Swati Gupta1, Vinay Kumar Vellanki2, Vikram K Shetty3, Sudhanshu Kushwah1, Geeta Goyal4, S M Sharath Chandra5. 1. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Ideas Dental College , Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India . 2. Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry Dentistry and Endodontics, Malla Reddy Institute of Dental Sciences , Hyderabad, Telangana, India . 3. Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Melaka Manipal Medical College , Melaka, Malaysia . 4. Reader, Department of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Maharaja Ganga Singh Dental College & Research Centre , Sri Ganganagar, Rajasthan, India . 5. Professor & Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Krishnadevaraya College of Dental Sciences , Bangalore, Karnataka, India .
Abstract
AIMS: To compare the shear bond strength of nanocomposites to dentin using three different types of adhesive systems; and to test few specimens under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for analysing whether the bond failure is adhesive or cohesive. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty human premolar teeth were selected and were randomly grouped, with 20 specimens in each group: group 1 - fluoride releasing dentin bonding agent; group 2 - antibacterial containing dentin bonding agent; and group 3 - one step conventional self etch adhesive. Each group was treated with its respective bonding agents, composite resin build up was done, and shear bond strengths were tested using Instron Universal testing machine. Few of the specimens were tested under SEM. RESULTS: The results were statistically analysed using One-way ANOVA and paired t-test. It was observed that group 3 has the highest shear bond strength followed by group 2, and then group 1. Adhesive failures and mixed failures were most frequent types of failures as seen under SEM. CONCLUSION: Addition of antimicrobial agent decreases the bond strength of dentin bonding agent and addition of fluoride further decreases the bond strength. From SEM results it can be concluded that the zone of failure could not be defined and also that the failure mode was independent of the dentin bonding agent used.
AIMS: To compare the shear bond strength of nanocomposites to dentin using three different types of adhesive systems; and to test few specimens under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for analysing whether the bond failure is adhesive or cohesive. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty human premolar teeth were selected and were randomly grouped, with 20 specimens in each group: group 1 - fluoride releasing dentin bonding agent; group 2 - antibacterial containing dentin bonding agent; and group 3 - one step conventional self etch adhesive. Each group was treated with its respective bonding agents, composite resin build up was done, and shear bond strengths were tested using Instron Universal testing machine. Few of the specimens were tested under SEM. RESULTS: The results were statistically analysed using One-way ANOVA and paired t-test. It was observed that group 3 has the highest shear bond strength followed by group 2, and then group 1. Adhesive failures and mixed failures were most frequent types of failures as seen under SEM. CONCLUSION: Addition of antimicrobial agent decreases the bond strength of dentin bonding agent and addition of fluoride further decreases the bond strength. From SEM results it can be concluded that the zone of failure could not be defined and also that the failure mode was independent of the dentin bonding agent used.
Entities:
Keywords:
Antibacterial; Dentin bonding agents; Fluorides; Nanocomposites; Self etch adhesives; Shear bond strength; Total etch adhesives
Authors: Salvatore Sauro; David H Pashley; Marco Montanari; Stefano Chersoni; Ricardo M Carvalho; Manuel Toledano; Raquel Osorio; Franklin R Tay; Carlo Prati Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2006-08-09 Impact factor: 5.304