L Arab1, A Ang. 1. L. Arab, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA. 700 Tiverton. 12-262 Factor Building, Box 951736, Los Angeles, CA 90095, larab@ucla.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between walnut consumption and measures of cognitive function in the US population. DESIGN: Nationally representative cross sectional study using 24 hour dietary recalls of intakes to assess walnut and other nut consumption as compared to the group reporting no nut consumption. SETTING: 1988-1994 and 1999-2002 rounds of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). POPULATION: Representative weighted sample of US adults 20 to 90 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Neurobehavioral Evaluation System 2 (NES2), consisting of simple reaction time (SRTT), symbol digit substitution (SDST), the single digit learning (SDLT), Story Recall (SRT) and digit-symbol substitution (DSST) tests. RESULTS: Adults 20-59 years old reporting walnut consumption of an average of 10.3 g/d required 16.4ms less time to respond on the SRTT, P=0.03, and 0.39s less for the SDST, P=0.01. SDLT scores were also significantly lower by 2.38s (P=0.05). Similar results were obtained when tertiles of walnut consumption were examined in trend analyses. Significantly better outcomes were noted in all cognitive test scores among those with higher walnut consumption (P < 0.01). Among adults 60 years and older, walnut consumers averaged 13.1 g/d, scored 7.1 percentile points higher, P=0.03 on the SRT and 7.3 percentile points higher on the DSST, P=0.05. Here also trend analyses indicate significant improvements in all cognitive test scores (P < 0.01) except for SRTT (P = 0.06) in the fully adjusted models. CONCLUSION: These significant, positive associations between walnut consumption and cognitive functions among all adults, regardless of age, gender or ethnicity suggest that daily walnut intake may be a simple beneficial dietary behavior.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between walnut consumption and measures of cognitive function in the US population. DESIGN: Nationally representative cross sectional study using 24 hour dietary recalls of intakes to assess walnut and other nut consumption as compared to the group reporting no nut consumption. SETTING: 1988-1994 and 1999-2002 rounds of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). POPULATION: Representative weighted sample of US adults 20 to 90 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The Neurobehavioral Evaluation System 2 (NES2), consisting of simple reaction time (SRTT), symbol digit substitution (SDST), the single digit learning (SDLT), Story Recall (SRT) and digit-symbol substitution (DSST) tests. RESULTS: Adults 20-59 years old reporting walnut consumption of an average of 10.3 g/d required 16.4ms less time to respond on the SRTT, P=0.03, and 0.39s less for the SDST, P=0.01. SDLT scores were also significantly lower by 2.38s (P=0.05). Similar results were obtained when tertiles of walnut consumption were examined in trend analyses. Significantly better outcomes were noted in all cognitive test scores among those with higher walnut consumption (P < 0.01). Among adults 60 years and older, walnut consumers averaged 13.1 g/d, scored 7.1 percentile points higher, P=0.03 on the SRT and 7.3 percentile points higher on the DSST, P=0.05. Here also trend analyses indicate significant improvements in all cognitive test scores (P < 0.01) except for SRTT (P = 0.06) in the fully adjusted models. CONCLUSION: These significant, positive associations between walnut consumption and cognitive functions among all adults, regardless of age, gender or ethnicity suggest that daily walnut intake may be a simple beneficial dietary behavior.
Authors: E F Krieg; D W Chrislip; R E Letz; D A Otto; C J Crespo; W S Brightwell; R L Ehrenberg Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2001 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Peter Pribis; Rudolph N Bailey; Andrew A Russell; Marcia A Kilsby; Magaly Hernandez; Winston J Craig; Tevni Grajales; David J Shavlik; Joan Sabatè Journal: Br J Nutr Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 3.718
Authors: Ramón Estruch; Emilio Ros; Jordi Salas-Salvadó; Maria-Isabel Covas; Dolores Corella; Fernando Arós; Enrique Gómez-Gracia; Valentina Ruiz-Gutiérrez; Miquel Fiol; José Lapetra; Rosa Maria Lamuela-Raventos; Lluís Serra-Majem; Xavier Pintó; Josep Basora; Miguel Angel Muñoz; José V Sorlí; José Alfredo Martínez; Miguel Angel Martínez-González Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-25 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amanda N Carey; Derek R Fisher; Donna F Bielinski; Danielle S Cahoon; Barbara Shukitt-Hale Journal: Inflammation Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 4.092
Authors: Lauren E Theodore; Nicole J Kellow; Emily A McNeil; Evangeline O Close; Eliza G Coad; Barbara R Cardoso Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Sze-Yen Tan; Ekavi N Georgousopoulou; Barbara R Cardoso; Robin M Daly; Elena S George Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Danielle Cahoon; Shruti P Shertukde; Esther E Avendano; Jirayu Tanprasertsuk; Tammy M Scott; Elizabeth J Johnson; Mei Chung; Nanguneri Nirmala Journal: Ann Med Date: 2021-12 Impact factor: 4.709