Literature DB >> 18395869

Anxiety levels in women undergoing prenatal maternal serum screening for Down syndrome: the effect of a fast reporting system by mobile phone short-message service.

Po-Jen Cheng1, Tzong-Lin Wu, Sheng-Wen Shaw, Ho-Yen Chueh, Cheng-Tao Lin, Jenn-Jeih Hsu, T'sang-T'ang Hsieh, Yung-Kuei Soong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of fast reporting by mobile phone short-message service (SMS) on anxiety levels in women undergoing prenatal biochemical screening for Down syndrome.
METHOD: From January 2005 to December 2006, 2782 women undergoing prenatal biochemical serum screening were randomized into fast reporting by SMS (group A) or without mobile phone reporting (group B). Anxiety levels were measured with the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) before prenatal screen testing, before the appointed clinic (when the SMS report had already been given to group A), and 3 days after the appointed clinic (when the full screening report had been given to groups A and B).
RESULTS: For screen-negative women, anxiety scores did not differ between groups before prenatal screen testing and 3 days after the appointed clinic. The state-anxiety scores measured on the second occasion had declined significantly in group A. The state-anxiety scores in both groups increased over the 3-week period after being informed of positive screen results. The trait- and state-anxiety scores at all points did not differ between the two groups of screen-positive women.
CONCLUSIONS: The provision of a routine reporting system plus additional SMS report revealed some overall benefits in reducing anxiety among women with screen-negative result. 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18395869     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  10 in total

1.  Results of a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of a mobile SMS-based intervention on treatment adherence in HIV/AIDS-infected Brazilian women and impressions and satisfaction with respect to incoming messages.

Authors:  Thiago Martini da Costa; Bárbara Jaqueline Peres Barbosa; Durval Alex Gomes e Costa; Daniel Sigulem; Heimar de Fátima Marin; Adauto Castelo Filho; Ivan Torres Pisa
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 4.046

Review 2.  Mobile phone messaging for communicating results of medical investigations.

Authors:  Ipek Gurol-Urganci; Thyra de Jongh; Vlasta Vodopivec-Jamsek; Josip Car; Rifat Atun
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

3.  Patient perspectives on test result communication in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Ian J Litchfield; Louise M Bentham; Richard J Lilford; Richard J McManus; Sheila M Greenfield
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Communication Intervention Using Digital Technology to Facilitate Informed Choices at Childbirth in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Carmen Simone Grilo Diniz; Ana Carolina Arruda Franzon; Beatriz Fioretti-Foschi; Denise Yoshie Niy; Livia Sanches Pedrilio; Edson Amaro; João Ricardo Sato
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-05-21

5.  Effects of mHealth on the psychosocial health of pregnant women and mothers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jennifer Lisa Sakamoto; Rogie Royce Carandang; Madhu Kharel; Akira Shibanuma; Ekaterina Yarotskaya; Milana Basargina; Masamine Jimba
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 6.  The effectiveness of mobile-health technologies to improve health care service delivery processes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Caroline Free; Gemma Phillips; Louise Watson; Leandro Galli; Lambert Felix; Phil Edwards; Vikram Patel; Andy Haines
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 11.069

7.  Routine failures in the process for blood testing and the communication of results to patients in primary care in the UK: a qualitative exploration of patient and provider perspectives.

Authors:  Ian Litchfield; Louise Bentham; Ann Hill; Richard J McManus; Richard Lilford; Sheila Greenfield
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 8.  Improving Decision Making about Genetic Testing in the Clinic: An Overview of Effective Knowledge Translation Interventions.

Authors:  France Légaré; Hubert Robitaille; Claire Gane; Jessica Hébert; Michel Labrecque; François Rousseau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Effectiveness of mHealth interventions for maternal, newborn and child health in low- and middle-income countries: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Siew Hwa Lee; Ulugbek B Nurmatov; Bright I Nwaru; Mome Mukherjee; Liz Grant; Claudia Pagliari
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.413

10.  PRENACEL - a mHealth messaging system to complement antenatal care: a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Lívia Oliveira-Ciabati; Carolina Sales Vieira; Ana Carolina Arruda Franzon; Domingos Alves; Fabiani Spessoto Zaratini; Giordana Campos Braga; Jazmin Andrea Cifuentes Sanchez; Lívia Pimenta Bonifácio; Magna Santos Andrade; Mariana Fernandes; Silvana Maria Quintana; Suzi Volpato Fabio; Vicky Nogueira Pileggi; Elisabeth Meloni Vieira; João Paulo Souza
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.223

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.