Literature DB >> 25733434

Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study.

Ian J Litchfield1, Louise M Bentham2, Richard J Lilford3, Richard J McManus4, Sheila M Greenfield2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the number of blood tests ordered in primary care continues to increase, efficient systems for the communication of blood test results to patients are lacking. This is a concern in terms of both patient safety and patient satisfaction. AIM: To gain an understanding of patient perspectives on organisational and technological aspects of current and prospective systems for communicating laboratory test results in primary care, and the influences that impact patients' preferred methods for receiving results. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Qualitative study using patient focus groups in four primary care practices in Birmingham, UK.
METHOD: The primary care practices were purposively selected to ensure they varied in size, socioeconomic environment, and the default pathways they used to communicate test results. A total of 26 patients from the four practices who had had a recent blood test were recruited. Over a 6 month period in 2011, six, 1-hour focus groups were conducted at the four practices involved in the study.
RESULTS: Patients expressed a preference for receiving results from the ordering GP or a clinically qualified member of staff. Suggestions for refining current systems included improved access to phlebotomy appointments, better management of patient telephone calls, and a clear, accessible protocol for the communication of results.
CONCLUSION: Despite the testing and result communication process being a core activity in primary care, it was found that practices could improve their service in a number of areas. Patients described frequent delays and inconsistency in both the level of information and the method of communication, as well as dissatisfaction with non-clinical staff relaying results. Patient preferences for result communication based on their experience of current systems have produced practical suggestions to improve processes. © British Journal of General Practice 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic tests; patient safety; practice management; primary care; qualitative research; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25733434      PMCID: PMC4337301          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp15X683929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  24 in total

Review 1.  The enduring and evolving nature of the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  D Roter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2000-01

Review 2.  Use of constant comparative analysis in qualitative research.

Authors:  J Hewitt-Taylor
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  2001 Jul 4-10

3.  "But what does it mean for me?" Primary care patients' communication preferences for test results notification.

Authors:  Nancy C Elder; Kelley Barney
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2012-04

Review 4.  Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.

Authors:  Donald J Kiesler; Stephen M Auerbach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-12-20

5.  Canadians' Views about Health System Performance.

Authors:  Stephen Duckett; Annalise Kempton
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-02

6.  Optimizing primary care telephone access and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Sherri L LaVela; Jeffrey Gering; Gordon Schectman; Frances M Weaver
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 2.651

7.  Anxiety levels in women undergoing prenatal maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: the effect of a fast reporting system by mobile phone short-message service.

Authors:  Po-Jen Cheng; Tzong-Lin Wu; Sheng-Wen Shaw; Ho-Yen Chueh; Cheng-Tao Lin; Jenn-Jeih Hsu; T'sang-T'ang Hsieh; Yung-Kuei Soong
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  It's all about recognition! Qualitative study of the value of interpersonal continuity in general practice.

Authors:  Heidi Bøgelund Frederiksen; Jakob Kragstrup; Gitte Dehlholm-Lambertsen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Barriers for an effective communication around clinical decision making: an analysis of the gaps between doctors' and patients' point of view.

Authors:  José Joaquín Mira; Mercedes Guilabert; Virtudes Pérez-Jover; Susana Lorenzo
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Patient preferences for notification of normal laboratory test results: a report from the ASIPS Collaborative.

Authors:  Donna M Baldwin; Javán Quintela; Christine Duclos; Elizabeth W Staton; Wilson D Pace
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 2.497

View more
  17 in total

1.  GPs' understanding and practice of safety netting for potential cancer presentations: a qualitative study in primary care.

Authors:  Julie Evans; Sue Ziebland; John I MacArtney; Clare R Bankhead; Peter W Rose; Brian D Nicholson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Responsibility for follow-up during the diagnostic process in primary care: a secondary analysis of International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership data.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; Clare R Goyder; Clare R Bankhead; Berit S Toftegaard; Peter W Rose; Hans Thulesius; Peter Vedsted; Rafael Perera
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Quality improvements of safety-netting guidelines for cancer in UK primary care: insights from a qualitative interview study of GPs.

Authors:  Alice Tompson; Brian D Nicholson; Sue Ziebland; Julie Evans; Clare Bankhead
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  'I guess I'll wait to hear'- communication of blood test results in primary care a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jessica Watson; Chris Salisbury; Penny F Whiting; William T Hamilton; Jonathan Banks
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 6.302

5.  Communication of laboratory data and diagnostic test results to hospitalized patients: a study of preferences and recall.

Authors:  Muhammad W Athar; Christine Mativo; Regina Landis; Scott M Wright
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care lateral flow antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 with RT-PCR in primary care (REAP-2).

Authors:  Werner Leber; Oliver Lammel; Andrea Siebenhofer; Monika Redlberger-Fritz; Jasmina Panovska-Griffiths; Thomas Czypionka
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2021-07-13

7.  System hazards in managing laboratory test requests and results in primary care: medical protection database analysis and conceptual model.

Authors:  Paul Bowie; Julie Price; Neil Hepworth; Mark Dinwoodie; John McKay
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland.

Authors:  Jonathan Dash; Dagmar M Haller; Johanna Sommer; Noelle Junod Perron
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Test result communication in primary care: a survey of current practice.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Louise Bentham; Richard Lilford; Richard J McManus; Ann Hill; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Exploring the clinically orientated roles of the general practice receptionist: a systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Michael Burrows; Nicola Gale; Sheila Greenfield; Ian Litchfield
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-10-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.