  J Michael McWilliams; Ellen Meara; Alan M Zaslavsky; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Cost-sharing for emergency care and unfavorable clinical events: findings from the safety and financial ramifications of ED copayments study.

Authors:  John Hsu; Mary Price; Richard Brand; G Thomas Ray; Bruce Fireman; Joseph P Newhouse; Joseph V Selby
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  The treatment of hypertension: new lamps for old?

Authors:  J R Hampton
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.727

Review 5.  What do you do when the blood pressure is up? An approach to the known hypertensive who has an elevated blood pressure.

Authors:  R L Schiff; M H Cohen; A Balson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Health insurance and cardiovascular disease risk factors.

Authors:  Erica L Brooks; Sarah Rosner Preis; Shih-Jen Hwang; Joanne M Murabito; Emelia J Benjamin; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Paul Sorlie; Daniel Levy
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Value-Based Insurance Design: Aligning Incentives to Improve Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Eric C Stecker; John Z Ayanian; A Mark Fendrick
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  How free care improved vision in the health insurance experiment.

Authors:  N Lurie; C J Kamberg; R H Brook; E B Keeler; J P Newhouse
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  The impact of universal National Health Insurance on population health: the experience of Taiwan.

Authors:  Yue-Chune Lee; Yu-Tung Huang; Yi-Wen Tsai; Shiuh-Ming Huang; Ken N Kuo; Martin McKee; Ellen Nolte
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Financial cost as an obstacle to hypertension therapy.

Authors:  N B Shulman; B Martinez; D Brogan; A A Carr; C G Miles
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.