Literature DB >> 29380129

Tumor complexity and the impact on MIC and trifecta in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-center study of over 500 cases.

Burkhard Ubrig1, Alexander Roosen1, Christian Wagner2, Guenter Trabs3, Frank Schiefelbein3, Jorn H Witt2, Georg Schoen3, Nina Natascha Harke4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the surgical feasibility of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal masses with comparison of low/intermediate risk versus high-risk tumors according to the PADUA score.
METHODS: Since 2008, 538 robot-assisted partial nephrectomies were performed at three German robotic centers. Both the MIC (margin, ischemia, complications) criteria and trifecta were applied.
RESULTS: 60.1% of the tumors were of low and intermediate complexity (PADUA score 6-9, n = 326, group A), while 39.9% were highly complex (n = 212, score ≥ 10, B). Median clinical tumor size was 28 in A versus 37 mm in B (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in terms of operative time (160 vs. 163 min, p = 0.20); ischemia time was slightly longer for B (11 vs. 12 min, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences for intra- (3.4%, A, vs. 6.6%, B, p = 0.10) or postoperative (21.5%, A, vs. 25.5%, B, p = 0.30) complication rates. There was a median eGFR decrease of - 9.4 (A) versus - 15.1 (B) ml/min (p < 0.001) on discharge. Histopathology revealed an R1 margin rate of 3.4% for the low/intermediate versus 6.1% for the high complexity group (p = 0.14). MIC criteria were fulfilled in 81.9% (A) versus 75.5% (B, p = 0.11) and trifecta criteria in 74.2% (A) versus 68.93% (B, p = 0.26).
CONCLUSIONS: Complication rates, histopathology results as well as quality criteria as indicated by MIC and trifecta were similar for high and low complexity groups. Therefore, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy is a safe and feasible option also in highly complex tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complex tumor; Nephrometry; Renal mass; Robotic partial nephrectomy; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29380129     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2191-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  29 in total

1.  A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hendrik Van Poppel; Luigi Da Pozzo; Walter Albrecht; Vsevolod Matveev; Aldo Bono; Andrzej Borkowski; Marc Colombel; Laurence Klotz; Eila Skinner; Thomas Keane; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Richard Sylvester
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-12-22       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  Renal Function is Associated with Nephrometry Score After Partial Nephrectomy: A Study Using Diethylene Triamine Penta-Acetic Acid (DTPA) Renal Scanning.

Authors:  Taekmin Kwon; In Gab Jeong; Jeman Ryu; Chunwoo Lee; Chanwoo Lee; Dalsan You; Choung-Soo Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Multi-institutional analysis of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumors >4 cm versus ≤ 4 cm in 445 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Firas Petros; Shyam Sukumar; Georges-Pascal Haber; Lori Dulabon; Sam Bhayani; Michael Stifelman; Jihad Kaouk; Craig Rogers
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Association of tumor size, location, R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and centrality index score with perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function.

Authors:  Jason R Bylund; Dustin Gayheart; Tyler Fleming; Ramakrishna Venkatesh; David M Preston; Stephen E Strup; Paul L Crispen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Silvia Secco; Veronica Macchi; Andrea Porzionato; Raffaele De Caro; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Renal function after nephron-sparing surgery versus radical nephrectomy: results from EORTC randomized trial 30904.

Authors:  Emil Scosyrev; Edward M Messing; Richard Sylvester; Steven Campbell; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji Eun Choi; Ji Hye You; Dae Keun Kim; Koon Ho Rha; Seon Heui Lee
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database.

Authors:  Riccardo Schiavina; Giacomo Novara; Marco Borghesi; Vincenzo Ficarra; Rajesh Ahlawat; Daniel A Moon; Francesco Porpiglia; Benjamin J Challacombe; Prokar Dasgupta; Eugenio Brunocilla; Gaetano La Manna; Alessandro Volpe; Hema Verma; Giuseppe Martorana; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm.

Authors:  Manish N Patel; L Spencer Krane; Akshay Bhandari; Rajesh G Laungani; Alok Shrivastava; Sameer A Siddiqui; Mani Menon; Craig G Rogers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenjie Wu; Mingmin Li; Bing Liu; Chen Cai; Huamao Ye; Chen Lv; Qing Yang; Jing Sheng; Shangqing Song; Le Qu; Liang Xiao; Yinghao Sun; Linhui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for moderate to highly complex renal masses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gopal Sharma; Aditya Prakash Sharma; Shantanu Tyagi; Girdhar Singh Bora; Ravimohan Suryanarayan Mavuduru; Sudheer Kumar Devana; Shrawan Kumar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2022-07-01

2.  External validation of the Simplified PADUA REnal (SPARE) nephrometry system in predicting surgical outcomes after partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Chi-Ping Huang; Chao-Hsiang Chang; Hsi-Chin Wu; Che-Rei Yang; Po-Fan Hsieh; Guang-Heng Chen; Po-Jen Hsiao; Yi-Huei Chang; Yu-Ping Wang; Yu-De Wang
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.264

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.