OBJECTIVES: Dentin bonds made with one-bottle etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives are affected by the formation of interfacial blisters, porosities and deterioration. The first objective of this study was to evaluate the fluid flow through resin-dentin interfaces created by self-etching adhesives applied to deep dentin using a replica technique and by directly measuring dentin permeability (P). The second objective was to examine the effect of intrapulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of these adhesives. METHODS: A fluid-transport model was used to measure the fluid permeability (%P) through different adhesives. Impressions of bonded dentin were taken with a polyvinylsiloxane impression material to monitor fluid transudation from the surface of the adhesive. Positive replicas were fabricated for SEM examination. Two groups of resin-bonded specimens (pulpal pressure versus no pulpal pressure) were created for microtensile bond strength evaluation. Adhesive application was performed under 0 cm H(2)O. Pulpal pressure group was submitted to 20 cm H(2)O of pulpal pressure during build-up procedures. RESULTS: Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited the lowest permeability and fewest numbers of fluid droplets over the surface of the bonded dentin. G-Bond and Clearfil-S3 Bond were more permeable than Clearfil Protect Bond. One Up Bond F was the most permeable adhesive. A highly significant correlation was observed between the relative permeability of these adhesives (%P) and the number of fluid droplets on the adhesive surfaces. The application of pulpal pressure significantly reduced bond strength. SIGNIFICANCE: Resin-dentin bonds created by contemporary self-etch adhesives are susceptible to fluid permeation induced by pulpal pressure. HEMA-based adhesives showed the largest reductions in bond strengths after pulpal pressure application.
OBJECTIVES: Dentin bonds made with one-bottle etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives are affected by the formation of interfacial blisters, porosities and deterioration. The first objective of this study was to evaluate the fluid flow through resin-dentin interfaces created by self-etching adhesives applied to deep dentin using a replica technique and by directly measuring dentin permeability (P). The second objective was to examine the effect of intrapulpal pressure on the microtensile bond strength of these adhesives. METHODS: A fluid-transport model was used to measure the fluid permeability (%P) through different adhesives. Impressions of bonded dentin were taken with a polyvinylsiloxane impression material to monitor fluid transudation from the surface of the adhesive. Positive replicas were fabricated for SEM examination. Two groups of resin-bonded specimens (pulpal pressure versus no pulpal pressure) were created for microtensile bond strength evaluation. Adhesive application was performed under 0 cm H(2)O. Pulpal pressure group was submitted to 20 cm H(2)O of pulpal pressure during build-up procedures. RESULTS: Clearfil Protect Bond exhibited the lowest permeability and fewest numbers of fluid droplets over the surface of the bonded dentin. G-Bond and Clearfil-S3 Bond were more permeable than Clearfil Protect Bond. One Up Bond F was the most permeable adhesive. A highly significant correlation was observed between the relative permeability of these adhesives (%P) and the number of fluid droplets on the adhesive surfaces. The application of pulpal pressure significantly reduced bond strength. SIGNIFICANCE: Resin-dentin bonds created by contemporary self-etch adhesives are susceptible to fluid permeation induced by pulpal pressure. HEMA-based adhesives showed the largest reductions in bond strengths after pulpal pressure application.
Authors: T M Silva; L L Gonçalves; B M Fonseca; S R M S Esteves; D C Barcellos; A J Damião; S E P Gonçalves Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Débora Lopes Salles Scheffel; Nancy Tomoko Sacono; Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Diana Gabriela Soares; Fernanda Gonçalves Basso; David Pashley; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa; Josimeri Hebling Journal: J Dent Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Diana Gabriela Soares; Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Fernanda da Silveira Vargas; Josimeri Hebling; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Marcela R Carrilho; Franklin R Tay; Adam M Donnelly; Kelli A Agee; Ricardo M Carvalho; Keiichi Hosaka; Alessandra Reis; Alessandro D Loguercio; David H Pashley Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Salvatore Sauro; Timothy F Watson; Francesco Mannocci; Franklin R Tay; David H Pashley Journal: J Adhes Dent Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.359