RATIONALE: Effective teamwork is fundamental to the management of medical emergencies, and yet the best method to teach teamwork skills to trainees remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: In a cohort of incoming internal medicine interns, we tested the hypothesis that expert demonstration of teamwork principles and participation in high-fidelity simulation would each result in objectively assessed teamwork behavior superior to traditional didactics. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial comparing three teamwork teaching modalities for incoming internal medicine interns. Participants in a single-day orientation at the Vanderbilt University Center for Experiential Learning and Assessment were randomized 1:1:1 to didactic, demonstration-based, or simulation-based instruction and then evaluated in their management of a simulated crisis by five independent, blinded observers using the Teamwork Behavioral Rater score. Clinical performance was assessed using the American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support algorithm and a novel "Recognize, Respond, Reassess" score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants randomized to didactics (n = 18), demonstration (n = 17), and simulation (n = 17) were similar at baseline. The primary outcome of average overall Teamwork Behavioral Rater score for those who received demonstration-based training was similar to simulation participation (4.40 ± 1.15 vs. 4.10 ± 0.95, P = 0.917) and significantly higher than didactic instruction (4.40 ± 1.15 vs. 3.10 ± 0.51, P = 0.045). Clinical performance scores were similar between the three groups and correlated only weakly with teamwork behavior (coefficient of determination [Rs(2)] = 0.267, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among incoming internal medicine interns, teamwork training by expert demonstration resulted in similar teamwork behavior to participation in high-fidelity simulation and was more effective than traditional didactics. Clinical performance was largely independent of teamwork behavior and did not differ between training modalities.
RCT Entities:
RATIONALE: Effective teamwork is fundamental to the management of medical emergencies, and yet the best method to teach teamwork skills to trainees remains unknown. OBJECTIVES: In a cohort of incoming internal medicine interns, we tested the hypothesis that expert demonstration of teamwork principles and participation in high-fidelity simulation would each result in objectively assessed teamwork behavior superior to traditional didactics. METHODS: This was a randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial comparing three teamwork teaching modalities for incoming internal medicine interns. Participants in a single-day orientation at the Vanderbilt University Center for Experiential Learning and Assessment were randomized 1:1:1 to didactic, demonstration-based, or simulation-based instruction and then evaluated in their management of a simulated crisis by five independent, blinded observers using the Teamwork Behavioral Rater score. Clinical performance was assessed using the American Heart Association Advanced Cardiac Life Support algorithm and a novel "Recognize, Respond, Reassess" score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:Participants randomized to didactics (n = 18), demonstration (n = 17), and simulation (n = 17) were similar at baseline. The primary outcome of average overall Teamwork Behavioral Rater score for those who received demonstration-based training was similar to simulation participation (4.40 ± 1.15 vs. 4.10 ± 0.95, P = 0.917) and significantly higher than didactic instruction (4.40 ± 1.15 vs. 3.10 ± 0.51, P = 0.045). Clinical performance scores were similar between the three groups and correlated only weakly with teamwork behavior (coefficient of determination [Rs(2)] = 0.267, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among incoming internal medicine interns, teamwork training by expert demonstration resulted in similar teamwork behavior to participation in high-fidelity simulation and was more effective than traditional didactics. Clinical performance was largely independent of teamwork behavior and did not differ between training modalities.
Entities:
Keywords:
education; medical care team; patient simulation; team training
Authors: Jennifer Weller; Robert Frengley; Jane Torrie; Boaz Shulruf; Brian Jolly; Lara Hopley; Kaylene Hendersdon; Peter Dzendrowskyj; Bevan Yee; Adam Paul Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Julia Neily; Peter D Mills; Yinong Young-Xu; Brian T Carney; Priscilla West; David H Berger; Lisa M Mazzia; Douglas E Paull; James P Bagian Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-10-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Robyn Clay-Williams; Catherine A McIntosh; Ross Kerridge; Jeffrey Braithwaite Journal: Int J Qual Health Care Date: 2013-04-02 Impact factor: 2.038
Authors: Yasuharu Okuda; Ethan O Bryson; Samuel DeMaria; Lisa Jacobson; Joshua Quinones; Bing Shen; Adam I Levine Journal: Mt Sinai J Med Date: 2009-08
Authors: Jennita G Meinema; Nienke Buwalda; Faridi S van Etten-Jamaludin; Mechteld R M Visser; Nynke van Dijk Journal: Acad Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Benedict Gross; Leonie Rusin; Jan Kiesewetter; Jan M Zottmann; Martin R Fischer; Stephan Prückner; Alexandra Zech Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mindy K Ross; Ami Doshi; London Carrasca; Patricia Pian; JoAnne Auger; Amira Baker; James A Proudfoot; Mark S Pian Journal: Int J Pediatr Date: 2017-02-12