Literature DB >> 25732008

Improving Molecular Genetic Test Utilization through Order Restriction, Test Review, and Guidance.

Jacquelyn D Riley1, Gary W Procop1, Kandice Kottke-Marchant1, Robert Wyllie2, Felicitas L Lacbawan3.   

Abstract

The ordering of molecular genetic tests by health providers not well trained in genetics may have a variety of untoward effects. These include the selection of inappropriate tests, the ordering of panels when the assessment of individual or fewer genes would be more appropriate, inaccurate result interpretation and inappropriate patient guidance, and significant unwarranted cost expenditure. We sought to improve the utilization of molecular genetic tests by requiring providers without specialty training in genetics to use genetic counselors and molecular genetic pathologists to assist in test selection. We used a genetic and genomic test review process wherein the laboratory-based genetic counselor performed the preanalytic assessment of test orders and test triage. Test indication and clinical findings were evaluated against the test panel composition, methods, and test limitations under the supervision of the molecular genetic pathologist. These test utilization management efforts resulted in a decrease in genetic test ordering and a gross cost savings of $1,531,913 since the inception of these programs in September 2011 through December 2013. The combination of limiting the availability of complex genetic tests and providing guidance regarding appropriate test strategies is an effective way to improve genetic tests, contributing to judicious use of limited health care resources.
Copyright © 2015 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25732008      PMCID: PMC5707195          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  5 in total

1.  Confidence of primary care physicians in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks-a European survey in five countries-Part 1.

Authors:  Irmgard Nippert; Hilary J Harris; Claire Julian-Reynier; Ulf Kristoffersson; Leo P Ten Kate; Elizabeth Anionwu; Caroline Benjamin; Kirsty Challen; Jörg Schmidtke; R Peter Nippert; Rodney Harris
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2010-12-04

Review 2.  Genetic testing utilization and the role of the laboratory genetic counselor.

Authors:  Katrina E Kotzer; Jacquelyn D Riley; Jessie H Conta; Claire M Anderson; Kimberly A Schahl; McKinsey L Goodenberger
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Academic family physicians' perception of genetic testing and integration into practice: a CERA study.

Authors:  Arch G Mainous; Sharleen P Johnson; Svetlana Chirina; Richard Baker
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Genetic counselor review of genetic test orders in a reference laboratory reduces unnecessary testing.

Authors:  Christine E Miller; Patti Krautscheid; Erin E Baldwin; Tatiana Tvrdik; Amanda S Openshaw; Kim Hart; Danielle Lagrave
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Use of genetic tests among neurologists and psychiatrists: knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and needs for training.

Authors:  Melissa Salm; Kristopher Abbate; Paul Appelbaum; Ruth Ottman; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Roy Alcalay; Jill Goldman; Alexander Malik Curtis; Christopher Leech; Katherine Johansen Taber; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Implementation of a Clinical Decision Support Tool for Stool Cultures and Parasitological Studies in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  D Nikolic; S S Richter; K Asamoto; R Wyllie; R Tuttle; G W Procop
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Applications of molecular testing in surgical pathology of the head and neck.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hunt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Reduction of Health Care Costs and Improved Appropriateness of Incoming Test Orders: the Impact of Genetic Counselor Review in an Academic Genetic Testing Laboratory.

Authors:  Emily Wakefield; Haley Keller; Hannah Mianzo; Chinmayee B Nagaraj; Sanjukta Tawde; Elizabeth Ulm
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Response to Commercial Genetic Testing and the Future of the Genetic Counseling Profession.

Authors:  McKinsey L Goodenberger; Brittany C Thomas; Teresa Kruisselbrink
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Movement of Genetic Counselors from Clinical to Non-clinical Positions: Identifying Driving Forces.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Megan E Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  All Along the Watchtower: a Case of Long QT Syndrome Misdiagnosis Secondary to Genetic Testing Misinterpretation.

Authors:  Benjamin M Helm; Mark D Ayers; Adam C Kean
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-08-16       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Promoting appropriate genetic testing: the impact of a combined test review and consultative service.

Authors:  Carlos J Suarez; Linbo Yu; Natalie Downs; Helio A Costa; David A Stevenson
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Pitfalls and challenges in genetic test interpretation: An exploration of genetic professionals experience with interpretation of results.

Authors:  Katherine E Donohue; Catherine Gooch; Alexander Katz; Jessica Wakelee; Anne Slavotinek; Bruce R Korf
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.296

9.  The Genomic Consultation Service: A clinical service designed to improve patient selection for genome-wide sequencing in British Columbia.

Authors:  Alison M Elliott; Christèle du Souich; Shelin Adam; Nick Dragojlovic; Clara van Karnebeek; Tanya N Nelson; Anna Lehman; Larry D Lynd; Jan M Friedman
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.183

Review 10.  Effectiveness of Practices to Support Appropriate Laboratory Test Utilization: A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Matthew Rubinstein; Robert Hirsch; Kakali Bandyopadhyay; Bereneice Madison; Thomas Taylor; Anne Ranne; Millie Linville; Keri Donaldson; Felicitas Lacbawan; Nancy Cornish
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.