Literature DB >> 12845683

Stage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across Europe.

Milena Sant1, Claudia Allemani, Riccardo Capocaccia, Timo Hakulinen, Tiiu Aareleid, Jan Willem Coebergh, Michel P Coleman, Pascale Grosclaude, Carmen Martinez, Janine Bell, Judith Youngson, Franco Berrino.   

Abstract

We used multiple regression models to assess the influence of disease stage at diagnosis on the 5-year relative survival of 4,478 patients diagnosed with breast cancer in 1990-1992. The cases were representative samples from 17 population-based cancer registries in 6 European countries (Estonia, France, Italy, Netherlands, Spain and UK) that were combined into 9 regional groups based on similar survival. Five-year relative survival was 79% overall, varying from 98% for early, node-negative (T1N0M0) tumours; 87% for large, node-negative (T2-3N0M0) tumours; 76% for node-positive (T1-3N+M0) tumours and 55% for locally advanced (T4NxM0) tumours to 18% for metastatic (M1) tumours and 69% for tumours of unspecified stage. There was considerable variation across Europe in relative survival within each disease stage, but this was least marked for early node-negative tumours. Overall 5-year relative survival was highest in the French group of Bas-Rhin, Côte d'Or, Hérault and Isère (86%), and lowest in Estonia (66%). These geographic groups were characterised by the highest and lowest percentages of women with early stage disease (T1N0M0: 39% and 9%, respectively). The French, Dutch and Italian groups had the highest percentage of operated cases. The number of axillary nodes examined, a factor influencing nodal status, was highest in Italy and Spain. After adjusting for TNM stage and the number of nodes examined, survival differences were greatly reduced, indicating that for these women, diagnosed with breast cancer in Europe during 1990-1992, the survival differences were mainly due to differences in stage at diagnosis. However, in 3 regional groups, the relative risks of death remained high even after these adjustments, suggesting less than optimal treatment. Screening for breast cancer did not seem to affect the survival patterns once stage had been taken into account. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12845683     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.11226

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  83 in total

1.  Association between persistence with mammography screening and stage at diagnosis among elderly women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ami Vyas; Suresh Madhavan; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Female breast cancer in Gipuzkoa: prognostic factors and survival.

Authors:  N Larrañaga; C Sarasqueta; P Martínez-Camblor; M J Mitxelena; A Mendiola; I Martínez-Pueyo; M Basterretxea
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT provides powerful prognostic stratification in the primary staging of large breast cancer when compared with conventional explorations.

Authors:  Alexandre Cochet; Inna Dygai-Cochet; Jean-Marc Riedinger; Olivier Humbert; Alina Berriolo-Riedinger; Michel Toubeau; Séverine Guiu; Charles Coutant; Bruno Coudert; Pierre Fumoleau; François Brunotte
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  Breast screening review--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  M J Michell
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Optimizing cancer care through mobile health.

Authors:  Bassel Odeh; Reem Kayyali; Shereen Nabhani-Gebara; Nada Philip
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Are UK cancer cure rates worse than in most other European countries?

Authors:  Robert Souhami
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Expensive cancer drugs: a comparison between the United States and the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Ruth R Faden; Kalipso Chalkidou; John Appleby; Hugh R Waters; Jonathon P Leider
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.911

8.  Reducing racial/ethnic disparities in female breast cancer: screening rates and stage at diagnosis.

Authors:  Franco Sassi; Harold S Luft; Edward Guadagnoli
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 9.  Interventions to promote cancer awareness and early presentation: systematic review.

Authors:  J Austoker; C Bankhead; L J L Forbes; L Atkins; F Martin; K Robb; J Wardle; A J Ramirez
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cancer survival in England and the influence of early diagnosis: what can we learn from recent EUROCARE results?

Authors:  C S Thomson; D Forman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.