Literature DB >> 22533129

"But what does it mean for me?" Primary care patients' communication preferences for test results notification.

Nancy C Elder1, Kelley Barney.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The best ways to communicate test results in primary care to achieve patient satisfaction and assist patients to incorporate results into their personal health decision making are unknown. A study was conducted to determine the factors that patients believe are important in achieving those goals.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of 12 adults, at least half with a chronic disease requiring regular testing, who shared experiences about receiving test results from physicians' offices and how they used them in their health decision making. In addition, "think aloud" interviewing techniques were used to assess participants' satisfaction and stated understanding with six different formats for receiving a hypothetical test result (a mildly elevated lipid profile). The interviews were analyzed using the editing technique to determine important factors in test results notification.
FINDINGS: Three themes were found to be important in satisfaction with and stated understanding and use of test results: (1) the information shared (test result, clinician interpretation and guidance), (2) significance of the results (testing purpose, abnormal or normal result) and (3) personal preferences for communication (timeliness, interpersonal connection, and hard copy). Participants' stated understanding was highest, among several potential formats, for actual values with desired/normal values, a low-literacy description of the test's purpose, and a simple graph.
CONCLUSIONS: A results notification algorithm includes (1) communication elements (the purpose of the test, the actual results with desired values, clinician guidance, and a graphical representation) and (2) appropriate choice of notification technique (phone/visit for diagnostic tests and all significantly abnormal results and mail/e-mail/Web for all others).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22533129     DOI: 10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38022-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  17 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Patient-Facing Visualizations of Personal Health Data.

Authors:  Meghan Reading Turchioe; Annie Myers; Samuel Isaac; Dawon Baik; Lisa V Grossman; Jessica S Ancker; Ruth Masterson Creber
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.342

2.  The PAADRN study: a design for a randomized controlled practical clinical trial to improve bone health.

Authors:  Stephanie W Edmonds; Fredric D Wolinsky; Alan J Christensen; Xin Lu; Michael P Jones; Douglas W Roblin; Kenneth G Saag; Peter Cram
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ian J Litchfield; Louise M Bentham; Richard J Lilford; Richard J McManus; Sheila M Greenfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills; Kathryn I Pollak; Catherine Rehder; Adam H Buchanan; Isaac M Lipkus; Jennifer H Crow; Michael Datto
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 11.117

5.  Communicating laboratory test results for rheumatoid factor: what do patients and physicians want?

Authors:  Ariella Kelman; Caroline O Robinson; Elisenda Cochin; Nina J Ahluwalia; Julia Braverman; Emil Chiauzzi; Kristina Simacek
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Communication of Pulmonary Function Test Results: A Survey of Patient's Preferences.

Authors:  Debbie Zagami; Jessica Hockenhull; Alanna Bodger; Krishna Bajee Sriram
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quality and safety issues highlighted by patients in the handling of laboratory test results by general practices--a qualitative study.

Authors:  David Edward Cunningham; Duncan McNab; Paul Bowie
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland.

Authors:  Jonathan Dash; Dagmar M Haller; Johanna Sommer; Noelle Junod Perron
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Test result communication in primary care: a survey of current practice.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Louise Bentham; Richard Lilford; Richard J McManus; Ann Hill; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  Patient perceptions of receiving test results via online portals: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Traber D Giardina; Jessica Baldwin; Daniel T Nystrom; Dean F Sittig; Hardeep Singh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.