Literature DB >> 18007166

US norms for six generic health-related quality-of-life indexes from the National Health Measurement study.

Dennis G Fryback1, Nancy Cross Dunham, Mari Palta, Janel Hanmer, Jennifer Buechner, Dasha Cherepanov, Shani A Herrington, Ron D Hays, Robert M Kaplan, Theodore G Ganiats, David Feeny, Paul Kind.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of indexes measuring self-reported generic health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) using preference-weighted scoring are used widely in population surveys and clinical studies in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain age-by-gender norms for older adults on 6 generic HRQoL indexes in a cross-sectional US population survey and compare age-related trends in HRQoL.
METHODS: The EuroQol EQ-5D, Health Utilities Index Mark 2, Health Utilities Index Mark 3, SF-36v2 (used to compute SF-6D), Quality of Well-being Scale self-administered form, and Health and Activities Limitations index were administered via telephone interview to each respondent in a national survey sample of 3844 noninstitutionalized adults age 35-89. Persons age 65-89 and telephone exchanges with high percentages of African Americans were oversampled. Age-by-gender means were computed using sampling and poststratification weights to adjust results to the US adult population.
RESULTS: The 6 indexes exhibit similar patterns of age-related HRQoL by gender; however, means differ significantly across indexes. Females report slightly lower HRQoL than do males across all age groups. HRQoL seems somewhat higher for persons age 65-74 compared with people in the next younger age decade, as measured by all indexes.
CONCLUSIONS: Six HRQoL measures show similar but not identical trends in population norms for older US adults. Results reported here provide reference values for 6 self-reported HRQoL indexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18007166      PMCID: PMC2647803          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31814848f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  26 in total

Review 1.  SF-36 health survey update.

Authors:  J E Ware
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Summary measures of population health: methods for calculating healthy life expectancy.

Authors:  M T Molla; D K Wagener; J H Madans
Journal:  Healthy People 2010 Stat Notes       Date:  2001-08

Review 3.  HALYS and QALYS and DALYS, Oh My: similarities and differences in summary measures of population Health.

Authors:  Marthe R Gold; David Stevenson; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.

Authors:  John Brazier; Jennifer Roberts; Mark Deverill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12.

Authors:  John E Brazier; Jennifer Roberts
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Mode of administration is important in US national estimates of health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Janel Hanmer; Ron D Hays; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system.

Authors:  David Feeny; William Furlong; George W Torrance; Charles H Goldsmith; Zenglong Zhu; Sonja DePauw; Margaret Denton; Michael Boyle
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Methods for measuring levels of well-being for a health status index.

Authors:  D L Patrick; J W Bush; M M Chen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1973       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Analysis of health-related quality of life (HRQL), its distribution, and its distribution by income in Japan, 1989 and 1998.

Authors:  Yukiko Asada; Yasushi Ohkusa
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  193 in total

1.  Population norms for the EQ-5D index scores using Singapore preference weights.

Authors:  Edimansyah Abdin; Mythily Subramaniam; Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar; Nan Luo; Siow Ann Chong
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  A healthy bottom line: healthy life expectancy as an outcome measure for health improvement efforts.

Authors:  Matthew C Stiefel; Rocco J Perla; Bonnie L Zell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Health-related quality of life in Chinese patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.

Authors:  Fei-Li Zhao; Ming Yue; Hua Yang; Tian Wang; Jiu-Hong Wu; Shu-Chuen Li
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  State Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy for U.S. adults from 1993 to 2008.

Authors:  Haomiao Jia; Matthew M Zack; William W Thompson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Predictors of health utility among 60-day survivors of acute kidney injury in the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study.

Authors:  Kirsten L Johansen; Mark W Smith; Mark L Unruh; Andrew M Siroka; Theresa Z O'Connor; Paul M Palevsky
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Health Condition Impacts in a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Survey Vary Substantially by Preference-Based Health Index.

Authors:  Janel Hanmer; Dasha Cherepanov; Mari Palta; Robert M Kaplan; David Feeny; Dennis G Fryback
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  What Factors are Associated With Quality Of Life, Pain Interference, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Metastatic Bone Disease?

Authors:  Q M J van der Vliet; N R Paulino Pereira; S J Janssen; F J Hornicek; M L Ferrone; J A M Bramer; C N van Dijk; J H Schwab
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Quality and cost improvement of healthcare via complementary measurement and diagnosis of patient general health outcome using electronic health record data: research rationale and design.

Authors:  Rodolfo J Stusser; Richard A Dickey
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 4.460

9.  PedsQL relates to function and behavior in very low and normal birth weight 2- and 3-year-olds from a regional cohort.

Authors:  Mari Palta; Mona Sadek-Badawi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; Herng-Chia Chiu; Yih-Huei Uen; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.