Literature DB >> 12554121

Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes.

Franklin R Tay1, David H Pashley, Byoung I Suh, Ricardo M Carvalho, Anut Itthagarun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study tested the hypotheses that micro-tensile bond strengths of all currently available single-step adhesives to dentine are adversely affected by delayed activation of a light-cured composite, and that such a phenomenon only occurs in the presence of water from the substrate side of the bonded interface.
METHODS: In experiment I, a control three-step adhesive (All-Bond 2, Bisco) and six single-step adhesives (One-Up Bond F, Tokuyama; Etch&Prime 3.0, Degussa; Xeno CF Bond, Sankin; AQ Bond, Sun Medical; Reactmer Bond, Shofu and Prompt L-Pop, 3M ESPE) were bonded to sound, hydrated dentine. A microfilled composite was placed over the cured adhesive and was either light-activated immediately, or after leaving the composite in the dark for 20 min. In experiment II, three single-step adhesives (Etch&Prime 3.0, Xeno CF Bond and AQ Bond) were similarly bonded to completely dehydrated dentine using the same delayed light-activation protocol. In experiment III, a piece of processed composite was used as the bonding substrate for the same three single-step adhesives. The microfilled composite was applied to the cured adhesives using the same immediate and delayed light-activation protocols. Bonded specimens were sectioned for micro-tensile bond strength evaluation. Fractographic analysis of the specimens was performed using SEM. Stained, undemineralised sections of unstressed, bonded specimens were also examined by TEM.
RESULTS: When bonded to hydrated dentine, delayed light-activation had no effect on the control three-step adhesive, but significantly lowered the bond strengths of all the single-step adhesives (p < 0.05). This adverse effect of delayed light-activation was not observed in the three single-step adhesives that were bonded to either dehydrated dentine or processed composite. Morphological manifestations of delayed light-activation of composite in the hydrated dentine bonding substrate were exclusively located along the composite-adhesive interface, and were present as large voids, resin globules and honeycomb structures that formed partitions around a myriad of small blisters along the fractured interfaces.
CONCLUSION: These features resembled the 'overwet phenomenon' that was previously reported along the dentine-adhesive interfaces of some acetone-based three-step adhesives. The cured adhesive layer in single-step adhesives may act as semi-permeable membranes that allow water diffusion from the bonded hydrated dentine to the intermixed zone between the adhesive and the uncured composite. Osmotic blistering of water droplets along the surface of the cured adhesive layer and emulsion polymerisation of immiscible resin components probably account for the compromised bond strength in single-step adhesives after delayed activation of light-cured composites. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12554121     DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(02)00064-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  78 in total

1.  Shear bond strengths of seven self-etching primers after thermo-cycling.

Authors:  L Brauchli; M Zeller; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Measurement of microstrains across loaded resin-dentin interfaces using microscopic moiré interferometry.

Authors:  Judy D Wood; Paul Sobolewski; Varun Thakur; Dwayne Arola; Ahmed Nazari; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Effect of sonic application mode on the resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified self-etch adhesive.

Authors:  Alexandra Mena-Serrano; Eugenio Jose Garcia; Alessandro Dourado Loguercio; Alessandra Reis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Use of a specific MMP-inhibitor (galardin) for preservation of hybrid layer.

Authors:  Lorenzo Breschi; Patrizia Martin; Annalisa Mazzoni; Fernando Nato; Marcela Carrilho; Leo Tjäderhane; Erika Visintini; Milena Cadenaro; Franklin R Tay; Elettra De Stefano Dorigo; David H Pashley
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Nanoleakage related to bond strength in RM-GIC and adhesive restorations.

Authors:  M Marquezan; J A Skupien; B L da Silveira; A Ciamponi
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2011-02

6.  Adhesion of conventional and simplified resin-based luting cements to superficial and deep dentin.

Authors:  Mutlu Özcan; Ayse Mese
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.

Authors:  Bruno Baracco; M Victoria Fuentes; Laura Ceballos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Influence of different initiators on the degree of conversion of experimental adhesive blends in relation to their hydrophilicity and solvent content.

Authors:  Milena Cadenaro; Francesca Antoniolli; Barbara Codan; Kelli Agee; Franklin R Tay; Elettra De Stefano Dorigo; David H Pashley; Lorenzo Breschi
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 5.304

9.  Ultrastructural examination of one-step self-etch adhesive bonded primary sound and caries-affected dentin.

Authors:  Yumiko Hosoya; Franklin R Tay; Franklin García-Godoy; David H Pashley
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.522

10.  Influence of chlorhexidine concentration on the durability of etch-and-rinse dentin bonds: a 12-month in vitro study.

Authors:  Lorenzo Breschi; Federica Cammelli; Erika Visintini; Annalisa Mazzoni; Francesca Vita; Marcela Carrilho; Milena Cadenaro; Stephen Foulger; Giovanni Mazzoti; Franklin R Tay; Roberto Di Lenarda; David Pashley
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.