Literature DB >> 21672893

Biobankonomics: a taxonomy for evaluating the economic benefits of standardized centralized human biobanking for translational research.

Joyce Rogers1, Todd Carolin, Jimmie Vaught, Carolyn Compton.   

Abstract

Investments in medical research and development enable the scientific progress that influences our society's body of knowledge about disease, the quality of health care, and our quality of life. Critical components of these investments include the technological and human capital factors rooted in human specimen biobanking, which can be considered foundational to driving post genomic scientific and medical research. Their importance to cancer research, information-based medicine, and quality of health care are becoming increasingly recognized by pharmaceutical companies, non profit foundations, academic researchers, and government research agencies. However, the failure to standardize tissue collection, handling, processing, and preservation so that data can be directly compared between specimen sets, as well as insufficient leveraging of the highest quality tissue samples and associated data across an array of research needs, have strained economies of scale for the biobanking field. Although existing biobanks for private research contribute economic benefits to stakeholders that can be easily substantiated, little has been published to demonstrate the positive outcomes generated from the use, application, and dissemination of their resources more broadly. Through the use of analogous examples, this article presents a rationale for how standardization and consolidation of biobanking resources would contribute to the realization of budget savings, cost avoidances, process efficiencies, and other financial impacts to both the research community and the public. A number of areas are examined, including laboratory analysis efficiencies, data modeling accuracy, infrastructure cost savings, reduced clinical trials evaluation costs, improvements in patient diagnosis, and the potential impact on industry professionalization and job creation. Areas for further study are also outlined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21672893     DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgr010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr        ISSN: 1052-6773


  9 in total

1.  The Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT): Online Financial Planning to Facilitate Biobank Sustainability.

Authors:  Hana Odeh; Lisa Miranda; Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Howard Greenman; Jeffrey McLean; Daniel Reed; Sarfraz Memon; Benjamin Fombonne; Ping Guan; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  The promise of organ and tissue preservation to transform medicine.

Authors:  Sebastian Giwa; Jedediah K Lewis; Luis Alvarez; Robert Langer; Alvin E Roth; George M Church; James F Markmann; David H Sachs; Anil Chandraker; Jason A Wertheim; Martine Rothblatt; Edward S Boyden; Elling Eidbo; W P Andrew Lee; Bohdan Pomahac; Gerald Brandacher; David M Weinstock; Gloria Elliott; David Nelson; Jason P Acker; Korkut Uygun; Boris Schmalz; Brad P Weegman; Alessandro Tocchio; Greg M Fahy; Kenneth B Storey; Boris Rubinsky; John Bischof; Janet A W Elliott; Teresa K Woodruff; G John Morris; Utkan Demirci; Kelvin G M Brockbank; Erik J Woods; Robert N Ben; John G Baust; Dayong Gao; Barry Fuller; Yoed Rabin; David C Kravitz; Michael J Taylor; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Critical Financial Challenges for Biobanking: Report of a National Cancer Institute Study.

Authors:  Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Bill Tulskie; Dorie Olson; Hana Odeh; Jeffrey McLean; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.300

4.  Fee-for-service as a business model of growing importance: the academic biobank experience.

Authors:  Sandra A McDonald; Kara Sommerkamp; Maureen Egan-Palmer; Karen Kharasch; Victoria Holtschlag
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  The MICHR Genomic DNA BioLibrary: An Empirical Study of the Ethics of Biorepository Development.

Authors:  Blake J Roessler; Nicholas H Steneck; Lisa Connally
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 1.742

Review 6.  The evolution of biobanking best practices.

Authors:  Jim Vaught; Nicole C Lockhart
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 7.  Impacts of a biobank: Bridging the gap in translational cancer medicine.

Authors:  Tushar Vora; Nirav Thacker
Journal:  Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

8.  Biobankers: Treat the Poison of Invisibility with CoBRA, a Systematic Way of Citing Bioresources in Journal Articles.

Authors:  Federica Napolitani; Alessia Calzolari; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Laurence Mabile; Anna Maria Rossi; Paola De Castro; Elena Bravo
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Biobanking-Budgets and the Role of Pathology Biobanks in Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Chris Andry; Elizabeth Duffy; Christopher A Moskaluk; Shannon McCall; Michael H A Roehrl; Daniel Remick
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2017-05-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.