Literature DB >> 25732488

New analysis reexamines the value of cancer care in the United States compared to Western Europe.

Samir Soneji1, JaeWon Yang2.   

Abstract

Despite sharp increases in spending on cancer treatment since 1970 in the United States compared to Western Europe, US cancer mortality rates have decreased only modestly. This has raised questions about the additional value of US cancer care derived from this additional spending. We calculated the number of US cancer deaths averted, compared to the situation in Western Europe, between 1982 and 2010 for twelve cancer types. We also assessed the value of US cancer care, compared to that in Western Europe, by estimating the ratio of additional spending on cancer to the number of quality-adjusted life-years saved. Compared to Western Europe, for three of the four costliest US cancers-breast, colorectal, and prostate-there were approximately 67,000, 265,000, and 60,000 averted US deaths, respectively, and for lung cancer there were roughly 1,120,000 excess deaths in the study period. The ratio of incremental cost to quality-adjusted life-years saved equaled $402,000 for breast cancer, $110,000 for colorectal cancer, and $1,979,000 for prostate cancer-amounts that exceed most accepted thresholds for cost-effective medical care. The United States lost quality-adjusted life-years despite additional spending for lung cancer: -$19,000 per quality-adjusted life-year saved. Our results suggest that cancer care in the United States may provide less value than corresponding cancer care in Western Europe for many leading cancers. Project HOPE—The People-to-People Health Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cost of Health Care; Demography; Developed World < International/global health studies; Epidemiology; Health Economics

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732488      PMCID: PMC4436656          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  33 in total

1.  Which medical conditions account for the rise in health care spending?

Authors:  Kenneth E Thorpe; Curtis S Florence; Peter Joski
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2004 Jul-Dec       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Cancer survival statistics should be viewed with caution.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Clarisse Héry; Eric Masuyer; Jacques Ferlay
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Kathleen A Cronin; Helen I Meissner; Stephen H Taplin; Florence K Tangka; Jasmin A Tiro; Timothy S McNeel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The global health burden of infection-associated cancers in the year 2002.

Authors:  Donald Maxwell Parkin
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Recent trends in colorectal cancer mortality in Europe.

Authors:  Cristina Bosetti; Fabio Levi; Valentina Rosato; Paola Bertuccio; Franca Lucchini; Eva Negri; Carlo La Vecchia
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Survival differences between European and US patients with colorectal cancer: role of stage at diagnosis and surgery.

Authors:  L Ciccolallo; R Capocaccia; M P Coleman; F Berrino; J W W Coebergh; R A M Damhuis; J Faivre; C Martinez-Garcia; H Møller; M Ponz de Leon; G Launoy; N Raverdy; E M I Williams; G Gatta
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Stage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across Europe.

Authors:  Milena Sant; Claudia Allemani; Riccardo Capocaccia; Timo Hakulinen; Tiiu Aareleid; Jan Willem Coebergh; Michel P Coleman; Pascale Grosclaude; Carmen Martinez; Janine Bell; Judith Youngson; Franco Berrino
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study.

Authors:  Dennis G Fryback; Nancy Cross Dunham; Mari Palta; Janel Hanmer; Jennifer Buechner; Dasha Cherepanov; Shani A Herrington; Ron D Hays; Robert M Kaplan; Theodore G Ganiats; David Feeny; Paul Kind
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Delivering maximum clinical benefit at an affordable price: engaging stakeholders in cancer care.

Authors:  Ronan J Kelly; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Breast cancer mortality in neighbouring European countries with different levels of screening but similar access to treatment: trend analysis of WHO mortality database.

Authors:  Philippe Autier; Mathieu Boniol; Anna Gavin; Lars J Vatten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-28
View more
  4 in total

1.  Trends in Healthcare Expenditures among Adults in the United States by Cancer Diagnosis Status, 2008-2016: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Shannon L Walker; Joni S Williams; Kaiwei Lu; Aprill Z Dawson; Leonard E Egede
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 4.090

2.  Comparison of Cancer-Related Spending and Mortality Rates in the US vs 21 High-Income Countries.

Authors:  Ryan D Chow; Elizabeth H Bradley; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-05-27

3.  Physician variation in lung cancer treatment at the end of life.

Authors:  Jonas B Green; Martin F Shapiro; Susan L Ettner; Jennifer Malin; Alfonso Ang; Mitchell D Wong
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.247

4.  Lung cancer mortality in Europe and the USA between 2000 and 2017: an observational analysis.

Authors:  Chinmay Jani; Dominic C Marshall; Harpreet Singh; Richard Goodall; Joseph Shalhoub; Omar Al Omari; Justin D Salciccioli; Carey C Thomson
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-12-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.