Literature DB >> 23194208

An analysis of the readability of patient information and consent forms used in research studies in anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand.

H E Taylor1, D E P Bramley.   

Abstract

The provision of written information is a component of the informed consent process for research participants. We conducted a readability analysis to test the hypothesis that the language used in patient information and consent forms in anaesthesia research in Australia and New Zealand does not meet the readability standards or expectations of the Good Clinical Practice Guidelines, the National Health and Medical Research Council in Australia and the Health Research Council of New Zealand. We calculated readability scores for 40 patient information and consent forms using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook and Flesch-Kincaid formulas. The mean grade level of patient information and consent forms when using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook and Flesch-Kincaid readability formulas was 12.9 (standard deviation of 0.8, 95% confidence interval 12.6 to 13.1) and 11.9 (standard deviation 1.1, 95% confidence interval 11.6 to 12.3), respectively. This exceeds the average literacy and comprehension of the general population in Australia and New Zealand. Complex language decreases readability and negatively impacts on the informed consent process. Care should be exercised when providing written information to research participants to ensure language and readability is appropriate for the audience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23194208     DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1204000610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesth Intensive Care        ISSN: 0310-057X            Impact factor:   1.669


  10 in total

1.  The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository Development.

Authors:  Blake J Roessler; Nicholas H Steneck; Lisa Connally
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.

Authors:  Rebekah E McWhirter; Lisa Eckstein
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: feasibility, approach, and results.

Authors:  Nancy E Kass; Holly A Taylor; Joseph Ali; Kristina Hallez; Lelia Chaisson
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.486

4.  Use of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict the Understandability of Health Education Materials: Development and Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Meng Ji; Yanmeng Liu; Mengdan Zhao; Ziqing Lyu; Boren Zhang; Xin Luo; Yanlin Li; Yin Zhong
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-05-06

Review 5.  Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how.

Authors:  José A Sacristán; Alfonso Aguarón; Cristina Avendaño-Solá; Pilar Garrido; Juan Carrión; Alipio Gutiérrez; Robert Kroes; Angeles Flores
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality.

Authors:  Stephanie Robins; Helena J Barr; Rachel Idelson; Sylvie Lambert; Phyllis Zelkowitz
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2016-10-21

7.  Nocebo effects and participant information leaflets: evaluating information provided on adverse effects in UK clinical trials.

Authors:  Nigel Kirby; Victoria Shepherd; Jeremey Howick; Sophie Betteridge; Kerenza Hood
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Creating concise and readable patient information sheets for interventional studies in Australia: are we there yet?

Authors:  Tanya Symons; Joshua S Davis
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 2.728

9.  Sense and readability: participant information sheets for research studies.

Authors:  Liam Ennis; Til Wykes
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.319

10.  Readability of patient information and consent documents in rheumatological studies.

Authors:  Bente Hamnes; Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings; Jette Primdahl
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.652

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.