INTRODUCTION: We evaluate the associations between 3 renal tumour scoring systems and their components with perioperative complications of partial nephrectomy. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of partial nephrectomy patients was analyzed. Patient characteristics were abstracted from medical records. PADUA scores (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic classification), RENAL (radius exophyic/endophytic nearness anterior/posterior location scoring) nephrometry scores, and Centrality index (C-index) were determined from preoperative axial images by 2 independent reviewers. Cases were evaluated for postoperative complications up to 30 days after surgery. Pre-specified complication definitions were used for 33 potential medical and surgical complications. Unadjusted and adjusted associations between overall scores, individual components, and complications were determined using log binomial regression. RESULTS: In total, 118 patients were included in the study. Of these, 36 (30.5%) surgical complications occurred in 27 (22.9%) patients. Fourteen (11.9%) were Clavien grade ≥3. Overall PADUA score was significantly associated with surgical and overall complications after adjusting for potential confounders. Among all components of the 3 scoring systems, only tumour diameter and exophytic/endophytic nature of the tumour were significantly associated with complications after adjusting for the other components of the respective scoring system (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Renal tumour scoring systems may help predict the risk of complications after partial nephrectomy. Further refinement of current systems is required. A first step would be to include only components that are significantly associated with complications.
INTRODUCTION: We evaluate the associations between 3 renal tumour scoring systems and their components with perioperative complications of partial nephrectomy. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of partial nephrectomy patients was analyzed. Patient characteristics were abstracted from medical records. PADUA scores (preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic classification), RENAL (radius exophyic/endophytic nearness anterior/posterior location scoring) nephrometry scores, and Centrality index (C-index) were determined from preoperative axial images by 2 independent reviewers. Cases were evaluated for postoperative complications up to 30 days after surgery. Pre-specified complication definitions were used for 33 potential medical and surgical complications. Unadjusted and adjusted associations between overall scores, individual components, and complications were determined using log binomial regression. RESULTS: In total, 118 patients were included in the study. Of these, 36 (30.5%) surgical complications occurred in 27 (22.9%) patients. Fourteen (11.9%) were Clavien grade ≥3. Overall PADUA score was significantly associated with surgical and overall complications after adjusting for potential confounders. Among all components of the 3 scoring systems, only tumour diameter and exophytic/endophytic nature of the tumour were significantly associated with complications after adjusting for the other components of the respective scoring system (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Renal tumour scoring systems may help predict the risk of complications after partial nephrectomy. Further refinement of current systems is required. A first step would be to include only components that are significantly associated with complications.
Authors: Scott Leslie; Inderbir S Gill; Andre Luis de Castro Abreu; Syed Rahmanuddin; Karanvir S Gill; Mike Nguyen; Andre K Berger; Alvin C Goh; Jie Cai; Vinay A Duddalwar; Monish Aron; Mihir M Desai Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Hendrik Van Poppel; Luigi Da Pozzo; Walter Albrecht; Vsevolod Matveev; Aldo Bono; Andrzej Borkowski; Marc Colombel; Laurence Klotz; Eila Skinner; Thomas Keane; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Richard Sylvester Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-12-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: M N Hew; B Baseskioglu; K Barwari; P H Axwijk; C Can; S Horenblas; A Bex; J J M C H de la Rosette; M P Laguna Pes Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-05-14 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Sean P Stroup; Kerrin Palazzi; Ryan P Kopp; Reza Mehrazin; Michael Santomauro; Seth A Cohen; Anthony L Patterson; James O L'Esperance; Ithaar H Derweesh Journal: Urology Date: 2012-07 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Luke T Lavallée; Darren Desantis; Fadi Kamal; Brian Blew; James Watterson; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson; Christopher Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Rodney H Breau Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013-04-16 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Youssef S Tanagho; Jihad H Kaouk; Mohamad E Allaf; Craig G Rogers; Michael D Stifelman; Bartosz F Kaczmarek; Shahab P Hillyer; Jeffrey K Mullins; Yichun Chiu; Sam B Bhayani Journal: Urology Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Patrick O Richard; Philippe D Violette; Bimal Bhindi; Rodney H Breau; Wassim Kassouf; Luke T Lavallée; Michael Jewett; John R Kachura; Anil Kapoor; Maxine Noel-Lamy; Michael Ordon; Stephen E Pautler; Frédéric Pouliot; Alan I So; Ricardo A Rendon; Simon Tanguay; Christine Collins; Maryam Kandi; Bobby Shayegan; Andrew Weller; Antonio Finelli; Andrea Kokorovic; Jay Nayak Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Burkhard Ubrig; Alexander Roosen; Christian Wagner; Guenter Trabs; Frank Schiefelbein; Jorn H Witt; Georg Schoen; Nina Natascha Harke Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 4.226