| Literature DB >> 25741330 |
Anthony S Amend1, Kristin L Matulich2, Jennifer B H Martiny2.
Abstract
Fungi play a critical role in the degradation of organic matter. Because different combinations of fungi result in different rates of decomposition, determining how climate change will affect microbial composition and function is fundamental to predicting future environments. Fungal response to global change is patterned by genetic relatedness, resulting in communities with comparatively low phylogenetic diversity (PD). This may have important implications for the functional capacity of disturbed communities if lineages sensitive to disturbance also contain unique traits important for litter decomposition. Here we tested the relationship between PD and decomposition rates. Leaf litter fungi were isolated from the field and deployed in microcosms as mock communities along a gradient of initial PD, while species richness was held constant. Replicate communities were subject to nitrogen fertilization comparable to anthropogenic deposition levels. Carbon mineralization rates were measured over the course of 66 days. We found that nitrogen fertilization increased cumulative respiration by 24.8%, and that differences in respiration between fertilized and ambient communities diminished over the course of the experiment. Initial PD failed to predict respiration rates or their change in response to nitrogen fertilization, and there was no correlation between community similarity and respiration rates. Last, we detected no phylogenetic signal in the contributions of individual isolates to respiration rates. Our results suggest that the degree to which PD predicts ecosystem function will depend on environmental context.Entities:
Keywords: climate change; ecosystem function; fungi; leaf litter decomposition; microcosm; nitrogen fertilization; phylogenetic diversity
Year: 2015 PMID: 25741330 PMCID: PMC4332350 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00109
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Results of the ANCOVA Model testing the effects of phylogenetic diversity (PD), nitrogen addition and sampling time on respiration (top), and on the affects of nitrogen addition on community respiration (cumulative difference; below).
| Variable | Factor | Df | Sum squares | Mean squares | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Respiration | PD | 1 | 89969 | 89969 | 0.029 | 0.866 |
| Residuals | 48 | 150170078 | 3128543 | |||
| Nitrogen | 1 | 5.76E + 07 | 57603071 | 99.018 | ||
| Time | 10 | 1.53E + 09 | 153271897 | 263.469 | ||
| PD:nitrogen | 1 | 1.14E + 05 | 114248 | 0.196 | 0.658 | |
| PD:time | 10 | 3.01E+ 06 | 300580 | 0.517 | 0.879 | |
| Nitrogen:time | 10 | 7.71E + 07 | 7707967 | 13.25 | ||
| PD:nitrogen:time | 10 | 1.43E + 06 | 142590 | 0.245 | 0.991 | |
| Residuals | 1008 | 5.86E + 08 | 581745 | |||
| Cumulative difference | PD | 1 | 0.37 | 0.369 | 0.071 | 0.791 |
| Residuals | 48 | 248.77 | 5.183 | |||
| Time | 10 | 1.00E-27 | 1.00E-28 | 1.864 | ||
| PD:time | 10 | 1.04E-28 | 1.04E-29 | 0.193 | 0.997 | |
| Residuals | 480 | 2.58E-26 | 5.37E-29 |
Results from the multiple regression analyses of species effects on decomposition, from left to right: all microcosms combined, ambient, nitrogen fertilized, and the effect size of fertilization.
| Species | Combined | Ambient | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.603 | 0.073 | 0.778 | 0.699 | |
| -1.136 | - | -0.065 | ||
| -0.019 | 0.855 | -0.558 | -1.592 | |
| 1.08 | 1.687 | 0.426 | -0.757 | |
| -1.109 | -1.414 | -0.635 | 0.315 | |
| 0.908 | 0.972 | 0.636 | -0.161 | |
| 0.115 | 0.482 | -0.143 | -0.835 | |
| 0.215 | 0.166 | 0.191 | 0.026 | |
| -1.57 | - | 0.065 | ||
| 0.601 | 1.136 | 0.114 | -1.398 | |
| -1.413 | -1.66 | -0.898 | 0.331 | |
| -0.39 | -0.656 | -0.125 | 0.438 | |
| 1.459 | 1.814 | 0.865 | -0.995 | |
| Helotiales_sp. | 1.008 | 0.835 | 0.857 | 0.527 |
| -0.766 | -1.723 | 0.026 | 0.687 | |
| -0.088 | 0.418 | -0.381 | -0.04 | |
| -0.33 | -0.582 | -0.089 | -0.302 | |
| Helotiales_sp | -0.898 | -1.481 | -0.305 | 0.325 |
| 0.421 | 0.158 | 0.477 | 0.236 | |
| Dothideomycetes_sp | -0.884 | -0.138 | -1.122 | -1.112 |
| 0.961 | -1.434 | |||
| Sordariomycete_sp.1 | -0.631 | -1.166 | -0.136 | 1.016 |
| Sordariomycetes_sp.2 | -0.95 | -0.597 | -0.926 | -0.914 |
| Sordariomycetes_sp.3 | 1.75 | 1.465 | 1.48 | -0.38 |
| 0.207 | -0.639 | 0.681 | 1.254 | |
| -1.566 | - | -0.577 | ||
| 0.214 | 0.069 | 0.25 | 0.509 | |
| -0.115 | 0.26 | -0.318 | -0.689 | |
| -0.002 | 0.724 | -0.453 | -1.262 | |
| 1.248 | 0.649 | 1.301 | 0.468 | |
| Aureobasidium_sp. | -0.062 | 0.257 | -0.244 | -0.411 |
| 0.444 | 0.56 | 0.259 | -0.159 | |
| -0.662 | -0.807 | -0.402 | -0.414 | |
| 0.988 | 0.375 | 1.117 | 0.876 | |
| -0.088 | 0.005 | -0.123 | -0.229 | |
| -0.43 | -0.619 | -0.202 | 0.327 | |
| Pleosporales_2 | 0.746 | 0.937 | 0.436 | -0.084 |
| Pleosporales_1 | -0.009 | 0.646 | -0.414 | -0.634 |
| -0.007 | 0.506 | -0.325 | -0.778 | |
| -0.262 | -1.211 | 0.395 | 1.173 | |
| -0.736 | -1.609 | -0.004 | 0.725 | |
| 1.846 | 1.581 | -0.011 | ||
| 0.00061 | 0.00003 | 0.00025 | 0.00001 |
Relative abundance of isolates and isolate families in a field survey of leaf litter fungi.
| Isolate name | Family (unless otherwise noted) | Phylum | Taxon relative abundance in survey | Family relative abundance in survey |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ascomycota_incertae_sedis (phylum) | Ascomycetes | – | N.D. | |
| Botryosphaeriaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 0.191 | |
| Davidiellaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 39.027 | |
| Dothideaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 0.634 | |
| Dothideomycetes | Dothideomycetes (class) | Ascomycetes | – | – |
| Dothioraceae | Ascomycetes | – | 0.863 | |
| Helotiales sp. | Helotiales (rank) | Ascomycetes | – | – |
| Helotiales sp. | Helotiales (rank) | Ascomycetes | – | – |
| Helotiales_incertae_sedis (rank) | Ascomycetes | – | N.D. | |
| Herpotrichiellaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 0.026 | |
| Herpotrichiellaceae | Ascomycetes | 0.008 | 0.026 | |
| Herpotrichiellaceae | Ascomycetes | 0.000 | 0.026 | |
| Hypocreaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 0.000 | |
| Hypocreales sp. | Hypocreaceae | Ascomycetes | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Hypocreales_incertae_sedis (rank) | Ascomycetes | – | N.D. | |
| Lasiosphaeriaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 0.451 | |
| Nectriaceae | Ascomycetes | 0.029 | 0.102 | |
| Phaeosphaeriaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 6.770 | |
| Pleosporaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 37.611 | |
| Pleosporaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 37.611 | |
| Pleosporaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 37.611 | |
| Pleosporaceae | Ascomycetes | – | 37.611 | |
| Pleosporales sp. 1 | Pleosporales (rank) | Ascomycetes | – | – |
| Pleosporales sp. 2 | Pleosporales (rank) | Ascomycetes | – | – |
| Pleosporales_incertae_sedis (rank) | Ascomycetes | 0.003 | N.D. | |
| Sordariomycetes sp. 1 | Sordariomycetes (class) | Ascomycetes | 0.190 | – |
| Sordariomycetes sp. 2 | Sordariomycetes (class) | Ascomycetes | Singleton | – |
| Sordariomycetes sp. 3 | Sordariomycetes (class) | Ascomycetes | – | – |
| Trichocomaceae | Ascomycetes | Singleton | 0.027 | |
| Sporidiales incertae sedis (rank) | Basidiomycetes | N.D. | ||
| Erythrobasidiaceae | Basidiomycetes | – | N.D. | |
| Erythrobasidiaceae | Basidiomycetes | <0.001 | N.D. | |
| Erythrobasidiaceae | Basidiomycetes | – | N.D. | |
| Erythrobasidiaceae | Basidiomycetes | 0.017 | N.D. | |
| Tremellaceae | Basidiomycetes | – | 3.124 | |
| Tremellaceae | Basidiomycetes | – | 3.124 | |
| Tremellaceae | Basidiomycetes | 0.669 | 3.124 | |
| Tremellaceae | Basidiomycetes | 0.000 | 3.124 | |
| Tremellaceae | Basidiomycetes | – | 3.124 | |
| Tremellaceae | Basidiomycetes | – | 3.124 | |
| Mucoraceae | Zygomycota | – | 0.000 | |
| Mucoraceae | Zygomycota | Singleton | 0.000 |