Literature DB >> 24665052

Genetic counselor review of genetic test orders in a reference laboratory reduces unnecessary testing.

Christine E Miller1, Patti Krautscheid, Erin E Baldwin, Tatiana Tvrdik, Amanda S Openshaw, Kim Hart, Danielle Lagrave.   

Abstract

Genetic tests are routinely ordered by health care providers (HCPs) within a wide range of medical specialties. Many providers have limited knowledge or experience with ordering and interpreting genetic tests; thus, test order errors are common. Rigorous review of genetic test orders by genetic counselors (GCs) can provide a direct financial benefit to medical institutions, patients and insurers. GCs at ARUP (Associated Regional University Pathologists) Laboratories routinely perform a preanalytic assessment of complex molecular genetic test orders that includes reviewing clinical and family history information and considering the clinical utility and cost-effectiveness of ordered tests. GCs contact the ordering institution and/or HCP as needed to collect additional clinical information and confirm the test order or suggest alternative testing based on the provided information. A retrospective review of the GC-facilitated test changes over a 21-month period at ARUP laboratories was performed. Approximately 26% of all requests for complex genetic tests assessing germ line mutations were changed following GC review. Testing fees associated with canceled tests were summed to estimate the cost-savings resulting from GC-facilitated test reviews. The test review process resulted in an average reduction in charges to the referring institutions of $48,000.00 per month. GC review of genetic test orders for appropriateness and clinical utility reduces healthcare costs to hospitals, insurers, and patients.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  genetic counselors; health care costs; misordered tests; molecular genetic testing; test order review

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24665052     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  36 in total

1.  Elucidating Genetic Counseling Outcomes from the Perspective of Genetic Counselors.

Authors:  Heather A Zierhut; K M Shannon; D L Cragun; S A Cohen
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Genetic Counselors in Startup Companies: Redefining the Genetic Counselor Role.

Authors:  Marina M Rabideau; Kenny Wong; Erynn S Gordon; Lauren Ryan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Improving Molecular Genetic Test Utilization through Order Restriction, Test Review, and Guidance.

Authors:  Jacquelyn D Riley; Gary W Procop; Kandice Kottke-Marchant; Robert Wyllie; Felicitas L Lacbawan
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  The Undergraduate Training in Genomics (UTRIG) Initiative: early & active training for physicians in the genomic medicine era.

Authors:  Rebecca L Wilcox; Patricia V Adem; Ebrahim Afshinnekoo; James B Atkinson; Leah W Burke; Hoiwan Cheung; Shoumita Dasgupta; Julia DeLaGarza; Loren Joseph; Robin LeGallo; Madelyn Lew; Christina M Lockwood; Alice Meiss; Jennifer Norman; Priscilla Markwood; Hasan Rizvi; Kate P Shane-Carson; Mark E Sobel; Eric Suarez; Laura J Tafe; Jason Wang; Richard L Haspel
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Use of a patient-entered family health history tool with decision support in primary care: impact of identification of increased risk patients on genetic counseling attendance.

Authors:  Adam H Buchanan; Carol A Christianson; Tiffany Himmel; Karen P Powell; Astrid Agbaje; Geoffrey S Ginsburg; Vincent C Henrich; Lori A Orlando
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Reduction of Health Care Costs and Improved Appropriateness of Incoming Test Orders: the Impact of Genetic Counselor Review in an Academic Genetic Testing Laboratory.

Authors:  Emily Wakefield; Haley Keller; Hannah Mianzo; Chinmayee B Nagaraj; Sanjukta Tawde; Elizabeth Ulm
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  The Genetic Counselor's Role in Managing Ethical Dilemmas Arising in the Laboratory Setting.

Authors:  Jessica R Balcom; Katrina E Kotzer; Lindsey A Waltman; Jennifer L Kemppainen; Brittany C Thomas
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Further Defining the Role of the Laboratory Genetic Counselor.

Authors:  Lindsey Waltman; Cassandra Runke; Jessica Balcom; Jacquelyn D Riley; Margaret Lilley; Susan Christian; Lindsay Zetzsche; McKinsey L Goodenberger
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Large, Prospective Analysis of the Reasons Patients Do Not Pursue BRCA Genetic Testing Following Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Sommer Hayden; Sarah Mange; Debra Duquette; Nancie Petrucelli; Victoria M Raymond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Movement of Genetic Counselors from Clinical to Non-clinical Positions: Identifying Driving Forces.

Authors:  Stephanie A Cohen; Megan E Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.