Literature DB >> 23452807

Perioperative complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of 886 patients at 5 United States centers.

Youssef S Tanagho1, Jihad H Kaouk, Mohamad E Allaf, Craig G Rogers, Michael D Stifelman, Bartosz F Kaczmarek, Shahab P Hillyer, Jeffrey K Mullins, Yichun Chiu, Sam B Bhayani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review complications of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) at 5 centers, as classified by the Clavien system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-institutional analysis of prospectively maintained databases assessed RAPN complications. From June 2007 to November 2011, 886 patients at 5 United States centers underwent RAPN. Patient demographics, perioperative outcomes, and complications data were collected. Complication severity was classified by Clavien grade.
RESULTS: Mean (standard deviation) data were patient age, 59.4 (11.4) years; age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, 3.0 (1.9); radiographic tumor size, 3.0 (1.6) cm; nephrometry score, 6.9 (2.0); and warm ischemia time, 18.8 (9.0) minutes. Median blood loss was 100 mL (interquartile range, 100-250 mL). Of the 886 patients, intraoperative complications occurred in 23 patients (2.6%) and 139 postoperative complications occurred in 115 patients (13.0%) for a total complication rate of 15.6%. Among the 139 postoperative complications, 43 (30.9%) were classified as Clavien 1, 64 (46.0%) were Clavien 2, 21 (15.1%) were Clavien 3, and 11 (7.9%) were Clavien 4. No complication-related deaths occurred. Intraoperative hemorrhage occurred in 9 patients (1.0%) and postoperative hemorrhage in 51 (5.8%). Forty-one patients (4.6%) required a perioperative blood transfusion, 10 (1.1%) required angioembolization, and 2 (0.2%) required surgical reexploration for postoperative hemorrhage. Urine leaks developed in 10 patients (1.1%): 3 (0.3%) required ureteral stenting, and 2 (0.2%) required percutaneous drainage. Acute postoperative renal insufficiency or renal failure developed in 7 patients (0.8%), 2 of whom required hemodialysis. The RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, nearness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior descriptor and the location relative to polar lines) nephrometry scoring system accurately predicted RAPN complication rates.
CONCLUSION: Complication rates in this large multicenter series of RAPN appear to be acceptable and comparable with other nephron-sparing modalities. Most complications (77.0%) are Clavien 1 and 2 and can be managed conservatively.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23452807     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  28 in total

1.  Assessing the burden of complications after surgery for clinically localized kidney cancer by age and comorbidity status.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov; Katie Hrebinko; Reza Mehrazin; Anthony Corcoran; Serge Ginzburg; Rosalia Viterbo; David Y T Chen; Richard E Greenberg; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  The use of intraoperative cell salvage in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Matthew C Ferroni; Andres F Correa; Timothy D Lyon; Benjamin J Davies; Michael C Ost
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2017

Review 3.  What is next in robotic urology?

Authors:  Xavier Cathelineau; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Arjun Sivaraman
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Small renal masses: is LESS partial nephrectomy feasible for most urologists?

Authors:  Yu-Kuan Lin; Jay D Raman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma: Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum Consensus.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Anil Kapoor; Rodney Breau; Michael Leveridge; Andrew Feifer; Peter C Black; Alan So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 6.  Complications of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Their Management.

Authors:  Joshua R Kaplan; Ziho Lee; Daniel D Eun; Adam C Reese
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumours of high surgical complexity: a single-institute comparison between clampless and clamped procedures.

Authors:  Paolo Verze; Paolo Fedelini; Francesco Chiancone; Vito Cucchiara; Roberto La Rocca; Maurizio Fedelini; Clemente Meccariello; Alessandro Palmieri; Vincenzo Mirone
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Impact of Robotic Fellowship Experience on Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Michael A Moriarty; Kenneth G Nepple; Chad R Tracy; Michael E Strigenz; Daniel K Lee; James A Brown
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2016-02-10

9.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Early single Canadian institution experience.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Richard Haddad; Evan Kovac; Patrick Richard; Maurice Anidjar; Franck Bladou
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 10.  A Literature Review of Renal Surgical Anatomy and Surgical Strategies for Partial Nephrectomy.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Vincenzo Ficarra; Christian Gratzke; Jihad Kaouk; Alexander Kutikov; Veronica Macchi; Alexandre Mottrie; Francesco Porpiglia; James Porter; Craig G Rogers; Paul Russo; R Houston Thompson; Robert G Uzzo; Christopher G Wood; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.