| Literature DB >> 33178161 |
Yuanming Xiao1,2, Changbin Li1,2, Yang Yang1,2, Yunfeng Peng3, Yuanhe Yang3, Guoying Zhou1,4,5.
Abstract
Global climate change andEntities:
Keywords: climate change; community assembly; phylogenetic community structure; soil fungi; structural equation model
Year: 2020 PMID: 33178161 PMCID: PMC7597393 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.579072
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Geographical location and photographs of the experimental site. (A) Geographical location; (B) overview of the experimental site; (C) 50% precipitation reduction treatment; (D) 50% precipitation addition treatment; (E) nitrogen addition treatment.
Soil environmental factors and plant species richness under nitrogen addition and precipitation changes.
| NP − | 13.37 ± 1.08c | 7.98 ± 0.06b | 17.46 ± 0.72b | 265.00 ± 12.38ab | 5.01 ± 0.21a | 352.55 ± 43.83a | 7.80 ± 0.66b |
| NP (Control) | 17.07 ± 0.83ab | 8.11 ± 0.08ab | 16.85 ± 0.99b | 265.20 ± 16.13ab | 3.66 ± 0.68bc | 316.80 ± 59.48a | 11.40 ± 1.08a |
| NP + | 19.33 ± 1.22a | 8.17 ± 0.03a | 19.13 ± 1.05ab | 241.60 ± 10.22b | 3.60 ± 0.27bc | 311.59 ± 34.52a | 13.60 ± 0.93a |
| N + P− | 14.93 ± 0.39bc | 7.75 ± 0.05c | 20.18 ± 0.85a | 286.80 ± 3.60a | 4.82 ± 0.35ab | 325.59 ± 29.85a | 5.00 ± 0.45c |
| N + P | 16.77 ± 1.30ab | 7.99 ± 0.06b | 21.07 ± 0.49a | 238.20 ± 7.63b | 4.35 ± 0.26ab | 355.64 ± 50.86a | 7.00 ± 0.71bc |
| N + P + | 19.18 ± 0.70a | 8.11 ± 0.03ab | 18.86 ± 0.45ab | 247.40 ± 16.55b | 3.08 ± 0.40c | 369.62 ± 15.31a | 6.60 ± 1.08bc |
| Significance of | |||||||
| N | 0.718 | 0.959 | 0.981 | 0.461 | |||
| P | 0.981 | 0.993 | |||||
| N × P | 0.661 | 0.266 | 0.099 | 0.355 | 0.702 | 0.061 | |
| Block | 0.931 | 0.677 | 0.931 | 0.430 | 0.615 | 0.999 | 0.334 |
FIGURE 2Average relative abundances (%) of the top 10 fungal groups at the class level found at each treatment. Others present the sum of other classes of fungi outside the top 10 in this study. N (ambient N), N + (N addition), P (ambient precipitation), P + (50% added precipitation), and P− (50% reduction in precipitation).
FIGURE 3Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinations based on Bray–Curtis distance dissimilarity matrix of soil fungal Operational taxonomic unit (OTU) taxon composition.
Results of permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) for fungal community composition, and significant effects (P < 0.05) are highlighted in bold.
| N | 1.7505 | 0.0487 | |
| P | 3.1996 | 0.1781 | |
| N × P | 1.3753 | 0.0765 | |
| Block | 1.2601 | 0.1403 | 0.062 |
FIGURE 4Diversity and effect size relative to neutral prediction based on null model analysis of Bray–Curtis dissimilarity of soil fungal community across treatments. (A) OTU richness; (B) Chao 1 index; (C) Shannon–Wiener index; (D) effect size (relative to neutral prediction). Lowercase letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Student’s t-test was used to determine the difference between effect size of community assembly and zero, and significant differences of these diversity indicators between treatments were examined using Tukey’s test at P < 0.05.
Spearman’s correlation analysis between soil fungal community composition and soil environmental factors and plant species richness, and the response variable was the first axes of the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS).
| Soil moisture | ||
| Soil pH | ||
| Soil organic C | −0.1275 | 0.5018 |
| Soil available N | ||
| Soil available P | ||
| Soil available K | −0.2289 | 0.2238 |
| Plant species richness | ||
FIGURE 5Co-occurrence patterns of soil fungal taxon at OTU level for NP− treatment (A), NP treatment (B), NP + treatment (C), N + P− treatment (D), N + P (E), and N + P + treatment (F). The size of nodes was proportional to the link numbers of each node. Nodes in different colors are representative of the top 10 classes and other classes. Edges are shown with orange lines (positive interaction) and green lines (negative interaction). In each subfigure, only the top 400 OTUs and edges with Spearman’s ρ > 0.60 or < −0.6 and P < 0.05 are shown.
FIGURE 6Compositions of fungal functional group (guild) inferred by FUNGuild, Agaricomycetes (A) and Sordariomycetes (B).