Literature DB >> 21571340

Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy.

M N Hew1, B Baseskioglu, K Barwari, P H Axwijk, C Can, S Horenblas, A Bex, J J M C H de la Rosette, M P Laguna Pes.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We validated the PADUA classification and assessed the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score to predict perioperative complications of partial nephrectomy. In addition, we assessed their interobserver variability, and the ability to predict the use of ischemia and ischemia time.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from consecutive cases of partial nephrectomy with or without ischemia from 3 centers were retrospectively collected. Associations between preoperative variables and complications were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Reproducibility was assessed by determining Fleiss' generalized kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients in a subcohort scored by 3 physicians with different degrees of urological expertise.
RESULTS: A total of 134 partial nephrectomies were included in the study and 31 cases (23%) presented with complications. On univariate analyses complications were associated with age (p = 0.02), tumor size on computerized tomography (p = 0.01), pT stage (p = 0.001), and PADUA (p = 0.001) and R.E.N.A.L. scores (p = 0.02). In 3 multivariate models PADUA score 10 or greater (OR 3.98, p = 0.01), R.E.N.A.L. score 9 or greater (OR 4.21, p = 0.02), tumor size in cm (OR 1.35, p = 0.02) and age (OR 1.04, p = 0.04) were independent predictors of complications. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score predicted the use of ischemia (p = 0.03) and both scores predicted ischemia time (both p <0.001). Kappa was 0.37 to 0.80 for PADUA components and 0.23 to 0.73 for R.E.N.A.L. components. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.73 for PADUA and 0.70 for R.E.N.A.L. score.
CONCLUSIONS: The highest categories of PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. scores as well as clinical tumor size predict the risk of perioperative complications of partial nephrectomy. Both scores can indicate ischemia time. Their reproducibility is substantial but the implementation of these systems in clinical practice needs further refinement.
Copyright © 2011 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21571340     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  39 in total

1.  Novel kidney segmentation system to describe tumour location for nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Rocco Papalia; Andre Luis De Castro Abreu; Valeria Panebianco; Vinay Duddalwar; Giuseppe Simone; Scott Leslie; Salvatore Guaglianone; Tapas Tejura; Mariaconsiglia Ferriero; Maunela Costantini; Mihir Desai; Michele Gallucci; Inderbir Singh Gill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Analysis of the impact of adherent perirenal fat on peri-operative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Zine-Eddine Khene; Benoit Peyronnet; Romain Mathieu; Tarek Fardoun; Grégory Verhoest; Karim Bensalah
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Evaluation of surgery-related kidney volume loss to predict the outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with segmental renal artery clamping.

Authors:  Jie Jiang; Jian Qian; Qian Zhang; Shaobo Zhang; Pu Li; Chao Qin; Jie Li; Qiang Cao; Pengfei Shao
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Surgeon-specific factors affecting treatment decisions among Canadian urologists in the management of pT1a renal tumours.

Authors:  Alexandra Leora Millman; Kenneth T Pace; Michael Ordon; Jason Young Lee
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 5.  Zero ischaemia partial nephrectomy: a call for standardized nomenclature and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmad Alenezi; Giacomo Novara; Alexander Mottrie; Salah Al-Buheissi; Omer Karim
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 14.432

6.  Microwave ablation of malignant renal tumours: intermediate-term results and usefulness of RENAL and mRENAL scores for predicting outcomes and complications.

Authors:  Anna Maria Ierardi; Alessio Puliti; Salvatore Alessio Angileri; Mario Petrillo; Ejona Duka; Chiara Floridi; Michela Lecchi; Gianpaolo Carrafiello
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  An Arterial Based Complexity (ABC) Scoring System to Assess the Morbidity Profile of Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Massimiliano Spaliviero; Bing Ying Poon; Christoph A Karlo; Giuliano B Guglielmetti; Pier Luigi Di Paolo; Renato Beluco Corradi; Alexandre G Martin-Malburet; Felix Campos-Juanatey; Eva Escudero-Fontano; Daniel D Sjoberg; Paul Russo; Jonathan A Coleman; Oguz Akin; Karim A Touijer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 8.  Nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Paul Maroni; Jacob Moss
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 9.  A Literature Review of Renal Surgical Anatomy and Surgical Strategies for Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Vincenzo Ficarra; Christian Gratzke; Jihad Kaouk; Alexander Kutikov; Veronica Macchi; Alexandre Mottrie; Francesco Porpiglia; James Porter; Craig G Rogers; Paul Russo; R Houston Thompson; Robert G Uzzo; Christopher G Wood; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Factors Influencing the Operative Approach to Renal Tumors: Analyses According to RENAL Nephrometry Scores.

Authors:  Jeong Hyun Oh; Hyun Yul Rhew; Taek Sang Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-02-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.