| Literature DB >> 26388845 |
Rebecca C Mueller1, Jayne Belnap2, Cheryl R Kuske1.
Abstract
Arid shrublands are stressful environments, typified by alkaline soils low in organic matter, with biologically-limiting extremes in water availability, temperature, and UV radiation. The widely-spaced plants and interspace biological soil crusts in these regions provide soil nutrients in a localized fashion, creating a mosaic pattern of plant- or crust-associated microhabitats with distinct nutrient composition. With sporadic and limited rainfall, nutrients are primarily retained in the shallow surface soil, patterning biological activity. We examined soil bacterial and fungal community responses to simulated nitrogen (N) deposition in an arid Larrea tridentata-Ambrosia dumosa field experiment in southern Nevada, USA, using high-throughput sequencing of ribosomal RNA genes. To examine potential interactions among the N application, microhabitat and soil depth, we sampled soils associated with shrub canopies and interspace biological crusts at two soil depths (0-0.5 or 0-10 cm) across the N-amendment gradient (0, 7, and 15 kg ha(-1) yr(-1)). We hypothesized that localized compositional differences in soil microbiota would constrain the impacts of N addition to a microhabitat distribution that would reflect highly localized geochemical conditions and microbial community composition. The richness and community composition of both bacterial and fungal communities differed significantly by microhabitat and with soil depth in each microhabitat. Only bacterial communities exhibited significant responses to the N addition. Community composition correlated with microhabitat and depth differences in soil geochemical features. Given the distinct roles of soil bacteria and fungi in major nutrient cycles, the resilience of fungi and sensitivity of bacteria to N amendments suggests that increased N input predicted for many arid ecosystems could shift nutrient cycling toward pathways driven primarily by fungal communities.Entities:
Keywords: biological soil crusts; dryland; global change; microhabitat; ribosomal RNA; shrubland; soil bacterial community; soil fungal community
Year: 2015 PMID: 26388845 PMCID: PMC4559666 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00891
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Left. Photo of Ambrosia dumosa shrub and surrounding interspace at the field site. Right. The sampling design used to examine bacterial and fungal communities in different locations in the soil.
Figure 2Rarefaction curves of (A) Fungal communities and (B) Bacterial communities.
Figure 3OTU richness and phylogenetic diversity (Faith's PD) in the N-amended plots across different soil depths and microhabitats. Both communities showed significant differences across soil depths and microhabitats, but only bacteria showed significant shifts in response to N. While results are illustrated here by individual treatment, the results were analyzed using a Three-Way ANOVA framework. See Results text for statistical support.
Figure 4Bray-Curtis dissimilarity among fungal or bacterial communities, displayed as 2D MDS plots. Plots are color coded to show microhabitat (red), soil depth (green), or N amendment (blue) differences. While results are presented for individual treatments, results were analyzed using a three-way framework with PERMANOVA. See Results text for statistical support.
Figure 5Community composition (UniFrac distance) of fungal or bacterial communities, displayed as 2D MDS plots. Plots are color coded to show microhabitat (red), soil depth (green), or N amendment (blue) differences. See Results text for statistical support.
Figure 6Relative abundance of different bacterial phyla (left) and fungal classes (right). Only groups with a minimum relative abundance of 1% are shown.
.
| Acidobacteria | 13.7 | ↑ | 6.0 | L | 65.5 | I |
| Actinobacteria | 10.1 | ↓ | 57.2 | L | 0.90 | |
| Armatimonadetes | 1.14 | 0.11 | 46.0 | I | ||
| Bacteroidetes | 2.91 | 73.9 | U | 92.3 | C | |
| Chloroflexi | 4.59 | ↓ | 55.6 | L | 45.8 | I |
| Firmicutes | 19.0 | ↑ | 0.01 | 23.2 | I | |
| Planctomycetes | 1.52 | 58.2 | L | 15.4 | C | |
| Proteobacteria | 9.62 | ↓ | 18.7 | U | 29.4 | C |
| Verrucomicrobia | 12.1 | ↑ | 6.80 | U | 10.2 | I |
Significance levels are represented as
p < 0.05,
p < 0.01,
p < 0.001. Nitrogen response indicates the overall trend of N response (positive or negative). Depth and microhabitat response indicates the factor where the highest abundance was observed, where U indicates upper biocrust soil layer, L indicates lower bulk soil layer, I indicates interspace soils, C indicates shrub canopy soils.
Indicates a significant interaction between N and soil depth.
Indicates a significant interaction between soil depth and microhabitat.
The arrows correspond to positive or negative responses to nitrogen.