| Literature DB >> 25742617 |
Patrícia S Costa1, Mariana P Reis1, Marcelo P Ávila1, Laura R Leite2, Flávio M G de Araújo2, Anna C M Salim2, Guilherme Oliveira2, Francisco Barbosa1, Edmar Chartone-Souza1, Andréa M A Nascimento1.
Abstract
Here, we describe the metagenome and functional composition of a microbial community in a historically metal-contaminated tropical freshwater stream sediment. The sediment was collected from the Mina Stream located in the Iron Quadrangle (Brazil), one of the world's largest mining regions. Environmental DNA was extracted and was sequenced using SOLiD technology, and a total of 7.9 Gbp was produced. A taxonomic profile that was obtained by comparison to the Greengenes database revealed a complex microbial community with a dominance of Proteobacteria and Parvarcheota. Contigs were recruited by bacterial and archaeal genomes, especially Candidatus Nitrospira defluvii and Nitrosopumilus maritimus, and their presence implicated them in the process of N cycling in the Mina Stream sediment (MSS). Functional reconstruction revealed a large, diverse set of genes for ammonium assimilation and ammonification. These processes have been implicated in the maintenance of the N cycle and the health of the sediment. SEED subsystems functional annotation unveiled a high degree of diversity of metal resistance genes, suggesting that the prokaryotic community is adapted to metal contamination. Furthermore, a high metabolic diversity was detected in the MSS, suggesting that the historical arsenic contamination is no longer affecting the prokaryotic community. These results expand the current knowledge of the microbial taxonomic and functional composition of tropical metal-contaminated freshwater sediments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25742617 PMCID: PMC4351183 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119465
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Bacterial and archaeal phyla abundance.
Taxonomic composition of bacterial (A) and archaeal (B) taxa from MSS microbiota based on the Greengenes database. Other bacteria: Gemmatimonadetes, Cyanobacteria, OP3, OP11, Spirochaetes, TM7, Chlorobi, WS3, Elusimicrobia, GN04, TM6, GN02, Tenericutes, Armatimonadetes, BRC1, NC10, WPS-2, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, H-178, FCPU426, Kazan-3B-28, WS5, NKB19, Thermi, AC1, TPD-58, WS6, Synergistetes, OP8, WS2, ZB3, SC4, OP1, SBR1093, SR1, Lentisphaerae, GAL15, PAUC34f, LCP-89 and MVS-104.
Fig 2Fragment recruitment plots of the MSS contigs.
Candidatus Nitrospira defluvi (A and B—FP929003.1) and Nitrosopumilus maritimus (C and D—CP000866.1). The comparison was made using BLASTn. Vertical axis showed the % identity of the metagenomic contigs to the respective bacterial or archaeal genome. A and C—recruitment by R software; B and D—recruitment by MG-RAST.
Fig 3SEED subsystems distribution of the MSS metagenome based on MG-RAST annotation.
The cutoff parameters were e-value 1x10-5 and 60% of identity.
The most frequent nitrogen metabolism and metal resistance proteins in the MSS metagenome obtained using the MG-RAST web server based on SEED database.
| Protein | Number of contigs | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Allantoin Utilization | 2-hydroxy-3-oxopropionate reductase (EC 1.1.1.60) | 43 |
| Allantoate amidohydrolase (EC 3.5.3.9) | 50 | |
| Ureidoglycolate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.154) | 53 | |
| Ammonia assimilation | Ammonium transporter | 64 |
| Ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase (EC 1.4.7.1) | 525 | |
| Glutamate synthase [NADH] (EC 1.4.1.14) | 43 | |
| Glutamate synthase [NADPH] large and small chain (EC 1.4.1.13) | 123 | |
| Glutamate-ammonia-ligase adenylyltransferase—GlnE (EC 2.7.7.42) | 44 | |
| Glutamine synthetase type I and type III (EC 6.3.1.2) | 130 | |
| Cyanate hydrolysis | Carbonic anhydrase—CynT (EC 4.2.1.1) | 44 |
| Nitrate and nitrite ammonification | Assimilatory nitrate reductase large subunit (EC:1.7.99.4) | 77 |
| Nitrite reductase [NAD(P)H] small subunit (EC 1.7.1.4) | 30 | |
| Nitrite reductase probable electron transfer 4Fe-S subunit (EC 1.7.1.4) | 210 | |
| NrfC protein | 51 | |
| Polyferredoxin NapH (periplasmic nitrate reductase) | 59 | |
| Putative thiol:disulfide oxidoreductase, nitrite reductase complex assembly | 76 | |
| Respiratory nitrate reductase delta chain (EC 1.7.99.4) | 42 | |
| Respiratory nitrate reductase subunit, conjectural (EC 1.7.99.4) | 78 | |
| Nitric oxide synthase | Manganese superoxide dismutase (EC 1.15.1.1) | 42 |
| Nitrogen fixation | AnfO protein, required for Mo- and V-independent nitrogenase | 51 |
| Nitrogenase (vanadium-iron) beta chain (EC 1.18.6.1) | 47 | |
|
| ||
| Arsenic resistance | Arsenic resistance operon (ArsB, ArsH, ArsA, ArsR, ArsD) | 67 |
| Arsenical-resistance protein ACR3 | 112 | |
| Respiratory arsenate reductase, Mo binding subunit and FeS subunit (ArrA and ArrB) | 124 | |
| Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance | Cadmium-transporting ATPase—CRA (EC 3.6.3.3) | 24 |
| Probable cadmium-transporting ATPase—PCT (EC 3.6.3.3) | 20 | |
| Cation efflux system protein (CusA,CusR, CusC, CusB) | 990 | |
| Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance protein (CzcA, CzcD, CzcB, CzrR, CzrB) | 2007 | |
| Probable Co/Zn/Cd efflux system membrane fusion protein (CusB/CzsB) | 160 | |
| Putative silver efflux pump | 45 | |
| Copper homeostasis | Copper-translocating P-type ATPase (EC 3.6.3.4) | 504 |
| Cytochrome c heme lyase subunit CcmF | 31 | |
| Multicopper oxidase | 187 | |
| Mercuric reductase | FAD-dependent NAD(P)-disulphide oxidoreductase | 85 |
| Mercury resistance operon | Mercuric resistance proteins (MerC, MerE, MerT, MerD, MerR, MerP, MerA) | 200 |
| Resistance to chromium compounds | Chromate resistance proteins (ChrI, ChrA, ChrC) | 17 |
| Zinc resistance | Response regulator of zinc sigma-54-dependent two-component system (ZraR) | 72 |
Fig 4Significant SEED subsystem differences as a result of a Fisher exact test between the MSS and RAW metagenomes conducted with the STAMP program.
Enrichment of SEED subsystem in the RAW metagenome has a positive difference between proportions (blue circles), whereas enrichment of SEED subsystem in the MSS metagenome has a negative difference between proportions (orange circles). Bars on the left represent the proportion of each subsystem in the data. Subsystems difference with a p value of >0.05 were considered to be significant.
Fig 5Significant metal resistance genes differences as a result of a Fisher exact test between the MSS and RAW metagenomes conducted with the STAMP program.
Enrichment of metal resistance genes in the RAW metagenome has a positive difference between proportions (blue circles), whereas enrichment of metal resistance genes in the MSS metagenome has a negative difference between proportions (orange circles). Barson the left represent the proportion of each metal resistance protein in the data. Metal resistance difference with a p value of >0.05 were considered to be significant.
Fig 6Average well-color development (AWCD) calculated from the consumption of carbon sources of anaerobic and aerobic microbial communities.